This study examined what kinds of groups can be identified according to students’ task-values across four subject domains (languages, math and science, social sciences, practical subjects) and the related gender differences using a person-centered approach. Latent class analysis was applied to classify 638 students (mean age = 15) into four task-value groups, namely, all-subjects (55%), practical-subjects (5.7%), high-math-and-science (20.2%) and low-math-and-science (19.1%) groups. Significant gender differences were found: boys dominated the high-math-and-science group (boys = 98%), while girls dominated the low-math-and-science group (girls = 82%). Compared to the low-math-and-science group, the high-math-and-science group reported a stronger tendency in furthering their studies immediately after the completion of compulsory education.
Durik, A.M., Vida, M., & Eccles, J.S. ( 2006). Task values and ability beliefs as predictors of high school literacy choices: A developmental analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 382-393.
2.
Eccles [Parsons], J.S. ( 1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75-146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
3.
Eccles, J.S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. ( 1998). Motivation to succeed. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 1017-1095). New York, NY: Wiley.
4.
Farmer, H.S., Wardrop, J.L., & Rotella, S.C. ( 1999). Antecedent factors differentiating women and men in science/nonscience careers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 763-780.
5.
Finnish National Board of Education. (2004 ). National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2004: National core curriculum for basic education intended for pupils in compulsory education . Vammala: Vammalan Kirjapaino Oy . Retrieved from http://www.oph.fi/english/publications/2009/national_core_curricula_for_basci_education
6.
Jacobs, J.E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D.W., Eccles, J.S., & Wigfield, A. ( 2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73, 509-527.
7.
Lubke, G.H., & Muthén, B. (2007). Performance of factor mixture models as a function of model size, criterion measure effects, and class-specific parameters. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 26-47.
8.
Marsh, H.W., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Morin, AJ. S. (2009). Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: synergy of person- and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 191-225.
9.
Meece, J.L., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J.S. ( 1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents’ course enrollment intentions and performance in mathematics . Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 60-70.
10.
Muthén, B. ( 2002). Beyond SEM: General latent variable modeling. Behaviormetrika, 29, 81-117.
11.
Muthén, B. ( 2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 345-368). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
12.
Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2007). Mplus (Version 5). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén .
13.
Niemivirta, M. ( 2002). Task-value scale. FinlandUniversity of Helsinki.
14.
Nylund, K.L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling. A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535-569.
15.
Simpkins, S.D., Davis-Kean, P.E., & Eccles, J.S. ( 2005). Parental socialization and children’s engagement in information technology activities. Applied Developmental Science, 9, 14-30.
16.
Simpkins, S.D., Davis-Kean, P.E., & Eccles, J.S. ( 2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology , 42(1), 70-83.
17.
Smith, G.W., & Shevlin, M. ( 2008). Patterns of alcohol consumption and related behavior in Great Britain: A latent class analysis of the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT). Alcohol & Alcoholism, 43(5), 590-594.
18.
Updegraff, K.A., Eccles, J.S., Barber, B.L., & O’Brien, K.M. (1996). Course enrollment as self-regulatory behavior: Who takes optional high school math courses? Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 239-259.
19.
Vermunt, J.K., & Magidson, J. ( 2002). Latent class cluster analysis. In J. A. Hagenaars & A. L. McCutcheon (Eds.), Applied latent class analysis (pp. 89-106). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
20.
Viljaranta, J., Nurmi, J.-E., Aunola, K., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2009). The role of task values in adolescents’ educational tracks: A person-oriented approach. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19(4), 786-798.
21.
Watt, H.M.G. ( 2005). Explaining gendered math enrolments for NSW Australian secondary school students. New Directions in Child and Adolescent Development, 110(Winter), 15-29.
22.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. ( 1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265-310.
