Relocation, a common life event in later life, may affect the nature of intergenerational contact. This study examined changes in contact frequency with adult children across four contact modes (in-person, telephone, email and social media) following relocation. We leveraged data from the Health and Retirement Study (2014–2018) include 3,015 older adults aged 50 or older who either stayed or relocated in the last 4 years. Using ordinal logistic regression, we found there were differential effects of relocation and proximity on changes in intergenerational contact frequency, depending on contact mode. While in-person and telephone contact modes are sensitive to both relocation and proximity to a child, email and social media contact modes, on the other hand, are not sensitive to relocation and proximity to a child. Our findings suggest that digital communication technologies may help overcome the barrier of physical distance and play a vital role in maintaining intergenerational relationships.
AntonucciT. C.AjrouchK. J.ManalelJ. A. (2017). Social relations and technology: Continuity, context, and change. Innovation in Aging, 1(3), igx029. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igx029
2.
ArpinoB.MeliE.PasqualiniM.TomassiniC.CisottoE. (2022). Determinants of grandparent–grandchild digital contact in Italy. Genus, 78(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-022-00167-5
3.
BengtsonV. L. (2001). Beyond the nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational bonds: The burgess award lecture. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00001.x
4.
BengtsonV. L.RobertE. L. R. (1991). Intergenerational solidarity in aging families: An example of formal theory construction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 53(4), 856–870. https://doi.org/10.2307/352993
5.
ChoJ.KimB.JeonJ.ParkS. (2020). Perceived usefulness and easiness of information and communication technologies and volunteering among older adults. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 63(5), 428–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2020.1760992
6.
ChoJ.SmithJ. (2023). Relocation later in life and contact frequency with friends: Do contact modes matter?Research on Aging, 45(5-6), 486–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/01640275221126103
7.
ChoiH.SchoeniR.XuH.ReyesA.ThomasD. (2021). Proximity to mother over the life course in the United States. Demographic Research, 45(23), 769–806. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2021.45.23
8.
CornwellB.LaumannE. O.SchummL. P. (2008). The social connectedness of older adults: A national profile. American Sociological Review, 73(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240807300201
FingermanK. L.HuoM.BirdittK. S. (2020). A decade of research on intergenerational ties: Technological, economic, political, and demographic changes. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 383–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12604
11.
FingermanK. L.KimK.TennantP. S.BirdittK. S.ZaritS. H. (2016). Intergenerational support in a daily context. The Gerontologist, 56(5), 896–908. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv035
12.
FingermanK. L.NgY. T.ZhangS.BrittK.ColeraG.BirdittK. S.CharlesS. T. (2021). Living alone during COVID-19: Social contact and emotional well-being among older adults. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 76(3), e116–e121. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa200
13.
FreedmanV. A.HuM.KasperJ. D. (2022). Changes in older adults’ social contact during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 77(7), e160–e166. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbab166
14.
HaggeK.SchachtD. (2024). Variations in access to social support: The effects of residential mobility and spatial proximity to kin and family. Social Indicators Research, 172(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03280-w
15.
HankK. (2007). Proximity and contacts between older parents and their children: A European comparison. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(1), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00351.x
16.
Holt-LunstadJ. (2023). National health guidelines for social connection: What is the evidence in support and what might the guidelines say?Policy Insights From the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/23727322221150204
LiS. (Alex)HuW.GuoF. (2022). Recent Relocation Patterns Among Older Adults in the United States: Who, Why, and Where. Journal of the American Planning Association, 88(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2021.1902842
19.
LinG.RogersonP. A. (1995). Elderly parents and the geographic availability of their adult children. Research on Aging, 17(3), 303–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027595173004
20.
LitwakE.LonginoC. F. (1987). Migration patterns among the elderly: A developmental perspective. The Gerontologist, 27(3), 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/27.3.266
21.
MokD.WellmanB. (2007). Did distance matter before the internet? Interpersonal contact and support in the 1970s. Social Networks, 29(3), 430–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2007.01.009
PengS.SilversteinM.SuitorJ. J.GilliganM.HwangW.NamS.RouthB. (2018). Use of communication technology to maintain intergenerational contact: Toward an understanding of ‘digital solidarity. In Connecting families? (pp. 159–180). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447339946.003.0009
24.
Quan-HaaseA.MoG. Y.WellmanB. (2017). Connected seniors: How older adults in East York exchange social support online and offline. Information, Communication & Society, 20(7), 967–983. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2017.1305428
25.
Quan-HaaseA.WangH.WellmanB.ZhangA. (2018). Weaving family connections on and offline: The turn to networked individualism. In NevesB. B.CasimiroC. (Eds.), Connecting families: Information & communication technologies, generations, and the life course (pp. 57–77). Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447339953.005
26.
Quan-HaaseA.ZhangA.WangH.WellmanB. (2019). Older adults on digital media in a networked society. In GrahamM.DuttonW. H. (Eds.), Society and the internet (2nd ed., pp. 96–108). Oxford University Press.
27.
ReyesA. M.PattersonS. E. (2025). Dynamics of family exchanges: How life course transfers influence support from adult children. Research on Aging, 47(7-8), 346–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/01640275251321485
28.
ReyesA. M.ShangY. (2024). Geographic relocation in response to parents’ health shocks: Who moves and how close?Journal of Marriage and Family, 86(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12939
29.
SanderJ.SchuppJ.RichterD. (2017). Getting together: Social contact frequency across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 53(8), 1571–1588. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000349
30.
SilversteinM.BengtsonV. L. (1997). Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult child-parent relationships in American families. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 429–460. https://doi.org/10.1086/231213
31.
SmithJ.RyanL. H.FisherG. G.SonnegaA.WeirD. R. (2017). HRS psychosocial and lifestyle questionnaire 2006–2016 documentation report. University of Michigan, Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research.
32.
SonnegaA.FaulJ. D.OfstedalM. B.LangaK. M.PhillipsJ. W.WeirD. R. (2014). Cohort profile: The health and retirement study (HRS). International Journal of Epidemiology, 43(2), 576–585. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu067
