Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Research on end-of-life (EOL) planning has largely focused on heterosexual couples, overlooking the experiences of sexual minority spouses. Using dyadic data from the Health and Relationships Project, this study applies a minority stress framework and dyadic perspective (i.e., considering both partner’s views) to examine how gay, lesbian, and heterosexual couples engage in informal (e.g., discussions) and formal (e.g., legal arrangements) planning. Multilevel logistic regressions assess how both spouses’ health, dementia concerns, social relationships, and experiences of discrimination shape planning behaviors. Results show that gay and lesbian couples are significantly more likely than different-sex couples to engage in both forms of planning. While marital quality, health, friendships, and discrimination are important predictors, they do not explain the observed group differences. This may suggest that same-sex couples are more motivated to plan ahead due to other unmeasured factors, including concerns about legal recognition, potential discrimination in healthcare, legal literacy, or community support.

Keywords

end-of-life planning marriage aging dyadic analysis sexual minorities

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bischoff

K. E.

Sudore

Miao

Boscardin

W. J.

Smith

A. K.

(2013). Advance care planning and the quality of end-of-life care in older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 61(2), 209–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12105

Carr

(2012a). Racial and ethnic differences in advance care planning: Identifying subgroup patterns and obstacles. Journal of Aging and Health, 24(6), 923–947. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264312449185

Carr

(2012b). The social stratification of older adults’ preparations for end-of-life health care. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 53(3), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146512455427

Carr

Khodyakov

(2007). End-of-Life health care planning among young-old adults: An assessment of psychosocial influences. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 62(2), S135–S141. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/62.2.S135

Carr

Luth

(2016). End-of-Life planning and health care. In Handbook of aging and the social sciences (pp. 375–394). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-417235-7.00018-4

Carr

Luth

E. A.

(2019). Well-being at the end of life. Annual Review of Sociology, 45, 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022524

Carr

Moorman

S. M.

Boerner

(2013). End-of-Life planning in a family context: Does relationship quality affect whether (and with whom) older adults plan? The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 68(4), 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt034

Carr

Springer

K. W.

(2010). Advances in families and health research in the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 743–761. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00728.x

Cherlin

A. J.

(2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 848–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00058.x

10.

Collins

P. H.

(2002). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.

11.

Fredriksen-Goldsen

K. I.

Kim

H.-J.

Shiu

Goldsen

Emlet

C. A.

(2015). Successful aging among LGBT older adults: Physical and mental health-related quality of life by age group. The Gerontologist, 55(1), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu081

12.

Fredriksen-Goldsen

K. I.

(2011). Resilience and disparities among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and transgender older adults. The Public Policy and Aging Report, 21(3), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppar/21.3.3

13.

Funk

J. L.

Rogge

R. D.

(2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 572–583. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572

14.

House

J. S.

Landis

K. R.

Umberson

(1988). Social relationships and health. Science, 241(4865), 540–545. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3399889

15.

Hughes

Cartwright

(2014). LGBT people’s knowledge of and preparedness to discuss end-of-life care planning options. Health and Social Care in the Community, 22(5), 545–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12113

16.

Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Health Issues and Research Gaps and Opportunities . (2011). The health of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and transgender people: Building a foundation for better understanding. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK64806/

17.

Institute of Medicine . (2015). Dying in America: Improving quality and honoring individual preferences near the end of life. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18748

18.

Kramer

B. J.

Kipnis

(1995). Eldercare and work-role conflict: Toward an understanding of gender differences in caregiver Burden1. The Gerontologist, 35(3), 340–348. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/35.3.340

19.

Lannutti

P. J.

(2005). For better or worse: Exploring the meanings of same-sex marriage within the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered community. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505049319

20.

Lannutti

P. J.

(2011). Security, recognition, and misgivings: Exploring older same-sex couples’ experiences of legally recognized same-sex marriage. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510386136

21.

LeBlanc

A. J.

Frost

D. M.

Wight

R. G.

(2015). Minority stress and stress proliferation among same-sex and other marginalized couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12160

22.

Lewis

M. A.

Rook

K. S.

(1999). Social control in personal relationships: Impact on health behaviors and psychological distress. Health Psychology, 18(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.18.1.63

23.

Meyer

I. H.

(2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674

24.

Moorman

(2020). Dying in old age: U.S. practice and policy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351020183

25.

Muraco

Fredriksen-Goldsen

K. I.

(2015). The highs and lows of caregiving for chronically Ill Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual elders. In Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and transgender aging. Routledge.

26.

Muraco

Fredriksen-Goldsen

(2011). “That’s what friends do”: Informal caregiving for chronically ill midlife and older lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(8), 1073–1092. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407511402419

27.

Perkins

H. S.

Hazuda

H. P.

Cortez

J. D.

(2004). Advance care planning: Does patient gender make a difference? The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 327(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000441-200401000-00006

28.

Pfeifer

M. P.

Mitchell

C. K.

Chamberlain

(2003). The value of disease severity in predicting patient readiness to address end-of-life issues. Archives of Internal Medicine, 163(5), 609–612. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.163.5.609

29.

Reczek

Umberson

(2012). Gender, health behavior, and intimate relationships: Lesbian, gay, and straight contexts. Social Science & Medicine, 74(11), 1783–1790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.011

30.

Reczek

Umberson

(2016). Greedy spouse, needy parent: The marital dynamics of Gay, Lesbian, and heterosexual intergenerational caregivers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(4), 957–974. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12318

31.

Riggle

E. D. B.

Rostosky

S. S.

Couch

Brodnicki

Campbell

Savage

(2006). To have or not to have: Advance planning by same-sex couples. Sexuality Research and Social Policy Journal of NSRC, 3(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1525/srsp.2006.3.1.22

32.

Seelman

K. L.

Lewinson

Engleman

Allen

(2019). Motivations for advance care and end-of-life planning among lesbian, gay, and bisexual older adults. Qualitative Social Work: QSW: Research and Practice, 18(6), 1002–1016. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325018792396

33.

Stein

G. L.

Beckerman

N. L.

Sherman

P. A.

(2010). Lesbian and gay elders and long-term care: Identifying the unique psychosocial perspectives and challenges. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 53(5), 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2010.496478

34.

Sudore

R. L.

Fried

T. R.

(2010). Redefining the “Planning” in advance care planning: Preparing for end-of-life decision making. Annals of Internal Medicine, 153(4), 256–261. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-153-4-201008170-00008

35.

Thomeer

M. B.

Donnelly

Reczek

Umberson

(2017). Planning for future care and the end of life: A qualitative analysis of Gay, Lesbian, and heterosexual couples. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 58(4), 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146517735524

36.

Thomeer

M. B.

Reczek

Umberson

(2015). Gendered emotion work around physical health problems in mid- and later-life marriages. Journal of Aging Studies, 32, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2014.12.001

37.

Umberson

Thomeer

M. B.

Kroeger

R. A.

Lodge

A. C.

(2015). Challenges and opportunities for research on same-sex relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(1), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12155

38.

Williams

D. R.

Jackson

J. S.

Anderson

N. B.

(1997). Racial differences in physical and mental health: Socio-economic status, stress and discrimination. Journal of Health Psychology, 2(3), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910539700200305

End-of-Life Planning in Aging Same-Sex and Different-Sex Married Couples

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References