We compared the predictive validity of five aggregation methods for multiple informant data on child and adolescent behavior problems. In addition, we compared the predictive validity of these aggregation methods with single informant scores. Data were derived from the Minnesota Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (N = 175). Maternal and teacher reports of child behavior problems were obtained at ages 7 and 16 using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and Teacher Report Form (TRF). Adolescent self-report of child behavior problems was obtained at age 16 (Youth Self-Report). Adolescent psychopathology data was obtained at age 17.5 using a semi-structured diagnostic interview (The Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia; K-SADS). Results generally showed that the latent variable performed better in predicting adolescent psychopathology compared to the other aggregation methods and single informant scores. The other aggregation methods did not, however, outperform the single informant scores.
Achenbach, T.M. ( 1991a). Manual for the CBCL/4-18 and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry .
2.
Achenbach, T.M. ( 1991b). Manual for the TRF and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry .
3.
Achenbach, T.M. ( 1991c). Manual for the Youth Self-Report and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry .
4.
Achenbach, T.M. ( 1995). Epidemiological applications of multiaxial empirically based assessment and taxonomy. In F.C. Verhulst & H.M. Koot (Eds.), The epidemiology of child and adolescent psychopathology (pp. 22-41). Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press.
5.
Achenbach, T.M., & Edelbrock, C.S. (1978). The classification of child psychopathology: A review and analysis of empirical efforts. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1275-1301.
6.
Achenbach, T.M., Krukowski, R.A., Dumenci, L., & Ivanova, M.Y. ( 2005). Assessment of adult psychopathology: Meta-analyses and implications of cross-informant correlations. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 361-382.
7.
Achenbach, T.M., & McConaughy, S.H. (1997). Empirically based assessment of child and adolescent psychopathology: Practical applications. Developmental Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry Series (Vol. 13, 2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
8.
Achenbach, T.M., McConaughy, S.H., & Howell, C.T. ( 1987). Child/ adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213-222.
9.
Burt, K.B., van Dulmen, M.H.M., Carlivati, J., Egeland, B., Sroufe, L.A., Forman, D.R., ... Carlson, E.A. ( 2005). Mediating links between maternal depression and offspring psychopathology: The importance of independent data. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 46, 490-499.
10.
Curran, P.J., West, S., & Finch, J.F. ( 1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16-23.
11.
Duhig, A.M., Renk, K., Epstein, M.K., & Phares, V. ( 2000). Interparental agreement on internalizing, externalizing, and total behavior problems: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 7, 435-453.
12.
Fabrigar, L.R., Wegener, D.T., MacCallum, R.C., & Strahan, E.J. ( 1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299.
13.
Ge, X., Conger, R.D., Lorenz, F.O., & Simons, R.L. ( 1994). Parents’ stressful life events and adolescent depressed mood. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35, 28-44.
14.
Gizer, I.R., Waldman, I.D., Abramowitz, A., Barr, C.L., Feng, Y., Wigg, K.G., ... Rowe, D.C. ( 2008). Relations between multi-informant assessments of ADHD symptoms, DAT1, and DRD4. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 869-880.
Gunnar, M.R., van Dulmen, M.H.M., & The International Adoption Project Team ( 2007). Behavior problems in post-institutionalized internationally adopted children. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 129-148.
17.
Kim, J.-O., & Mueller, C.W. ( 1978). Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues . Quantitative applications in the social sciences series (No. 114). Beverly Hills, CA : Sage Publications.
18.
MacCallum, R.C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K.J., & Rucker, D.D. ( 2002). On the practice of dichotimization of quantitative variables , Psychological Methods, 7, 19-40.
19.
Offord, D.R., Boyle, M.H., Racine, Y., Szatmari, P., Fleming, J.E., Sanford, M., ... Lipman, E.L. ( 1996). Integrating assessment data from multiple informants . Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 35, 1078-1085.
20.
Piacentini, J.C., Cohen, P., & Cohen, J. ( 1992). Combining discrepant diagnostic information from multiple sources: Are complex algorithms better than simple ones. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 20, 51-63.
21.
Puig-Antich, J., & Chambers, W. ( 1978). The schedule of affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-aged children. New York, NY: New York Psychiatric Instititute.
22.
Rowe, D.C., & Kandel, D. ( 1997). In the eye of the beholder? Parental ratings of externalizing and internalizing symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology , 25, 265-275.
23.
Smith, S.R. ( 2007). Making sense of multiple informants in child and adolescent psychopathology. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 25, 139-149.
24.
Sroufe, L.A., Egeland, B., Carlson, E.A., & Collins, W.A. ( 2005). The development of the person: The Minnesota study of risk and adaptation from birth to adulthood. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
25.
Van der Ende, J. ( 1999). Multiple informants, multiple views. In H.M. Koot, A.A.M. Crijnen, & R.F. Ferdinand (Eds.), Child psychiatric epidemiology: Accomplishments and future directions (pp. 39-52). Assen , the Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
26.
Verhulst, F.C., Koot, H.M., & Van der Ende, J. (1994). Differential predictive value of parents’ and teachers’ reports of children’s problem behaviors: A longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 22, 531-546.
27.
Widaman, K.F. ( 1993). Common factor analysis versus principal component analysis: Differential bias in representing model parameters? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 263-311.
