Previous research indicates that monolingual infants have difficulty learning minimal pairs (i.e., words differing by one phoneme) produced by a speaker uncharacteristic of their language environment and that bilinguals might share this difficulty. To clearly reveal infants’ underlying phonological representations, we minimized task demands by embedding target words in naming phrases, using a fully crossed, between-subjects experimental design. We tested 17-month-old French-English bilinguals’ (N = 30) and English monolinguals’ (N = 31) learning of a minimal pair (/k∊m/ – /g∊m/) produced by an adult bilingual or monolingual. Infants learned the minimal pair only when the speaker matched their language environment. This vulnerability to subtle changes in word pronunciation reveals that neither monolingual nor bilingual 17-month-olds possess fully generalizable phonological representations.
AntoniouM.BestC. T.TylerM. D.KroosC. (2011). Inter-language interference in VOT production by L2-dominant bilinguals: Asymmetries in phonetic code-switching. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 558–570. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2011.03.001
2.
BergelsonE.SwingleyD. (2012). At 6 to 9 months, human infants know the meanings of many common nouns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 109, 3253–3258. doi:10.1073/pnas.1113380109
3.
BestC. T.TylerM. D.GoodingT. N.OrlandoC. B.QuannC. A. (2009). Development of phonological constancy: Toddlers’ perception of native- and Jamaican- accented words. Psychological Science, 20, 539–542. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02327.x
4.
BoersmaP.WeenikD. (2012). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.1. Retrieved fromhttp://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/
5.
BoschL.Ramon-CasasM. (2011). Variability in vowel production by bilingual speakers: Can input properties hinder the early stabilization of contrastive categories?Journal of Phonetics, 39, 514–526. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2011.02.001
6.
BoschL.Sebastián-GallésN. (2001). Evidence of early language discrimination abilities in infants from bilingual environments. Infancy, 2, 29–49. doi:10.1207/S15327078IN0201_3
7.
Byers-HeinleinK. (2013). Parental language mixing: Its measurement and the relation of mixed input to young bilingual children’s vocabulary size. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 32–48. doi:10.1017/S1366728911000010
8.
Byers-HeinleinK.FennellC. T. (2013). Perceptual narrowing in the context of increased variation: Insights from bilingual infants. Developmental Psychobiology, 56, 274–291. doi:10.1002/dev.21167
9.
Byers-HeinleinK.FennellC. T.WerkerJ. F. (2012). The development of associative word learning in monolingual and bilingual infants. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 198–205. doi:10.1017/S1366728912000417
10.
CaramazzaA.Yeni-KomshianG. H. (1974). Voice onset time in two French dialects. Journal of Phonetics, 2, 239–245.
11.
CaramazzaA.Yeni-KomshianG. H.ZurifE. B.CarboneE. (1973). The acquisition of a new phonological contrast: The case of stop consonants in French–English bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54, 421–428.
12.
CristiàA. (2011). Fine-grained variation in caregivers’ /s/ predicts their infants’ /s/ category. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129, 3271–3280.
13.
CurtinS.Byers-HeinleinK.WerkerJ. F. (2011). Bilingual beginnings as a lens for theory development: PRIMIR in focus. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 492–504. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2010.12.002
14.
FennellC. T. (2012). Object familiarity enhances infants’ use of phonetic detail in novel words. Infancy, 17, 339–353. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7078.2011.00080.x
15.
FennellC. T.Byers-HeinleinK.WerkerJ. F. (2007). Using speech sounds to guide word learning: The case of bilingual infants. Child Development, 78, 1510–1525. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01080.x
16.
FennellC. T.WaxmanS. R. (2010). What paradox? Referential cues allow for infant use of phonetic detail in word learning. Child Development, 81, 1376–1383.
17.
FlegeJ. E.EeftingW. (1987). Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 67–83.
18.
GonzalesK.LottoA. J. (2013). A bafri, un pafri: Bilinguals’ pseudoword identifications support language-specific phonetic systems. Psychological Science, 24, 2135–2142. doi:10.1177/0956797613486485
19.
HazanV. L.BoulakiaG. (1993). Perception and production of a voicing contrast by French–English bilinguals. Language and Speech, 36, 17–38.
20.
HillenbrandJ.GettyL. A.ClarkM. J.WheelerK. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3099–3111.
21.
KuhlP. K.StevensE.HayashiA.DeguchiT.KiritaniS.IversonP. (2006). Infants show a facilitation effect for native language phonetic perception between 6 and 12 months. Developmental Science, 9, F13–F21.
22.
LiskerL.AbramsonA. S (1967). Some effects of context on voice onset time in English stops. Language and Speech, 10, 1–28.
23.
MackenzieH.CurtinS.GrahamS. A. (2012). 12-month-olds’ phonotactic knowledge guides their word-object mappings. Child Development, 83, 1129–1136. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01764.x
24.
MacLeodA. A. N.Stoel-GammonC. (2009). The use of voice onset time by early bilinguals to distinguish homorganic stops in Canadian English and Canadian French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 53–77. doi:10.1017/S0142716408090036
25.
MartinP. (2002). La système vocalique du français du Québec de l’acoustique à la phonologie [The vowel system of Québec French from acoustics to phonology.]La Linguistique, 38, 71–88.
26.
MattockK.PolkaL.RvachewS.KrehmM. (2010). The first steps in word learning are easier when the shoes fit: Comparing monolingual and bilingual infants. Developmental Science, 13, 229–243. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00891.x
27.
MulakK. E.BestC. T.TylerM. D.KitamuraC.IrwinJ. (2013). Development of phonological constancy: 19-month-olds, but not 15-month-olds, identify familiar words spoken in a non-native regional accent. Child Development, 84, 2064–2078. doi:10.1111/cdev.12087
28.
PiskeT.MacKayI. R.FlegeJ. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215. doi:10.1006/jpho.2001.0134
29.
PolkaL.ColantonioC.SundaraM. (2001). A crosslanguage comparison of / d / – / ð / perception: Evidence for a new developmental pattern. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 2190–2201. doi:10.1121/1.1362689
30.
RostG. C.McMurrayB. (2010). Finding the signal by adding noise: The role of noncontrastive phonetic variability in early word learning. Infancy, 15, 608–635. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7078.2010.00033.x
31.
RyallsJ.ClicheA.Fortier-BlancJ.CoulombeI.Prud’hommeauxA. (1997). Voice-onset time in younger and older French-speaking Canadians. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 11, 205–212.
32.
SchmaleR.HollichG.SeidlA. (2011). Contending with foreign accent in early word learning. Journal of Child Language, 38, 1096.1108. doi:10.1017/S0305000910000619
33.
Sebastián-GallésN.BoschL. (2002). Building phonotactic knowledge in bilinguals: Role of early exposure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 974–989. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.28.4.974
34.
SundaraM.PolkaL.BaumS. (2006). Production of coronal stops by simultaneous bilingual adults. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 97–114.
35.
ThiessenE.YeeM. (2010). Dogs, bogs, labs, and lads: What phonemic generalizations indicate about the nature of children’s early word-form representations. Child Development, 81, 1287–1303.
36.
WaxmanS. R.GelmanS. A. (2009). Early word-learning entails reference, not merely associations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13
, 258–263. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.03.006
37.
WerkerJ. F. (2012). Perceptual foundations of bilingual acquisition in infancy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1251, 50–61. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06484.x
38.
WerkerJ. F.Byers-HeinleinK.FennellC. T. (2009). Bilingual beginnings to learning words. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1536), 3649–3663. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0105
39.
WerkerJ. F.CohenL.LloydV.CasasolaM.StagerC. (1998). Acquisition of word-object associations by 14-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 34, 1289–1309.
40.
WerkerJ. F.CurtinS. (2005). PRIMIR: A developmental framework of infant speech processing. Language Learning and Development, 1, 197–234.
41.
WerkerJ. F.FennellC. T. (2004). From listening to sounds to listening to words: Early steps in word learning. In HallD. G.WaxmanS. R. (Eds.), Weaving a lexicon (pp. 79–109). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42.
WerkerJ. F.FennellC. T.CorcoranK. M.StagerC. L. (2002). Infants’ ability to learn phonetically similar words: Effects of age and vocabulary size. Infancy, 3, 1–30.
43.
WerkerJ. F.TeesR. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior & Development, 7, 49–63.
