Attention-orienting and attention-holding effects of faces were investigated in a sample of 64 children, aged 4 to 8 months old. A visual preference task was used, in which pairs of faces and toys were presented in eight 10-second trials. Effects of age and sitting-ability were examined. Attention-orienting toward faces was measured using the direction of infants’ first looks toward faces. The effect of attention-holding of faces was measured by calculating infants’ face preference scores at 1-second time intervals across the duration of each trial. Faces were not found to attract infants’ first looks significantly more than chance. However, during the first second of looking-time, infants displayed a face preference that was maintained throughout trial length. This attention-holding effect by faces was not related to sitting-ability or age.
CashonC. H.CohenL. B. (2004). Beyond U-shaped development in infants’ processing of faces. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5, 59–80. doi:10.1207/s15327647jcd0501_4
2.
CashonC. H.DeNicolaC. A. (2011). Is perceptual narrowing too narrow?Journal of Cognition and Development, 12(2), 159–162. doi:10.1080/15248372.2011.563483
3.
CashonC. H.HaO.AllenC. A.BarnaA. C. (2012). A U-shaped relation between sitting ability and upright face processing in infants. Child Development. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/cdev.12024
4.
CohenL. B. (1972). Attention-getting and attention-holding processes of infant visual preferences. Child Development, 43, 869–879. doi:10.2307/1127638
5.
CohenL. B. (1976). Habituation of infant visual attention. In: TigheT. J.LeatonR. N. (Eds.), Habituation: Perspectives from child development, animal behavior, and neurophysiology. (pp. 207–238). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
6.
CohenL. B.AtkinsonD. J.ChaputH. H.
(2004). HabitX: A new program for obtaining and organizing data in infant perception and cognition studies (Version 1.0). Austin: Texas.
7.
CohenL. B.CashonC. H. (2001). Do 7-month-old infants process independent features or facial configurations?Infant and Child Development, 10, 83–92. doi:10.1002/icd.250
8.
Di GiorgioE.TuratiC.AltoèG.SimionF. (2012). Face detection in complex visual displays: An eye-tracking study with 3- and 6-month-old infants and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 66–77. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.04.012
9.
EasterbrookM. A.KisilevskyB. S.MuirD. W.LaplanteD. P. (1999). Newborns discriminate schematic faces from scrambled faces. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 53, 231–241. doi:10.1037/h0087312
10.
FantzR. L. (1961). The origin of form perception. Scientific American, 204(5), 66–72. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0561-66
11.
FantzR. L. (1963). Pattern vision in newborn infants. Science, 140, 296–297. doi:10.1126/science.140.3564.296
12.
FergusonK. T.KulkofskyS.CashonC. H.CasasolaM. (2009). The development of specialized processing of own-race faces. Infancy, 14, 263–284. doi:10.1080/15250000902839369
13.
FrankM. C.VulE.JohnsonS. P. (2009). Development of infants’ attention to faces during the first year. Cognition, 110, 160–170. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.010
GorenC. C.SartyM.WuP. Y. K. (1975) Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. Pediatrics, 56, 544–549.
16.
HabitX: A new program for obtaining and organizing data in infant perception and cognition studies (Version 1.0) [Computer software]. Austin: University of Texas.
17.
JohnsonM. H.DziurawiecS.EllisH.MortonJ. (1991). Newborns’ preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition, 40, 1–19. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(91)90045-6
18.
LibertusK.
(2008). Preferential Looking Coder (Version 1.3.2) [Coding Software]. Durham, NC: Duke University. Retrieved October 9, 2009. Available fromklaus.libertus@duke.edu
19.
LibertusK.NeedhamA. (2011). Reaching experience increases face preference in 3-month-old infants. Developmental Science, 14, 1355–1364. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01084.x
20.
MortonJ.JohnsonM. H. (1991). CONSPEC and CONLERN: A two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychological Review, 98, 164–181. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.164
21.
Preferential Looking Coder (Version 1.3.2) [Coding Software]. Durham, NC: Duke University. Available fromklaus.libertus@duke.edu
22.
TottenhamN.TanakaJ.LeonA. C.McCarryT.NurseM.HareT. A., …Nelson, C. (2009). The NimStim set of facial expressions: judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research, 168, 242–249. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2008.05.006
23.
ValenzaE.SimionF.CassiaV.UmiltàC. (1996). Face preference at birth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 892–903. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.22.4.892
