In 2006, the Finnish Ministry of Education mandated our research group to develop an antibullying program for comprehensive schools. The new program, KiVa, includes both universal and indicated actions to reduce bullying. The present study reports the effects of KiVa on nine different forms of being bullied in a sample of 5,651 fourth to sixth graders from 78 schools (39 intervention, 39 control). The findings showed positive effects on each form of being bullied assessed. After 9 months of intervention, control school students were 1.32— 1.94 times as likely to be bullied as students in intervention schools. A well-designed, research-based program can thus reduce multiple forms of being bullied, and there might be no need to develop specific programs for different forms of bullying.
Andreou, E., & Metallidou, P. (2004). The relationship of academic and social cognition to behaviour in bullying situations among Greek primary school children. Educational Psychology, 24, 27-41.
2.
Björkqvist, K., Ekman, K., & Lagerspetz, K.M.J. (1982). Bullies and victims: Their ego picture, ideal ego picture, and normative ego picture. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 23, 307-313.
3.
Camodeca, M., & Goossens, F.A. (2005). Children’s opinions on effective strategies to cope with bullying: The importance of bullying role and perspective. Educational Research, 47, 93-105.
4.
Caravita, S., Di Blasio, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Unique and interactive effects of empathy and social status on involvement in bullying. Social Development, 18(1), 140-163.
5.
Ferguson, C., San Miguel, C., Kilburn, J., & Sanchez, P. ( 2007). The effectiveness of school-based anti-bullying programs: A meta-analytic review. Criminal Justice Review, 32, 401-414.
6.
Goossens, F.A., Olthof, T., & Dekker, P.H. ( 2006). New Participant Role Scales: Comparison between various criteria for assigning roles and indications for their validity. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 343-357.
7.
Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T., Poskiparta, E., Kaljonen, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: Grades 4-6. Child Development , 82, 311-330.
8.
Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). Vulnerable children in varying classroom contexts: Bystanders’ behaviors moderate the effects of risk factors on victimization. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly , 56, 261-282.
9.
Lagerspetz, K.M.J., Björkqvist, K., Berts, M., & King, E. ( 1982). Group aggression among school children in three schools . Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 23, 45-52.
10.
Menesini, E., Codecasa, E., Benelli, B., & Cowie, H. ( 2003). Enhancing children’s responsibility to take action against bullying: Evaluation of a befriending intervention in Italian middle schools. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 10-14.
11.
Olweus D. ( 1996). The Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Bergen, Norway: Research Center for Health Promotion (HEMIL Center), University of Bergen.
12.
Olweus, D. ( 2001). Peer harassment: A critical analysis and some important issues. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 1-20). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
13.
Olweus, D. ( 2004). The Olweus bullying prevention programme: Design and implementation issues and a new national initiative in Norway. In P. K. Smith, D. Pepler , & K. Rigby (Eds.), Bullying in schools: How successful can interventions be? (pp. 13-36). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Pöyhönen, V., Juvonen, J., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). What does it take to defend the victimized peer? The interplay between personal and social factors. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56, 143-163.
15.
Sainio, M., Veenstra, R., Huitsing, G., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). Victims and their defenders: A dyadic approach. International Journal of Behavioral Development , 35, 144-151.
16.
Salmivalli, C. ( 2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112-120.
17.
Salmivalli, C., Garandeau, C., & Veenstra, R. (in press). KiVa anti-bullying program: Implications for school adjustment . In G. Ladd & A. Ryan (Eds.), Peer relationships and adjustment at school.
18.
Salmivalli, C., Kärnä, A., & Poskiparta, E. (2010a). From peer putdowns to peer support: A theoretical model and how it translated into a national anti-bullying program. In S. Shimerson, S. Swearer, & D. Espelage (Eds.), The handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 441-454). New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
Salmivalli, C., Kärnä, A., & Poskiparta, E. (2010b). Development, evaluation, and diffusion of a national anti-bullying program, KiVa. In B. Doll, W. Pfohl , & J. Yoon (Eds.), Handbook of youth prevention science (pp. 240-254). New York, NY : Routledge.
20.
Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1-15.
21.
Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. ( 2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviors associated with bullying in schools. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 246-258.
22.
Salmivalli, C., Voeten, M., & Poskiparta, E. (in press). Bystanders matter: Associations between defending, reinforcing, and the frequency of bullying in classrooms . Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology.
23.
Schäfer, M., & Korn, S. ( 2004). Bullying als Gruppenphänomen: Eine Adaptation des ‘‘Participant Role’’-Ansatzes [Bullying as a group phenomenon: Adaptation of the ‘‘Participant role’’ approach]. Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie , 36, 19-29.
24.
Smith, J.D., Schneider, B.H., Smith, P.K., & Ananiadou, K. ( 2004). The effectiveness of whole-school antibullying programs: A synthesis of evaluation research. School Psychology Review , 33, 547-560.
25.
Solberg, M.E., & Olweus, D. ( 2003). Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 239-268.
26.
Sutton, J., & Smith, P.K. ( 1999). Bullying as a group process: An adaptation of the participant role approach. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 97-111.
27.
Ttofi, M., Farrington, D.P., & Baldry, A.C. ( 2008). Effectiveness of programmes to reduce school bullying: A systematic review (Report prepared for The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention). Västerås, Sweden: Edita Norstedts.
28.
Vreeman, R.C., & Carroll, A.E. ( 2007). A systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent bullying. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 161, 78-88.
29.
Woods, S., & Wolke, D. ( 2003). Does the content of anti-bullying policies inform us about the prevalence of direct and relational bullying behaviour in primary schools? Educational Psychology, 23, 381-401.
