Emotion comprehension (EC), theory of mind (ToM), and language are particularly important aspects of child development. In recent years, there has been increasing interest in understanding how these three variables are related to preschool children. However, results have been contradictory, and it is not clear how EC, ToM, and language are associated. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationships among EC, ToM, and language through a longitudinal study. Participants were 105 children (49 girls and 56 boys). EC, ToM, and language skills were assessed when children were 3, 4, and 5 years old. The cross-lagged model confirmed that EC preceded ToM in time. The half-longitudinal model showed that linguistic skills at 4 years old mediated the relationship between EC at 3 years old and ToM at 5 years old. These findings provide important insights into the complex relationships among EC, ToM, and language. Developmental, educational, and clinical implications of the results are discussed.
AllanN. P.LoniganC. J. (2011). Examining the dimensionality of effortful control in preschool children and its relation to academic and socio-emotional indicators. Developmental Psychology, 47, 905–915.
3.
AstingtonJ. W.BairdJ. A. (Eds.). (2005). Why language matters for theory of mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
AznarA.TenenbaumH. (2013). Spanish parents’ emotion talk and their children’s understanding of emotion. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00670
5.
BenderP. K.PonsF.HarrisP. L.de RosnayM. (2011). Do young children misunderstand their own emotions?European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 331–348. doi:10.1080/17405629.2010.495615
6.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
7.
BloomL. (1998). Language development and emotional expression. Pediatrics, 102, 1272–1277.
8.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 230–258. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005
9.
ColeD. A.MaxwellS. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558–577. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.558
10.
CuttingA. L.DunnJ. (1999). Theory of mind, emotion understanding, language, and family background: Individual differences and interrelations. Child Development, 70, 853–865. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00061
11.
DavidsonR.BegleyS. (2012). The emotional life of your brain. New York, NY: Hudson Street Press.
12.
DenhamS. (1998). Emotional development in young children. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
13.
de RosnayM.PonsF.HarrisP. L.MorrellJ. (2004). A lag between understanding false belief and emotion attribution in young children: Relationships with linguistic ability and mothers’ mental-state language. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 197–218. doi:10.1348/026151004323044573
14.
De StasioS.FiorilliC.Di ChiacchioC. (2014). Effects of verbal ability and fluid intelligence on children’s emotion understanding. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 409–414. doi:10.1002/ijop.12032
15.
DunnJ. (1995). Children as psychologists - the later correlates of individual differences in understanding of emotions and other minds. Cognition & Emotion, 9, 187–201. doi:10.1080/02699939508409008
16.
DunnJ. (2000). Mind-reading, emotion understanding, and relationships. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24, 142–144. doi:10.1080/016502500383241
17.
DunnJ.BrownJ.SlomkowskiC.TeslaC.YoungbladeL. (1991). Young children’s understanding of other people’s feelings and beliefs: Individual differences and their antecedents. Child Development, 62, 1352. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.ep9202105165
18.
EdginJ. O.ClarkC. A.MassandE.Karmiloff-SmithA. (2015). Building an adaptive brain across development: Targets for neurorehabilitation must begin in infancy. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 1–15. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00232
19.
Fernández-SánchezM.QuintanillaL.Giménez-DasíM. (2015). Pensando las emociones con niños de dos años: Un programa educativo para mejorar el conocimiento emocional en primer ciclo de educación infantil [Thinking emotions with 2 year old children: An educational program to improve emotion knowledge in young children]. Cultura y Educacion, 27, 802–838. doi:10.1080/11356405.2015.1089385
20.
FidalgoA. M.TenenbaumH. R.AznarA. (2018). Are there gender differences in emotion comprehension? Analysis of the test of emotion comprehension. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27, 1065–1074. doi:10.1007/s10826-017-0956-5
21.
FieldT.DiegoM. (2008). Vagal activity, early growth and emotional development. Infant Behavior and Development, 31, 361–373. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2007.12.008
22.
HarrisP. L.de RosnayM.RonfardS. (2014). The mysterious emotional life of little red riding hood. Contributions to Human Development, 26, 106–118. doi:10.1159/000354364
23.
HarwoodM. D.FarrarM. J. (2006). Conflicting emotions: The connection between affective perspective taking and theory of mind. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 401–418. doi:10.1348/026151005X50302
24.
HobsonR. P. (1993). The emotional origins of social understanding. Philosophical Psychology, 6, 227–249. doi:10.1080/09515089308573090
25.
HughesC.DunnJ. (1998). Understanding mind and emotion: Longitudinal associations with mental-state talk between young friends. Developmental Psychology, 34, 1026–1037. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.34.5.1026
26.
Jiménez ElorriagaM.Alonso MartínezM. I.García ValeroG.Marco MorenoB.Giménez-DasíM. (2013). Mejorar las competencias socioemocionales en niños gitanos: Una intervención a través de la Filosofía para Niños [How to improve socio-emotional competeces in Roma children: An intervention through Philosophy for Children]. IX Jornadas de Educación Emocional [IX Meeting on Emotional Education]. Barcelona, 13–16 March2013.
27.
JohnsonM. H.JonesE. J. H.GligaT. (2015). Brain adaptation and alternative developmental trajectories. Development and Psychopathology, 27, 425–442. doi:10.1017/S0954579415000073
28.
Karmiloff-SmithA. (1992). Beyond modularity. A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
Karmiloff-SmithA. (2015). An alternative to domain-general or domain-specific frameworks for theorizing about human evolution and ontogenesis. AIMS Neuroscience, 2, 91–104.
30.
KennyD. A.KaniskanB.McCoachD. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44, 486–507.
31.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
32.
LaBountyJ.WellmanH. M.OlsonS.LagattutaK.LiuD. (2008). Mothers’ and fathers’ use of internal state talk with their young children. Social Development, 17, 757–775. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00450.x
33.
LittleT. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
34.
LiuY.MoS.SongY.WangM. (2016). Longitudinal analysis in occupational health psychology: A review and tutorial of three longitudinal modeling techniques. Applied Psychology, 65, 379–411. doi:10.1111/apps.12055
35.
LoniganC.SpiegelJ.GoodrichJ.MorrisB.OsborneC.LernerM.PhillipsB. (2017). Does preschool self-regulation predict later behavior problems in general or specific problem behaviors?Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 45, 1491–1502. doi:10.1007/s10802-016-0260-7
36.
MaxwellS. E.ColeD. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12, 23–44. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.23
37.
MesmanJ.van IJzendoornM. H.Bakermans-KranenburgM. J. (2009). The many faces of the still-face paradigm: A review and meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 29, 120–162. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2009.02.001
38.
MilliganK.AstingtonJ. W.DackL. A. (2007). Language and theory of mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development, 78, 622–646. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01018.x
39.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2012). MPlus user’s guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
40.
NilssonK. K.de LópezK. J. (2016). Theory of mind in children with specific language impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Development, 87, 143–153. doi:10.1111/cdev.12462
41.
O’BrienM.WeaverJ.NelsonJ.CalkinsS.LeerkesE.MarcovitchS. (2011). Longitudinal associations between children’s understanding of emotions and theory of mind. Cognition & Emotion, 25, 1074–1086. doi:10.1080/02699931.2010.518417
42.
OrnaghiV.PepeA.GrazzaniI. G. (2016). False-belief understanding and language ability mediate the relationship between emotion comprehension and prosocial orientation in preschoolers. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1534. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01534.
43.
PonsF.HarrisP. L. (2000). Test of emotion comprehension. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford.
44.
PonsF.HarrisP. L. (2005) Longitudinal change and longitudinal stability of individual differences in children’s emotion understanding. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 1158–1174. doi:10.1080/02699930500282108
45.
PonsF.HarrisP. L.de RosnayM. (2004). Emotion comprehension between 3 and 11 years: Developmental periods and hierarchical organization. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1, 127–152. doi:10.1080/17405620344000022
46.
PonsF.LawsonJ.HarrisP. L.de RosnayM. (2003). Individual differences in children’s emotion understanding: Effects of age and language. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 44, 347–353. doi:10.1111/1467-9450.00354
47.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
48.
PremackD. G.WoodruffG. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 515–526. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00076512
49.
Rivière, A., & Núñez, M. (2001). La mirada mental: Desarrollo de las capacidades cognitivas interpersonales ( 3nd ed.). Buenos Aires: Aique.
50.
RuffmanT.SladeL.RowlandsonK.RumseyC.GarnhamA. (2003). How language relates to belief, desire, and emotion understanding. Cognitive Development, 18, 139–158. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(03)00002-9
51.
SaarniC. (1999). The development of emotional competence. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
52.
Sarmento-HenriqueR.RecioP.Lucas-MolinaB.QuintanillaL.Giménez-DasíM. (2019). The Role of Language in the Relationship between Emotion Comprehension and Theory of Mind in Preschool Children. International Journal of Emotional Education, 11(1), 169–176.
53.
SchoreA. (2003a). Affect dysregulation & disorders of the self. Portland, OR: Ringgold Inc.
54.
SchoreA. (2003b). Affect regulation and repair of the self. Portland, OR: Ringgold Inc.
55.
SchoreA. (2010). The right brain implicit self: A central mechanism of the psychotherapy change process. In PetrucelliJ. (Ed.), Knowing, not-knowing and sort of knowing: Psychoanalysis and the experience of uncertainty (pp. 177–202). London, UK: Karnac.
56.
SeidenfeldA.JohnsonS.CavadelE.IzardC. (2014). Theory of mind predicts emotion knowledge development in head start children. Early Education and Develpment, 25, 933–948. doi:10.1080/10409289.2014.883587
57.
SiegelD. J. (2012). The developing mind. How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are (2nd ed.). New York, NY: New York Guilford Press.
58.
SorceJ. F.EmdeR. N.CamposJ. J.KlinnertM. D. (1985). Maternal emotional signaling: Its effect on the visual cliff behavior of 1-year-olds. Developmental Psychology, 21, 195.
59.
TaumoepeauM.RuffmanT. (2006). Mother and infant talk about mental states relates to desire, language and emotion understanding. Child Development, 77, 465–481.
60.
TaumoepeauM.RuffmanT. (2008). Stepping stones to others’ minds: Maternal talk relates to child mental state language and emotion understanding at 15, 24, and 33 months. Child Development, 79, 284–302.
61.
TrevarthenC. (1986). Los motivos para entenderse y cooperar. In PerinatA. (Ed.), La comunicación preverbal [The primary motives for cognitive understanding] (A. Perinat Trans.) (pp. 182–207). Barcelona, Spain: Avesta.
62.
TronickE.AlsH.AdamsonL.WiseS.BrazeltonT. B. (1978). The infant’s response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 17, 1.
63.
VallotonC.AyoubC. (2011). Use your words: The role of language in the development of toddlers’ self-regulation. Early Child Research Quarterly, 26, 169–181.
64.
VygotskiL. (1934/1986). Pensamiento y lenguaje[Thought and language]. Barcelona, Spain: Paidós.
65.
WeimerA. A.SallquistJ.BolnickR. R. (2012). Young children’s emotion comprehension and theory of mind understanding. Early Education and Development, 23, 280–301. doi:10.1080/10409289.2010.517694
66.
WellmanH.BanerjeeM. (1991). Mind and emotion: Children’s understanding of the emotional consequences of beliefs and desires. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 191–214. doi:10.1111/j.2044-835X.1991.tb00871.x
67.
WellmanH.LiuD. (2004). Scaling of theory of mind tasks. Child Development, 75, 523–541.
68.
WellmanH.WoolleyJ. D. (1990). From simple desires to ordinary beliefs: The early development of everyday psychology. Cognition, 35, 245–275. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(90)90024-E
69.
WidenS. C. (2013). Children’s interpretation of facial expressions: The long path from valence-based to specific discrete categories. Emotion Review, 5, 72–77.
70.
WidenS. C.RussellJ. A. (2010). Differentiation in preschooler’s categories for emotion. Emotion, 10, 651–661.
71.
ZadehZ.Im-BolterN.CohenN. J. (2007). Social cognition and externalizing prychopathology: An investigation of the mediating role of language. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 141–152.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
