This study explored the relationships among emotion regulation (ER) strategies, received emotional social support, and relationship quality (RQ) in U.S. older adults (65+). A cross-sectional survey of 323 respondents recruited through ResearchMatch, an online participant registry, measured intrinsically- and extrinsically-directed ER strategy use, received emotional social support, and RQ across six social network members. Results indicated that suppression, a response-focused ER strategy, was negatively associated with RQ, with emotional social support partially mediating this relationship. Suppression reduced emotional social support, which in turn decreased RQ, particularly in close relationships. Analysis of specific antecedent-focused ER strategies revealed that emotional social support mediated the relationship between situation modification and situation selection and RQ. These findings highlight the importance of context-specific ER, the adverse effects of suppression, and the role of received emotional social support as a mediator between ER strategies and RQ, particularly in older adults’ close relationships.
AllenV. C.WindsorT. D. (2019). Age differences in the use of emotion regulation strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation: A systematic review. Aging & Mental Health, 23(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2017.1396575
2.
AntonucciT. C. (1986). Measuring social support networks: Hierarchical mapping technique. Generations: Journal of the American Society on Aging, 10(4), 10–12. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44876253.
3.
BalstersM. J. H.KrahmerE. J.SwertsM. G. J.VingerhoetsA. J. J. M. (2013). Emotional tears facilitate the recognition of sadness and the perceived need for social support. Evolutionary Psychology: An International Journal of Evolutionary Approaches to Psychology and Behavior, 11(1), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491301100114
4.
BarbeeA. P.RowattT. L.CunninghamM. R. (1996). When a friend is in need: Feelings about seeking, giving, and receiving social support. In Handbook of communication and emotion (pp. 281–301). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012057770-5/50012-6
5.
Blanchard-FieldsF. (2009). Flexible and adaptive socio-emotional problem solving in adult development and aging. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 27(5), 539–550. https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-2009-0516
6.
Blanchard-FieldsF.SteinR.WatsonT. L. (2004). Age differences in emotion-regulation strategies in handling everyday problems. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 59(6), P261–P269. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/59.6.p261
7.
BorgonoviF. (2008). Doing well by doing good. The relationship between formal volunteering and self-reported health and happiness. Social Science & Medicine, 66(11), 2321–2334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.011
8.
BurrD. A.CastrellonJ. J.ZaldD. H.Samanez-LarkinG. R. (2021). Emotion dynamics across adulthood in everyday life: Older adults are more emotionally stable and better at regulating desires. Emotion, 21(3), 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000734
9.
ButlerE. A.EgloffB.WilhelmF. H.SmithN. C.EricksonE. A.GrossJ. J. (2003). The social consequences of expressive suppression. Emotion, 3(1), 48–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.3.1.48
10.
CarstensenL. L.TuranB.ScheibeS.RamN.Ersner-HershfieldH.Samanez-LarkinG. R.BrooksK. P.NesselroadeJ. R. (2011). Emotional experience improves with age: Evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling. Psychology and Aging, 26(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021285
11.
ChervonskyE.HuntC. (2017). Suppression and expression of emotion in social and interpersonal outcomes: A meta-analysis. Emotion, 17(4), 669–683. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000270
12.
EnglishT.CarstensenL. L. (2014). Selective narrowing of social networks across adulthood is associated with improved emotional experience in daily life. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38(2), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025413515404
13.
EnglishT.EldesoukyL. (2020). We're not alone: Understanding the social consequences of intrinsic emotion regulation. Emotion, 20(1), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000661
14.
EnglishT.JohnO. P. (2013). Understanding the social effects of emotion regulation: the mediating role of authenticity for individual differences in suppression. Emotion, 13(2), 314. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029847
15.
EnglishT.LeeI. A.JohnO. P.GrossJ. J. (2017). Emotion regulation strategy selection in daily life: The role of social context and goals. Motivation and Emotion, 41(2), 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9597-z
16.
FalconierM. K.Wojda-BurlijA. K.ConwayC. A.KimJ. (2023). The role of emotion regulation in couples’ stress communication and dyadic coping responses. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 39(2), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3186
17.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
18.
FinchamF. D.RoggeR. (2010). Understanding relationship quality: Theoretical challenges and new tools for assessment. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2(4), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00059.x
19.
GrossJ. J. (1998a). Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.74.1.224
20.
GrossJ. J. (1998b). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271
21.
GrossJ. J. (2015). The extended process model of emotion regulation: Elaborations, applications, and future directions. Psychological Inquiry, 26(1), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2015.989751
22.
GrossJ. J.JohnO. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348
23.
GrossJ. J.RichardsJ. M.JohnO. P. (2006). Emotion regulation in everyday life. In SnyderD. A.SimpsonJ. A.HughesJ. N. (Eds.), Emotion regulation in families: Pathways to dysfunction and health (pp. 13–35). American Psychologist Association.
24.
HarmanH. H. (1967). Modern factor analysis (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
27.
IBM Corp. Released. (2022). IBM SPSS statistics for Macintosh, version 29.0. IBM Corp.
28.
ImpettE. A.KoganA.EnglishT.JohnO.OveisC.GordonA. M.KeltnerD. (2012). Suppression sours sacrifice: Emotional and relational costs of suppressing emotions in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(6), 707–720. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212437249
29.
JarmanR. E.WindsorT. D. (2021). “Calm down,” “cheer up”: How age influences the way we manage emotion in social partners. Research on Aging, 43(2), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027520946680
30.
LangF. R.CarstensenL. L. (2002). Time counts: Future time perspective, goals and social relationships. Psychology and Aging, 17(1), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.1.125
31.
LevensonR. W.HaaseC. M.BlochL.HolleyS. R.SeiderB. J. (2014). Emotion regulation in couples. In GrossJ. J. (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (2nd ed., pp. 267–283). Guilford.
32.
LivingstoneK. M.IsaacowitzD. M. (2021). Age and emotion regulation in daily life: Frequency, strategies, tactics, and effectiveness. Emotion, 21(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000672
33.
LopezR. B.CourtneyA. L.LiangD.SwinchoskiA.GoodsonP.DennyB. T. (2024). Social support and adaptive emotion regulation: Links between social network measures, emotion regulation strategy use, and health. Emotion, 24(1), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001242
34.
LuongG.CharlesS. T. (2014). Age differences in affective and cardiovascular responses to a negative social interaction: The role of goals, appraisals, and emotion regulation. Developmental Psychology, 50(7), 1919–1930. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036621
35.
MazzucaS.KafetsiosK.LiviS.PresaghiF. (2019). Emotion regulation and satisfaction in long-term marital relationships: The role of emotional contagion. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(9), 2880–2895. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518804452
36.
Mérida-LópezS.ExtremeraN.Quintana-OrtsC.ReyL. (2019). In pursuit of job satisfaction and happiness: Testing the interactive contribution of emotion-regulation ability and workplace social support. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 60(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12483
37.
MyersM. W.HodgesS. D. (2012). The structure of self–other overlap and its relationship to perspective taking. Personal Relationships, 19(4), 663–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01382.x
38.
National Academies of Sciences, Medicine, Division of Behavioral, Social Sciences, Medicine Division, Board on Behavioral, ... & Loneliness in Older Adults (2020). Social isolation and loneliness in older adults: Opportunities for the health care system. National Academies Press.
39.
NivenK.HolmanD.TotterdellP. (2012). How to win friendship and trust by influencing people’s feelings: An investigation of interpersonal affect regulation and the quality of relationships. Human Relations, 65(6), 777–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712439909
40.
NivenK.López-PérezB. (2025). Interpersonal emotion regulation: Reflecting on progress and charting the path forward. Emotion, 25(2), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001472
41.
PetrovaK.GrossJ. J. (2023). The future of emotion regulation research: Broadening our field of view. Affective Science, 4, 609–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-023-00222-0
42.
PostS. G. (2005). Altruism, happiness, and health: It’s good to be good. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 12(2), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327558ijbm1202_4
43.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
RusuP. P.BodenmannG.KayserK. (2019). Cognitive emotion regulation and positive dyadic outcomes in married couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(1), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517751664
46.
SchirdaB.ValentineT. R.AldaoA.PrakashR. S. (2016). Age-related differences in emotion regulation strategies: Examining the role of contextual factors. Developmental Psychology, 52(9), 1370–1380. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000194
SchunkF.TrommsdorffG.WongN.NakaoG. (2021). Associations between emotion regulation and life satisfaction among university students from Germany, Hong Kong, and Japan: The mediating role of social support. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 745888. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.745888
49.
ShiotaM. N.LevensonR. W. (2009). Effects of aging on experimentally instructed detached reappraisal, positive reappraisal, and emotional behavior suppression. Psychology and Aging, 24(4), 890–900. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017896
50.
SimsT.HoganC.CarstensenL. (2015). Selectivity as an emotion regulation strategy: Lessons from older adults. Current Opinion in Psychology, 3, 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.02.012
51.
SorkinD. H.RookK. S. (2006). Dealing with negative social exchanges in later life: Coping responses, goals, and effectiveness. Psychology and Aging, 21(4), 715–725. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.4.715
52.
UrryH. L.GrossJ. J. (2010). Emotion regulation in older age. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(6), 352–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410388395
53.
VauxA.RiedelS.StewartD. (1987). Modes of social support: The social support behaviors (SS‐B) scale. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15(2), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00919279
54.
WalkerS. A.PinkusR. T.OlderbakS.MacCannC. (2024). People with higher relationship satisfaction use more humor, valuing, and receptive listening to regulate their partners’ emotions. Current Psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 43, 2348–2356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04432-4
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
