Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The present study investigated whether infants visually scan own- and other-race faces differently as well as how these differences in face scanning develop with age. A multi-method approach was used to analyze the eye-tracking data of 6- and 9-month-old Caucasian infants scanning dynamically displayed own- and other-race faces. We found that 6-month-olds showed differential fixation, fixating significantly more on the left eye and mouth of own-race faces, but more on the nose of other-race faces. Infants at 9 months of age fixated more on the eyes of own-race faces, but more on the mouth of other-race faces. A scan path analysis revealed that infants shifted their attention between the eyes of the own-race faces significantly more frequently than for other-race faces. Overall, younger and older infants responded differentially to own- versus other-race faces not only in the absolute amount of time spent fixating specific features, but also on their fixation shifts between features.

Keywords

eye-tracking face processing other-race effect

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anzures

Quinn

P. C.

Pascalis

Slater

A. M.

Lee

(2010). Categorization, categorical perception, and asymmetry in infants’ representation of face race. Developmental Science, 13, 553–564.

Bar-Haim

Ziv

Lamy

Hodes

R. M.

(2006). Nature and nurture in own-race processing. Psychological Science, 17, 159–163.

Blais

Jack

R. E.

Scheepers

Fiset

Caldara

(2008). Culture shapes how we look at faces. PLoS ONE, 3, e3022. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003022

Caldara

Miellet

(2011). iMap: A novel method for statistical fixation mapping of eye movement data. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 864–878.

Chauvin

Worsely

K. J.

Schyns

P. G.

Arguin

Gosselin

(2005). Accurate statistical tests for smooth classification images. Journal of Vision, 5, 659–667.

C. S.

Wang

Quinn

P. C.

Lee

(2012). Adults scan own- and other-race faces differently. PLoS ONE, 7, e37688. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037688

Hains

S. M. J.

Muir

D. W.

(1996). Infant sensitivity to adult eye direction. Child Development, 67, 1940–1951.

Hugenberg

Young

Bernstein

Sacco

D. F.

(2010). The categorization-individuation model: An integrative account of the cross race recognition deficit. Psychological Review, 117, 1168–1187.

Kelly

D. J.

Liu

Quinn

P. C.

Slater

A. M.

Lee

Pascalis

(2007). Cross-race preferences for same-race faces extend beyond the African versus Caucasian contrast in 3-month-old infants. Infancy, 11, 87–95.

10.

Kelly

D. J.

Quinn

P. C.

Slater

A. M.

Lee

Pascalis

(2007). The other-race effect develops during infancy: Evidence of perceptual narrowing. Psychological Science, 18, 1084–1089.

11.

Kelly

D. J.

Quinn

P. C.

Slater

A. M.

Lee

Gibson

Smith

Pascalis

(2005). Three-month-olds, but not newborns, prefer own-race faces. Developmental Science, 8, F31–F36.

12.

Lee

Anzures

Quinn

P. C.

Pascalis

Slater

(2011). Development of face processing expertise. In Calder

A. J.

Rhodes

Johnson

M. H.

Haxby

J. V.

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of face perception (pp. 753–778). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

13.

Lewkowicz

D. J.

Hansen-Tift

(2012). Infants deploy selective attention to the mouth of a talking face when learning speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi:10.1073/pnas.1114783109

14.

Liu

Quinn

P. C.

Wheeler

Xiao

Lee

(2011). Similarity and difference in the processing of same- and other-race faces as revealed by eye-tracking in 4- to 9-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 180–189.

15.

Meissner

C. A.

Brigham

J. C.

(2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 3–35.

16.

Maurer

LeGrand

Mondloch

C. J.

(2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 255–260.

17.

Maurer

Salapatek

(1976). Developmental changes in the scanning of faces by young infants. Child Development, 47, 523–527.

18.

Quinn

P. C.

Tanaka

J. W.

(2009). Infants’ processing of featural and configural information in the upper and lower halves of the face. Infancy, 14, 474–487.

19.

Quinn

P. C.

Yahr

Kuhn

Slater

A. M.

Pascalis

(2002). Representation of the gender of human faces by infants: A preference for females. Perception, 31, 1109–1121.

20.

Shutts

Kinzler

(2007). An ambiguous-race illusion in children’s face memory. Psychological Science, 18, 763–767.

21.

Simion

Valenza

Cassia

V. M.

Turati

Umilta

(2002). Newborns’ preference for up–down asymmetrical configurations. Developmental Science, 5, 427–434.

22.

Tanaka

J. W.

Kiefer

Bukach

C. M.

(2004). A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: Evidence from a cross-cultural study. Cognition, 93, 1–9.

23.

Wheeler

Anzures

Quinn

P. C.

Pascalis

Omrin

D. S.

Lee

(2011). Caucasian infants scan own- and other-race faces differently. PLoS ONE, 6, e18621. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018621

Development of face scanning for own- and other-race faces in infancy

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References