Frontal electroencephalogram (EEG) asymmetry reactivity: Exploring changes from baseline to still face procedure response

Abstract

Electroencephalogram (EEG) asymmetry has been widely studied across the lifespan, with multiple studies conducted in infancy. However, few have investigated frontal EEG asymmetry in the context of emotional-eliciting tasks, controlling for baseline to focus on an experimental episode response. The present study was designed to address this gap in research, predicting frontal EEG asymmetry response in the context of the Still Face procedure (SFP), examining mother–infant interaction quality and infant temperament attributes as potential contributors. Moderation by infant temperament was also considered. Results indicated that intensity and tone of parent–child interactions as well as Surgency/Positive Affectivity (and component scales of Approach and Activity Level) predicted frontal EEG asymmetry during SFP, controlling for baseline. Importantly, moderation was noted for Surgency/Positive Affectivity and its Approach component, reflected in significant interaction terms and follow-up simple slope tests. That is, the effect of intensity in mother–infant interactions was qualified by child overall surgency, and approach more specifically – infants demonstrating higher levels of Surgency/Positive Affectivity and Approach in particular were protected from the right frontal EEG response to SFP noted in the context of intense concurrent exchanges with mothers.

Keywords

Electroencephalogram (EEG) asymmetry still face procedure temperament parent–child interactions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aiken

L. S.

West

S. G.

(2013). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Allen

J. J.

Coan

J. A.

Nazarian

(2004). Issues and assumptions on the road from raw signals to metrics of frontal EEG asymmetry in emotion. Biological Psychology, 67, 183–218.

Barry

R. J.

Clarke

A. R.

Johnstone

S. J.

Magee

C. A.

Rushby

J. A.

(2007). EEG differences between eyes-closed and eyes-open resting conditions. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2765–2773. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2007.07.028.

Bell

M. A.

(2001). Brain electrical activity associated with cognitive processing during a looking version of the A-Not-B task. Infancy, 2, 311–330. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327078IN0203_2.

Bell

M. A.

Fox

N. A.

(1992). The relations between frontal brain electrical activity and cognitive development during Infancy. Child Development, 63, 1142–1163.

Bell

M. A.

Fox

N. A.

(1994). Brain development over the first year of life: Relations between electroencephalographic frequency and coherence and cognitive and affective behaviors. In Dawson

Fischer

K. W.

(Eds.), Human behavior and the developing brain (pp. 314–345). New York, NY: Guilford.

Benasich

A. A.

Gou

Choudhury

Harris

K. D.

(2008). Early cognitive and language skills are linked to resting frontal gamma power across the first 3 years. Behavioural Brain Research, 195, 215–222. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2008.08.049.

Braungart-Rieker

J. M.

Hill-Soderlund

A. L.

Karrass

(2010). Fear and anger reactivity trajectories from 4 to 16 months: The roles of temperament, regulation, and maternal sensitivity. Developmental Psychology, 46, 791–804. doi:10.1037/a0019673.

Buss

K. A.

Schumacher

J. R. M.

Dolski

Kalin

N. H.

Goldsmith

H. H.

Davidson

R. J.

(2003). Right frontal brain activity, cortisol, and withdrawal behavior in 6-month-old infants. Behavioral Neuroscience, 117, 11–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.117.1.11.

10.

Calkins

S. D.

(1994). The development of emotion regulation: Biological and behavioral considerations. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59, 53–72.

11.

Calkins

S. D.

Dedmon

S. E.

Gill

K. L.

Lomax

L. E.

Johnson

L. M.

(2002). Frustration in infancy: Implications for emotion regulation, physiological processes, and temperament. Infancy, 3, 175–197.

12.

Coan

J. A.

Allen

J. J.

(2004). Frontal EEG asymmetry as a moderator and mediator of emotion. Biological Psychology, 67, 7–50. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.002.

13.

Coan

J. A.

Allen

J. J. B.

McKnight

P. E.

(2006). A capability model of individual differences in frontal EEG asymmetry. Biological Psychology, 72, 198–207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.10.003.

14.

Conradt

Ablow

(2010). Infant physiological response to the still-face paradigm: Contributions of maternal sensitivity and infants’ early regulatory behavior. Infant Behavior and Development, 33, 251–265. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2010.01.001.

15.

Curtis

W. J.

Cicchetti

(2007). Emotion and resilience: A multilevel investigation of hemispheric electroencephalogram asymmetry and emotion regulation in maltreated and nonmaltreated children. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 811–840. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579407000405.

16.

Davidson

R. J.

(2001). The neural circuitry of emotion and affective style: Prefrontal cortex and amygdala contributions. Social Science Information, 40, 11–37.

17.

Davidson

R. J.

Fox

N. A.

(1989). Frontal brain asymmetry predicts infants’ response to maternal separation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 127–131.

18.

Degnan

K. A.

Hane

A. A.

Henderson

H. A.

Moas

O. L.

Reeb-Sutherland

B. C.

Fox

N. A.

(2011). Longitudinal stability of temperamental exuberance and social–emotional outcomes in early childhood. Developmental Psychology, 47, 765–780. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021316.

19.

Diaz

Bell

M. A.

(2012). Frontal EEG asymmetry and fear reactivity in different contexts at 10 months. Developmental Psychobiology, 54, 536–545. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20612.

20.

DiCorcia

J. A.

Snidman

Sravish

A. V.

Tronick

(2016). Evaluating the nature of the Still-Face effect in the double face-to-face still-face paradigm using different comparison groups. Infancy, 21, 332–352.

21.

Diego

M. A.

Field

Jones

N. A.

Hernandez-Reif

(2006). Withdrawn and intrusive maternal interaction style and infant frontal EEG asymmetry shifts in infants of depressed and non-depressed mothers. Infant Behavior and Development, 29, 220–229.

22.

Diego

Jones

N. A.

Field

(2010). EEG in 1-week, 1-month and 3-month-old infants of depressed and non-depressed mothers. Biological Psychology, 83, 7–14.

23.

Dougherty

L. R.

Klein

D. N.

Durbin

C. E.

Hayden

E. P.

Olino

T. M.

(2010). Temperamental positive and negative emotionality and children’s depressive symptoms: A longitudinal prospective study from age three to age ten. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29, 462–488.

24.

Enlow

M. B.

Kitts

R. L.

Blood

Bizarro

Hofmeister

Wright

R. J.

(2011). Maternal posttraumatic stress symptoms and infant emotional reactivity and emotion regulation. Infant Behavior and Development, 34, 487–503.

25.

Fox

N. A.

Calkins

S. D.

Bell

M. A.

(1994). Development and neuroplasticity: Behavioral and cognitive outcomes. Development and Psychopathology, 6, 677–696.

26.

Fox

N. A.

Henderson

H. A.

Rubin

K. H.

Calkins

S. D.

Schmidt

L. A.

(2001). Continuity and discontinuity of behavioral inhibition and exuberance: Psychophysiological and behavioral influences across the first four years of life. Child Development, 72, 1–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00262.

27.

Gagne

J. R.

Van Hulle

C. A.

Aksan

Essex

M. J.

Goldsmith

H. H.

(2011). Deriving childhood temperament measures from emotion-eliciting behavioral episodes: Scale construction and initial validation. Psychological Assessment, 23, 337–353. doi:10.1037/a0021746.

28.

Gartstein

M. A.

Bell

M. A.

Calkins

S. D.

(2014). EEG asymmetry at 10 months of age: Are temperament trait predictors different for boys and girls? Developmental Psychobiology, 56, 1327–1340.

29.

Gartstein

M. A.

Crawford

Robertson

C. D.

(2008). Early development of language and attention: Mutual contributions and the impact of parent-infant interaction attributes. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 39, 9–26.

30.

Gartstein

M. A.

Hancock

G. R.

Iverson

S. L.

(2018). Positive affectivity and fear trajectories in infancy: Contributions of mother-child interaction factors. Child Development, 89, 1519–1534.

31.

Gartstein

M. A.

Marmion

(2008). Fear and positive affectivity in infancy: Convergence/discrepancy between parent-report and laboratory-based indicators. Infant Behavior and Development, 31, 227–238.

32.

Gartstein

M. A.

Marmion

Swanson

(2006). Infant temperament: An evaluation of children with Down syndrome. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 24, 31–41.

33.

Gartstein

M. A.

Putnam

S. P.

Kliewer

(2016). Do infant temperament characteristics predict core academic abilities in preschool-aged children? Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 299–306.

34.

Gartstein

M. A.

Rothbart

M. K.

(2003). Studying infant temperament via the revised infant behavior questionnaire. Infant Behavior and Development, 26, 64–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(02)00169-8.

35.

Gartstein

M. A.

Slobodskaya

H. R.

Putnam

S. P.

Kinsht

I. A.

(2009). A cross-cultural study of infant temperament: Predicting preschool effortful control in the United States of America (U.S.) and Russia. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 337–364.

36.

Goldsmith

H. H.

Rothbart

M. K.

(1996). Laboratory Temperament Assessment Battery (Lab-TAB): Prelocomotor Version 3.0. Available from H. H. Goldsmith, Personality Development Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.

37.

Gotlib

I. H.

Ranganath

Rosenfeld

J. P.

(1998). Frontal EEG alpha asymmetry, depression, and cognitive functioning. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 449–478.

38.

Haley

D. W.

Stansbury

(2003). Infant Stress and parent responsiveness: Regulation of physiology and behavior during Still-Face and reunion. Child Development, 74, 1534–1546.

39.

Hane

A. A.

Fox

N. A.

(2006). Ordinary variations in maternal caregiving influence human infants’ stress reactivity. Psychological Science, 17, 550–556. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01742.x.

40.

Hane

A. A.

Fox

N. A.

Henderson

H. A.

Marshall

P. J.

(2008). Behavioral reactivity and approach-withdrawal bias in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1491–1496. doi:10.1037/a0012855.

41.

Handal

A. J.

Saavedra

L. G.

Schrader

Aragon

C. R.

Paez

Lowe

J. R.

(2017). Assessment of maternal-infant interaction: Application of the Still Face paradigm in a rural population of working women in Ecuador. Maternal Child Health Journal, 21, 458–466.

42.

Harmon-Jones

Abramson

L. Y.

Sigelman

Bohlig

Hogan

M. E.

Harmon-Jones

(2002). Proneness to hypomania/mania symptoms or depression symptoms and asymmetrical frontal cortical responses to an anger-evoking event. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 610–618.

43.

Harmon-Jones

Allen

J. J. B.

(1998). Anger and frontal brain activity: EEG asymmetry consistent with approach motivation despite negative affective valence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1310–1316.

44.

Harmon-Jones

Gable

P. A.

(2018). On the role of asymmetric frontal cortical activity in approach and withdrawal motivation: An updated review of the evidence. Psychophysiology, 55, e12879. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12879.

45.

Jones

N. A.

Field

Almeida

(2009). Right frontal EEG asymmetry and behavioral inhibition in infants of depressed mothers. Infant Behavior and Development, 32, 298–304.

46.

Klimesch

Sauseng

Hanslmayr

(2007). EEG alpha oscillations: The inhibition–timing hypothesis. Brain Research Reviews, 53, 63–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.06.003.

47.

LoBue

Coan

J. A.

Thrasher

DeLoache

J. S.

(2011). Prefrontal asymmetry and parent-rated temperament in infants. PLoS ONE, 6, e22694. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022694.

48.

Lowe

Qeadan

Leeman

Shrestha

Stephen

J. M.

Bakhireva

L. N.

(2017). The effect of prenatal substance use and maternal contingent responsiveness on infant affect. Early Human Development, 115, 51–59. doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.09.013.

49.

LowKapalu

Gartstein

M. A.

(2016). Boys with Fragile X Syndrome: Investigating temperament in early childhood. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 60, 891–900.

50.

Lusby

C. M.

Goodman

S. H.

Bell

M. A.

Newport

D. J.

(2014). Electroencephalogram patterns in infants of depressed mothers. Developmental Psychobiology, 56, 459–473.

51.

Marshall

P. J.

Bar-Haim

Fox

N. A.

(2002). Development of the EEG from 5 months to 4 years of age. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 1199–1208. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00163-3.

52.

Moore

G. A.

Calkins

S. D.

(2004). Infants’ vagal regulation in the still-face paradigm is related to dyadic coordination of mother–infant interaction. Developmental Psychology, 40, 1068–1080. doi: http://ntserver1.wsulibs.wsu.edu:2111/10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1068.

53.

Moore

Hill-Soderlund

Propper

Calkins

Mills-Koonce

Cox

(2009). Mother–infant vagal regulation in the face-to-face Still-Face paradigm is moderated by maternal sensitivity. Child Development, 80, 209–223.

54.

Morasch

K. C.

Bell

M. A.

(2011). The role of inhibitory control in behavioral and physiological expressions of toddler executive function. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 593–606. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.07.003.

55.

Papousek

Freudenthaler

Schulter

(2011). Typical performance measures of emotion regulation and emotion perception and frontal EEG asymmetry in an emotional contagion paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 1018–1022.

56.

Potapova

Desmerias

Campagna

Youatt

Underwood

Sanders

(2018). Infant temperament predictors of EEG frontal activation post-still face task: Electrophysiology behind regulation. Presentation at the biennial convention of International Congress on Infant Studies, Philadelphia, PA, July.

57.

Preacher

K. J.

Curran

P. J.

Bauer

D. J.

(2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448.

58.

Preszler

J. R.

Gartstein

M. A.

(2018). Latent State-Trait Modeling: A new tool to refine temperament methodology. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42, 445–452.

59.

Putnam

S. P.

Rothbart

M. K.

Gartstein

M. A.

(2008). Homotypic and heterotypic continuity of fine-grained temperament during infancy, toddlerhood, and early childhood. Infant and Child Development, 17, 387–405.

60.

Reznick

S. J.

Allen

J. J. B.

(2018). Frontal asymmetry as a mediator and moderator of emotion: An updated review. Psychophysiology, 55, e12965. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12965.

61.

Rothbart

M. K.

(2012). Becoming who we are: Temperament and personality in development. New York, NY: Guilford.

62.

Rothbart

M. K.

Ahadi

S. A.

Evans

D. E.

(2000). Temperament and personality: Origins and outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 122–135.

63.

Rothbart

M. K.

Bates

J. E.

(2006). Temperament. In Damon

Lerner

Eisenberg

(Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 99–166). New York, NY: Wiley.

64.

Schmidt

L. A.

(2008). Patterns of second-by-second resting frontal brain (EEG) asymmetry and their relation to heart rate and temperament in 9-month-old human infants. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 216–225. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.08.001.

65.

Seifer

Dickstein

Parade

Hayden

L. C.

Magee

K. D.

Schiller

(2014). Mothers’ appraisal of goodness of fit and children’s social development. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38, 86–97. doi:10.1177/0165025413507172.

66.

Swingler

M. M.

Perry

N. B.

Calkins

S. D.

Bell

M. A.

(2014). Maternal sensitivity and infant response to frustration: The moderating role of EEG asymmetry. Infant Behavior and Development, 37, 523–535.

67.

Thibodeau

Jorgensen

R. S.

Sangmoon

(2006). Depression, anxiety, and resting frontal EEG asymmetry: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 715–729.

68.

Thomas

Chess

(1986). The New York longitudinal study: From infancy to early adult life. In Plomin

Dunn

(Eds.), The study of temperament: Changes, continuities, and challenges (pp. 39–52). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

69.

Tronick

E. Z.

(2005). Why is connection with others so critical? The formation of dyadic states of consciousness and the expansion of individuals’ states of consciousness: Coherence governed selection and the co-creation of meaning out of messy meaning making. In Nadel

Muir

(Eds.), Emotional development: Recent research advances (pp. 293–315). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

70.

Tronick

Als

Adamson

Wise

Brazelton

T. B.

(1978). Infants response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 17, 1–13.

71.

Tronick

Als

Brazelton

T. B.

(1980). Monadic phases: A structural descriptive analysis of infant– mother face to face interaction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 26, 3–24.