Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The study explored how Chinese children spontaneously explained the causes of illness. Two groups of 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old children from different socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds were recruited, with 30 children in each age group. A group of 30 college students were also recruited and their responses compared to those produced by the children. Participants’ responses were coded as belonging to one of five mutually exclusive categories: psychogenic, biological, behavioral, symptomatic, or other. Results indicated that children’s causal explanations were mostly behavioral and symptomatic, with more biological explanations for older children than for younger. In contrast, adults’ explanations were mostly biological and psychogenic. Although adults were influenced by concepts in Chinese traditional medicine that tie negative emotions to illness, Chinese children did not mention emotional causes for illness. Nonetheless, Chinese children also offered some explanations based on concepts of “wind” and “cold,” which may be a result of cultural experience with some aspects of traditional Chinese medicine.

Keywords

Chinese traditional medicine culture illness naive biology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Au, T.K. , Romo, L.F. , & DeWitt, J.E. (1999). Considering children’s folkbiology in health education. In M. Siegal & C. Peterson (Eds.), Children’s understanding of biology and health (pp. 636-638). London: Cambridge University Press.

Au, T.K. , Sile, A.L. , & Rollins, K.B. ( 1993). Developing an intuitive understanding of conservation and contamination: Invisible particles as a plausible mechanism. Developmental Psychology, 29(2), 186-299.

Bibace, R. , & Walsh, M.E. ( 1980). Development of children’s concepts of illness . Pediatrics, 66, 912-917.

Carey, S. ( 1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cole, M. ( 2006). Culture and cognitive development in phylogenetic, historical, and ontogenetic perspective. In D. Kuhn & R.S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 636-683). Hoboken, NJ : Wiley.

Guo, Y. ( 2000). Family relations: The generation gap at the table . In Y. Ying (Ed.), Feeding China’s little emperors: Food, children, and social change (pp. 94-113). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Hatano, G. , & Inagaki, K. ( 1994). Young children’s naive theory of biology . Cognition, 50, 171-188.

Hatano, G. , & Inagaki, K. ( 2000). Domain-specific constraints of conceptual development . International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24, 267-275.

Inagaki, K. , & Hatano, G. ( 2006). Young children’s conception of the biological world . Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 15(4), 177-181.

10.

Kalish, C. ( 1996). Preschoolers’ understanding of germs as invisible mechanisms. Cognitive Development, 11, 83-106.

11.

Kalish, C. ( 1997). Preshoolers’ understanding of mental and bodily reactions to contamination: What you don’t know can hurt you, but can’t sadden you. Developmental Psychology, 33(1), 79-91.

12.

Kalish, C. ( 1999). What young children’s understanding of contamination and contagion tell us about their concepts of illness. In M. Sigeal & C.C. Peterson (Eds.), Children’s understanding of biology and health (pp. 97-130). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

13.

Keil, F.C. ( 1994). The birth and nurturance of concepts by domain: The origins of concepts of living things. In L.A. Hirschfeld & S.A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 234-254). New York: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Lynch, E. , & Medin, D. ( 2006). Explanatory models of illness: A study of within-culture variation. Cognitive Psychology, 53, 285-309.

15.

Medin, D.L. , & Atran, S. ( 2004). The native mind: Biological categorization and reasoning in development and across cultures. Psychological Review, 111, 960-983.

16.

Notaro, P.C. , Gelman, S.A. , & Zimmerman, M.A. (2001). Children’s understanding of psychogenic bodily reactions. Child Development, 72, 444-459.

17.

Payer, L. ( 1989). Medicine and culture: Varieties of treatment in the United States, England, West Germany, and France. New York: Penguin.

18.

Raman, L. , & Gelman, S.A. ( 2007). Children’s recognition of time in the causes and cures of physical and emotional reactions to illnesses and injuries. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 389-410.

19.

Raman, L. , & Winer, G.A. ( 2002). Children’s and adults’ understanding of illness: Evidence in support of a coexistence model. Genetic, Social, and General Mongraphs, 128, 325-355.

20.

Ross, N. , Medin, D. , Coley, J. , & Atran, S. ( 2003). Cultural and experiential differences in the development of folkbiological induction. Cognitive Development, 18, 25-47.

21.

Springer, K. , & Ruckel, J. ( 1992). Early beliefs about the causes of illness: Evidence against immanent justice. Cognitive Development, 7, 429-443.

22.

Wellman, H.M. , & Gelman, S.A. ( 1998). Knowledge acquisition in foundational domains . In W. Damon (Ed.-in-Chief), D. Kuhn, & R. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Cognition, perception and language: Handbook of child psychology,Vol. 2 (5th ed., pp. 523-573). New York: Wiley.

23.

Zhu, L. , & Fang, F. ( 2000). Chinese preschoolers’ understanding of biological phenomena - growth and aliveness. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 23(1), 105-110.

Chinese children’s explanations for illness

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References