The present study assesses the factor structure, psychometric adequacy, and invariance across sex and age of the Relational Provisions Loneliness Questionnaire (RPLQ). Discriminant validity with an external criterion was also tested. In a sample of Portuguese adolescents, from 7th to 9th grade (N = 817), Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) were conducted to test a four-factor model of loneliness (lack of integration and/or intimacy in peer group and/or family). Results evidenced empirical support for the structure of the RPLQ loneliness scale, which fitted very well the proposed model, and provided adequate fit to the Portuguese data. There was substantial support for the construct validity (factorial, convergent, and discriminant) and reliability of the RPLQ. Measurement invariance (configural, metric, and scalar) was established across sex and age. Finally, it was assured discriminant validity, provided by the contrast with the social functioning dimensions in peer group. Overall, our findings support the conceptualization of loneliness in adolescence by peer- and family-related loneliness through lack of integration and intimacy. In a single instrument, the RPLQ loneliness scale combines measures of four important aspects of adolescents’ social life. This seems to be an adequate instrument to be used in the study of adolescents’ loneliness, in its different forms and across relational contexts.
ArbuckleJ. (2005). Amos 6.0 user’s guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc.
2.
BagnerD.StorchE.RobertiJ. (2004). A factor analytic study of the loneliness and social dissatisfaction scale in a sample of African-American and Hispanic-American children. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 34, 237–250. doi:10.1023/B: CHUD.0000014999.16111.2f
3.
BandalosD. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 78–102. Retrieved fromhttp://digitalcommons.unl.edu/edpsychpapers/65.
4.
BowkerJ. C.RajaR. (2011). Social withdrawal subtypes during early adolescence in India. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39, 201–212. doi:10.1007/s10802-010-9461-7.
5.
BozdoganH. (1987). Model selection and Akaike’s information criteria (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52, 345–370.
6.
BrislinR. (1980). Translation and content analysis for oral and written material. In TriandisH.BerryJ. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 389–444). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
7.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1989). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 445–455.
8.
BurgessK. B.WojslawowiczJ. C.RubinK. H.Rose-KrasnorL.Booth-LaForceC. (2006). Social information processing and coping strategies of shy/withdrawn and aggressive children: Does friendship matter?Child Development, 77, 371–383. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00876.x
9.
ByrneB. M. (2010). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10.
ByrneB. M.WatkinsD. (2003). The issue of measurement invariance revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 155–175. doi:10.1177/0022022102250225.
11.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834.
12.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.
13.
CorreiaJ. V.SantosA. J.FreitasM.RosadoA.RubinK. H. (2014). Análise fatorial confirmatória do Extended Class Play numa amostra portuguesa de jovens adolescentes [Confirmatory factor analysis of the Extended Class Play on a sample of Portuguese young adolescents]. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 27, 462–471. doi:10.1590/1678-7153.201427306.
14.
CramerK.BarryJ. (1999). Conceptualizations and measures of loneliness: A comparison of subscales. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 491–502. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00257-8.
15.
DiTommasoE.SpinnerB. (1997). Social and emotional loneliness: A re- examination of Weiss’ typology of loneliness. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 411–421. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(93)90182-3.
16.
European Commission. (2012). The values of European. Brussels: Author.
17.
FinneyS. J.DiStefanoC. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In HancockG. R.MuellerR. O. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 269–314). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
18.
GoossensL.BeyersW. (2002). Comparing measures of childhood loneliness: Internal consistency and confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 31, 252–262. doi:10.1207/153744202753604520.
19.
GoossensL.LasgaardM.LuyckxK.VanhalstJ.MathiasS.MasyE. (2009). Loneliness and solitude in adolescence: A confirmatory factor analysis of alternative models. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 890–894. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.011.
20.
Hayden-ThomsonL. K. (1989). Children’s loneliness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
21.
HeinrichL. M.GulloneE. (2006). The clinical significance of loneliness. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 695–718. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2006.04.002.
22.
HooperD.CoughlanJ.MullenM. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60. Retrieved fromwww.ejbrm.com.
23.
HoughtonS.HattieJ.WoodL.CarrollA.MartinK.TanC. (2014). Conceptualizing loneliness in adolescents: Development and validation of a self-report instrument. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 45, 604–616. doi:10.1007/ s10578-013-0429-z.
24.
HozaB.BukowskiW. M.BeeryS. (2000). Assessing peer network and dyadic loneliness. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 29, 119–128. doi:10.1207/S15374424jccp2001_12.
25.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
26.
KlineR. (2011). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
27.
LasgaardM.ArmourC.BramsenR.GoossensL. (2016). Major life events as predictors of loneliness in adolescence. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 631–637. doi:10.1007/s10826-015-0243-2.
28.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modelling, 9, 151–173. Retrieved fromhttp://digitalcommons.unl.edu/edpsychpapers/65.
29.
LittleT. D.RhemtullaM.GibsonK.SchoemannA. M. (2014). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18, 285–300. doi:10.1037/a0033266.
30.
MaesM.KlimstraT.van de NoortgateW.GoossensL. (2015). Factor structure and measurement invariance of a multidimensional loneliness scale: Comparisons across gender and age. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 1829–1837. doi:10.1007/s10826-014-9986-4.
31.
MaesM.VanhalstJ.SpithovenA.van de NoortgateW.GoossensL. (2016). Loneliness and attitudes toward aloneness in adolescence: A person-centered approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 547–567. doi:10.1007/s10964-015-0354-5.
32.
MaesM.VanhalstJ.van de NoortgateW.GoossensL. (2017). Intimate and relational loneliness in adolescence. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26, 2059–2069. doi:10.1007/s10826-017-0722-8.
33.
McDougallP.HymelS. (1998). Moving into middle school: Individual differences in the transition experience. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 30, 108–120. doi:10.1037/h008581130, 108-120.
34.
MellorD.StokesM.FirthL.HayashiY.CumminsR. (2008). Need for belonging, relationship satisfaction, loneliness, and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 213–218. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.03.020.
35.
MenzerM. M.OhW.McDonaldK. L.RubinK. H.Dashiell-AjeE. (2010). Behavioral correlates of peer exclusion and victimization of East Asian American and European American young adolescents. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 1, 290–302. doi:10.1037/a0022085.
36.
MusettiA.CorsanoP.MajoranoM.ManciniT. (2012). Identity processes and experience of being alone during late adolescence. International Journal of Psychoanalysis and Education, 4, 44–65. Retrieved fromhttp://www.psychoedu.org/index.php/IJPE/article/view/54/41.
37.
PeplauL. A.PerlmanD. (1982). Perspectives on loneliness. In PeplauL. A.PerlmanD. (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 1–18). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
38.
QualterP.MunnP. (2002). The separateness of social and emotional loneliness in childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 233–244. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00016.
39.
RaykovT.MarcoulidesG. A. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40.
RubinK. H.BukowskiW. M.ParkerJ. G.BowkerJ. C. (2008). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In DamonW.LernerR. M. (Eds.), Child and adolescent development: An advanced course (pp. 141–180). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
41.
RubinK. H.ChenX.McDougallP.BowkerA.McKinnonJ. (1995). The Waterloo Longitudinal Project: Predicting internalizing and externalizing problems in adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 751–764. doi:10.1017/s0954579400006829.
42.
RussellD.PeplauL. A.CutronaC. E. (1980). The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472–480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472.
43.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
44.
Terrell-DeutschB. (1999). The conceptualization and measurement of childhood loneliness. In RotenbergK.HymelS. (Eds.), Loneliness in childhood and adolescence (pp. 11–33). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45.
VandenbergR. J.LanceC. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–69. doi:10.1177/109442810031002.
46.
WeissR. S. (1973). Loneliness: The experience of emotional and social isolation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47.
WheatonB.MuthénB.AlwinD. F.SummensG. F. (1977). Assessing the reliability and stability in panel models. In HeiseD. R. (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 84–136). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
48.
ZellerM.VannattaK.SchaferJ.NollR. B. (2003). Behavioral reputation: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 39, 129–139. doi:10.1037/00121649.39.1.129.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
