This study examines selection and influence related to delinquent behaviors of immigrant and nonimmigrant adolescents attending three majority-immigrant schools (54% to 65.2% immigrant) and four minority-immigrant schools (11.1% to 25.1% immigrant) in one community. The sample included 1,169 youths (50.4% male; 24.2% immigrant) initially between the ages of 12 and 16 years (M =13.92, SD = 0.85). Results showed that immigrant and nonimmigrant adolescents were similar to their peers on delinquent behaviors, and peer selection and social influence operated in a complementary manner to explain this similarity. The processes did not differ between immigrants and nonimmigrants or between school contexts, suggesting that immigrants do not differ from nonimmigrants on either the prevalence or the processes behind delinquency.
AseltineR. H. (1995). A reconsideration of parental and peer influences on adolescent deviance. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, 103–121.
2.
BaerveldtC.Van DuijnM. A. J.VermeijL.Van HemertD. A. (2004). Ethnic boundaries and personal choice: Assessing the influence of individual inclinations to choose intra-ethnic relationships on pupils’ networks. Social Networks, 26, 55–74.
3.
BerndtT. J.KeefeK. (1995). Friends’ influence on adolescents’ adjustment to school. Child Development, 66, 1312–1329.
4.
Brottsförebyggande rådet (The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention). (2005). Brottslighet bland personer födda i Sverige och i utlandet[Crime among people born in Sweden and abroad]. Report 2005, no. 17. Stockholm, Sweden: Brottsförebyggande rådet.
5.
BurkW. J.KerrM.StattinH. (2008). The co-evolution of early adolescent friendship networks, school involvement and delinquent behaviors. Revue Française de Sociologie, 49, 499–522.
6.
BurkW. J.SteglichC. E. G.SnijdersT. A. B. (2007). Beyond dyadic interdependence: Actor-oriented models for co-evolving social networks and individual behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 397–404.
7.
ByrneD. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York, NY: Academic.
8.
CairnsR. B.CairnsB. D. (1994). Lifelines and risks: Pathways of youth in our time. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
9.
DishionT. J.SpracklenK. M.AndrewsD. W.PattersonG. R. (1996). Deviancy training in male adolescents friendships. Behavior Therapy, 27, 373–390.
10.
EnnettS. T.BaumanK. E. (1994). The contribution of influence and selection to adolescent peer group homogeneity: The case of adolescent cigarette smoking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 653–663.
11.
EricksonK, G.CrosnoeR.DornbuschS. M. (2000). A social process model of adolescent deviance: Combining social control and differential association perspectives. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29, 395–425.
12.
KandelD. B. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. The American Journal of Sociology, 84, 427–436.
13.
KerrM.StattinH.BurkW. J. (2010). A reinterpretation of parental monitoring in longitudinal perspective. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 39–64.
14.
KerrM.StattinH.KiesnerJ. (2007). Peers and problem behavior: Have we missed something? In EngelsR. C. M. E.KerrM.StattinH. (Eds.), Friends, lovers and groups: Key relationships in adolescence. Hot topics in developmental research (pp. 125–153). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
15.
KiesnerJ.CadinuM.PoulinF.BucciM. (2002). Group identification in early adolescence: Its relation with peer adjustment and its moderator effect on peer influence. Child Development, 73, 196–208.
16.
KiesnerJ.KerrM.StattinH. (2004). “Very important persons” in adolescence: Going beyond in-school, single friendships in the study of peer homophily. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 545–560.
17.
KirkeD. M. (2004). Chain reactions in adolescents’ cigarette, alcohol and drug use: Similarity through peer influence or the patterning of ties in peer networks?Social Networks, 26, 3–28.
18.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
19.
MoffittT. E. (2006). Life-course-persistent versus adolescence-limited antisocial behavior. In CicchettiD.CohenD. J. (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology. Vol. 3: Risk, disorder, and adaptation (pp. 570–598). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
20.
OettingE. R.BeauvaisF. (1987). Peer cluster theory, socialization characteristics, and adolescent drug use: A Path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 205–213.
21.
ReitzelL. R.MazasC. A.Cofta-WoerpelL.VidrineJ. I.BusinelleM. S.KendzorD., … Wetter, D. W. (2010). Acculturative and neighborhood influences on subjective social status among Spanish-speaking Latino immigrant smokers. Social Science & Medicine, 70, 677–683.
22.
RipleyR. M.SnijdersT. A. B.PreciadoP. (2011). Manual for SIENA version 4.0(version December 11 2011). Oxford, UK: University of Oxford, Department of Statistics, Nuffield College. Retrieved fromhttp://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/siena/
23.
SamD. L.VedderP.WardC.HorenczykG. (2006). Psychological and sociocultural adaptation of immigrant youths. In BerryJ. W.PhinneyJ. S.SamD. L.VedderP. (Eds.), Immigrant youths in cultural transitions: Acculturation, identity and adaptation across national contexts (pp. 117–141). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24.
SampsonR. J.GrovesW. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. The American Journal of Sociology, 4, 774–802.
SnijdersT. A. B.BaerveldtC. (2003). A multi-level study of the effects of delinquent behavior on friendship evolution. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 27, 123–151.
27.
SnijdersT. A. B.SteglichC. E. G.SchweinbergerM.HuismanM. (2007). Manual for SIENA version 3.1. Groningen, the Netherlands: University of Groningen.
28.
SnijdersT. A. B.van de BuntG. G.SteglichC. E. G. (2010). Introduction to actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44–60.
29.
TitzmannP.SilbereisenR.Schmitt-RodermundE. (2007). Friendship homophily among diaspora migrant adolescents in Germany and Israel. European Psychologist, 12, 181–195.
30.
van GeelM.VedderP. (2010). The adaptation of non-western and Muslim immigrant adolescents in the Netherlands: An immigrant paradox?Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 5, 398–402.
31.
VermeijL.van DuijnM. A. J.BaerveldtC. (2009). Ethnic segregation in context: Social discrimination among native Dutch pupils and their ethnic minority classmates. Social Networks, 31, 230–239.
32.
WilsonT.KarimpourR.RodkinP. C. (2011). African American and European American students’ peer groups during early adolescence: Structure, status, and academic achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 31, 74–98.
