Infants’ responses to typical and scrambled human body shapes were assessed in relation to the realism of the human body stimuli presented. In four separate experiments, infants were familiarized to typical human bodies and then shown a series of scrambled human bodies on the test. Looking behaviour was assessed in response to a range of different human body stimulus types including real people, mannequins, dolls and large human body photographs. Results were compared with previous experiments showing that when presented with small drawings, photographs or dolls, infants demonstrate knowledge about the whole human body shape only after their first birthday (Slaughter & Heron, 2004). In the current study, recognition of the typical human body shape was evident as early as 9 months of age when the stimuli were real humans, and infants’ responses to the various types of representations were linked to the realism of the portrayal. This pattern of findings indicates that even simple visual responses are not independent of the nature of the stimuli used to elicit them.
Brownell, C.A., Zerwas, S., & Ramani, G.B. ( 2007). So big: The development of body self-awareness in toddlers . Child Development, 78, 1426-1440.
2.
Chen, X., Reid, V.M., & Striano, T. ( 2006). Oral exploration and reaching toward social and non-social objects in two-, four-, and six-month-old infants. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 1-12.
3.
DeLoache, J.S. ( 1987). Rapid change in the symbolic functioning of very young children. Science, 238, 1556-1557.
4.
DeLoache, J.S. ( 2000). Dual representation and young children’s use of scale models. Child Development, 71, 329-338.
5.
DeLoache, J.S. ( 2004). Scale errors offer evidence for a perception-action dis- sociation early in life. Science, 304, 1027-1029.
6.
DeLoache, J.S., & Burns, N.M. ( 1993). Symbolic development in young children: Understanding models and pictures. In C. Pratt & A.F. Garton (Eds.), Systems of representation in children: Development and use (pp. 91-112). Oxford: Wiley.
7.
DeLoache, J.S., Kolstad, V., & Anderson, K.N. (1991). Physical similarity and young children’s understanding of scale models. Child Development, 62, 111-126.
8.
DeLoache, J.S., Pierroutsakos, S.L., Uttal, D.H., Rosengren, K.S., & Gottlieb, A. ( 1998). Grasping the nature of pictures. Psychological Science, 9, 205-210.
9.
DeLoache, J.S., Strauss, M.S., & Maynard, J. ( 1979). Picture perception in infancy. Infant Behavior & Development, 2, 77-89.
10.
Dirks, J., & Gibson, E. ( 1977). Infants’ perception of similarity between live people and their photographs. Child Development, 48, 124-130.
11.
Gallagher, S. ( 1995). Body schema and intentionality. In J.L. Bermudez, A.J. Marcel , & N. Eilan (Eds.), The body and the self (pp. 225-244). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
Ganea, P.A., Pickard, M.B., & DeLoache, J.S. (2008). Transfer between picture books and the real world by very young children. Journal of Cognition and Development, 9, 46-66.
13.
Goldenberg, G. ( 1997). Disorders of body perception. In M.J. Farah & T.E. Feinberg (Eds.), Behavioral neurology and neuropsychology (pp. 289-296). New York: McGraw-Hill.
14.
Hayne, H., Rovee-Collier, C., & Perris, E.E. ( 1987). Categorization and memory retrieval by three-month-olds . Child Development, 58, 750-767.
15.
Johnson, M.H., Dziurawiec, S., Ellis, H., & Morton, J. ( 1991). Newborns’ preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition, 40, 1-19.
16.
Johnson, M.H., & Morton, J. ( 1991). Biology and cognitive development: The case of face recognition . Oxford: Blackwell.
17.
Legerstee, M., Pomerleau, A., Malcuit, G., & Feider, H. ( 1987). The development of infants’ responses to people and a doll: Implications for research in communication. Infant Behavior & Development, 10, 81-95.
18.
Liben, L.S. ( 1999). Developing an understanding of external spatial representations . In Development of mental representation: Theories and applications (pp. 297-321). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19.
Mandler, J.M., & McDonough, L. ( 1998). Studies in inductive inference in infancy. Cognitive Psychology, 37, 60-96.
20.
Namy, L.L., Campbell, A.L., & Tomasello, M. ( 2004). The changing role of iconicity in non-verbal symbol learning: A U-shaped trajectory in the acquisition of arbitrary gestures. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5, 37-57.
21.
Pauen, S. ( 2000). Early differentiation within the animate domain: Are humans something special? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 75, 134-151.
22.
Pavlov, I.P. ( 1927). Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
Peirce, C.S. ( 1955). Logic as semiotic: The theory of signs. In J. Buchler (Ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce (pp. 98-119). New York: Dover Publications.
24.
Perner, J. ( 1991). Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
Pierroutsakos, S.L., & DeLoache, J.S. (2003). Infants’ manual exploration of pictorial objects varying in realism. Infancy, 4, 141-156.
26.
Pierroutsakos, S.L., & Troseth, G.L. ( 2003). Video verité: Infants’ manual investigation of objects on video. Infant Behavior & Development, 26, 183-199.
27.
Preissler, M.A., & Carey, S. ( 2004). Do both pictures and words function as symbols for 18- and 24-month-old children? Journal of Cognition and Development , 5, 185-212.
28.
Quinn, P.C., Eimas, P.D., & Tarr, M.J. ( 2001). Perceptual categorization of cat and dog silhouettes by 3- to 4-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 78-94.
29.
Rakison, D.H., & Cohen, L.B. ( 1999). Infants’ use of functional parts in basic-like categorization. Developmental Science, 2, 423-431.
30.
Reed, C.L. ( 2002). What is the body schema? In A.N. Meltzoff (Ed.), The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases. Cambridge studies in cognitive perceptual development (pp. 233-243). New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Rovee-Collier, C., & Hayne, H. ( 1987). Reactivation of infant memory: Implications for cognitive development. In H.W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 185-238). New York: Academic Press.
32.
Simcock, G., & DeLoache, J. ( 2006). Get the picture? The effects of iconicity on toddlers’ reenactment from picture books. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1352-1357.
33.
Simion, F., Valenza, E., & Umilta, C. ( 1998). Mechanisms underlying face preference at birth. In F. Simion & G. Butterworth (Eds.), The development of sensory, motor and cognitive capacities in early infancy: From perception to cognition (pp. 87-101). Hove : Psychology Press.
34.
Sirigu, A., Grafman, J., Bressler, K., & Sunderland, T. (1991). Multiple representations contribute to body knowledge processing. Brain, 114, 629-642.
35.
Slaughter, V., & Heron, M. ( 2004). Origins and early development of human body knowledge . Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 69.
36.
Stern, D.N. ( 2002). The first relationship: Infant and mother. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
37.
Striano, T., Tomasello, M., & Rochat, P. ( 2001). Social and object support for early symbolic play. Developmental Science, 4, 442-455.
38.
Suddendorf, T. ( 2003). Early representational insight: Twenty-four-month-olds can use a photo to find an object in the world. Child Development , 74, 896-904.
39.
Tomasello, M., Striano, T., & Rochat, P. ( 1999). Do young children use objects as symbols? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 563-584.
40.
Troseth, G.L., Pierroutsakos, S.L., & Deloache, J.S. (2004). From the innocent to the intelligent eye: The early development of pictorial competence. In R. Kail (Ed.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior (Vol. 32, pp. 1-35). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
41.
Ungerer, J.A., Zelazo, P.R., Kearsley, R.B., & O’Leary, K. (1981). Developmental changes in the representation of objects in symbolic play from 18 to 34 months of age. Child Development, 52, 186-195.
42.
Ware, E.A., Uttal, D.H., Wetter, E.K., & DeLoache, J.S. (2006). Young children make scale errors when playing with dolls. Developmental Science, 9, 40-45.
43.
Yonas, A., Granrud, C.E., Chov, M.H., & Alexander, A.J. (2005). Picture perception in infants: Do 9-month-olds attempt to grasp objects depicted in photographs? Infancy, 8, 147-166.
