The present study examined whether bullying, defending, and outsider behaviors in preschool children were associated with two conscience aspects (empathic concern and internalization of rules) and with emotion understanding. We also investigated whether emotion understanding moderated the relationship between these dimensions and bullying roles. Participants were 105 children (51 males), aged 36 to 76 months. Bullying roles were assessed through peer nominations. Internalization of rules and empathic concern were observed in classroom and their scores derived from selected Q-Sort items. Emotion understanding was evaluated with the Puppet Interview administered to children. Results showed that empathic concern and internalization of rules were negatively associated with bullying and outsider behaviors, whereas emotion understanding correlated with defending behavior. The interaction between emotion understanding and internalization of rules was also significant: Low scores on rule-compatible conduct were associated with bullying or outsider behavior, in particular for those children with poor emotion understanding.
AksanN.KochanskaG. (2005). Conscience in childhood: Old questions, new answers. Developmental Psychology, 41, 506–516.
2.
AlsakerF. D.ValkanoverS. (2001). Early diagnosis and prevention of victimization in kindergarten. In JuvonenJ.GrahamS. (Eds.) Peer harassment in school (pp. 175–195). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
3.
BelacchiC.FarinaE. (2010). Prosocial/hostile roles and emotion comprehension in preschoolers. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 371–389.
4.
BlockJ. H.BlockJ. (1980). The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the organization of behavior. In CollinsW. A. (Ed.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology. Vol. 13. Development of cognition, affect, and social relations (pp. 39–101). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
CamodecaM.CaravitaS. C. S.CoppolaG. (2015). Bullying in preschool: The associations between participant roles, social competence, and social preference. Aggressive Behavior, 41, 310–321.
6.
CamodecaM.CoppolaG. (2010). Competenza socio-emotiva e difficoltà di relazione in età prescolare: Un approccio multi-informatore [Socio-emotional competence and relationships difficulties in preschool age: A multi-informant approach]. In BaumgartnerE. (Ed.), Gli esordi della competenza emotiva. Strumenti di studio e di valutazione [The beginning of emotional competence. Instruments for research and evaluation] (pp. 51–74). Milan, Italy: LED.
7.
CaravitaS. C. S.GiniG.PozzoliT. (2012). Main and moderated effects of moral cognition and status on bullying and defending. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 456–468.
8.
CoppolaG.CamodecaM. (2010). La metodologia Q-Sort. Valutare la competenza sociale nella scuola dell’infanzia [The Q-Sort methodology. Assessing social competence in preschool]. Rome, Italy: Carocci.
9.
DecetyJ.MeyerM. (2008). From emotion resonance to empathic understanding: A social developmental neuroscience account. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 1053–1080.
10.
DenhamS. A. (1998). Emotional development in young children. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
11.
DunnJ.BrownJ. R.MaguireM. (1995). The development of children’s moral sensibility: Individual differences and emotion understanding. Developmental Psychology, 31, 649–659.
12.
EisenbergN. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665–697.
13.
HoffmanM. L. (1979). Development of moral thought, feeling, and behavior. American Psychologist, 34, 958–966.
14.
KochanskaG.KoenigJ. L.BarryR. A.KimS.YoonJ. E. (2010). Children’s conscience during toddler and preschool years, moral self, and a competent, adaptive developmental trajectory. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1320–1332.
15.
LaneJ. D.WellmanH. M.OlsonS. L.LaBountyJ.KerrD. C. R. (2010). Theory of mind and emotion understanding predict moral development in early childhood. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28, 871–889.
16.
MaltiT.GummerumM.KellerM.BuchmannM. (2009). Children’s moral motivation, sympathy, and prosocial behavior. Child Development, 80, 442–460.
17.
MenesiniE.CamodecaM. (2008). Shame and guilt as behaviour regulators: Relationships with bullying, victimization and prosocial behaviour. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26, 183–196.
18.
MonksC. P.SmithP. K.SwettenhamJ. (2003). Aggressors, victims, and defenders in preschool: Peer, self-, and teacher reports. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 453–469.
19.
PonsF.HarrisP. L. (2005). Longitudinal change and longitudinal stability of individual differences in children’s emotion understanding. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 1158–1174.
20.
PonsF.LawsonJ.HarrisP. L.de RosnayM. (2003). Individual differences in children’s emotion understanding: Effects of age and language. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 44, 347–353.
21.
SalmivalliC.LagerspetzK.BjörkqvistK.ÖstermanK.KaukiainenA. (1996). Bullying as a group process. Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15.
22.
StoreyK.SlabyR. (2013). Eyes on bullying in early childhood. Waltham, MA: Education Development Center. Retrieved fromwww.eyesonbullying.org
23.
TrentacostaC. J.FineS. E. (2010). Emotion knowledge, social competence, and behavior problems in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review. Social Development, 19, 1–29.
24.
TurielE. (2006). Thought, emotion, and social interactional processes in moral development. In KillenM.SmetanaJ. G. (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 7–35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
VaughnB. E.SantosA. J.CoppolaG. (2014). Q-methodology and Q-sorting as tools for addressing research questions in educational settings. Historical overview and illustrations using three standardized Q-Sets. In SarachoO. N. (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in early childhood education (pp. 175–202). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
26.
VlachouM.AndreouE.BotsoglouK.DidaskalouE. (2011). Bully/victim problems among preschool children: A review of current research evidence. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 329–358.
27.
WatersE.NoyesD.VaughnB. E.RicksM. (1985). Q-Sort definitions of social competence and self-esteem: Discriminant validity of related constructs in theory and data. Developmental Psychology, 17, 275–288.
