Support provision may enhance older adults’ well-being. Yet support for friends, a voluntary and socially engaging behavior, remains relatively understudied. This study examines daily support to close friends and its within-person links to mood, focusing on gender differences. Older adults (n = 180, Mean age = 74.02, 57% female) completed 5–6 days of ecological momentary assessments, reporting on their positive and negative mood every 3 hours and support exchanges daily. Emotional support to friends being most common, followed by advice and practical help. Findings showed men were less likely than women to provide emotional support to friends. Older adults experienced greater positive mood on days they provided practical support. Men experienced lower positive mood on days they provided emotional support, a pattern not observed in women. Findings highlight gender differences in helping close friends, suggesting potential emotional costs for older men in providing emotional support.
Abolfathi MomtazY.IbrahimR.HamidT. A. (2014). The impact of giving support to others on older adults’ perceived health status. Psychogeriatrics, 14(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyg.12036
2.
AntonucciT. C.AjrouchK. J.BirdittK. S. (2014). The convoy model: Explaining social relations from a multidisciplinary perspective. The Gerontologist, 54(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt118
3.
BedrovA.GableS. L. (2023). Thriving together: The benefits of women’s social ties for physical, psychological and relationship health. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 378(1868), Article 20210441. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0441
BolgerN.ZuckermanA.KesslerR. C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 953–961. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.953
7.
BrandtsJ.RottC. (2021). Advice from women and men and selection into competition. Journal of Economic Psychology, 82(1), Article 102333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2020.102333
8.
BrodyL. R.HallJ. A. (2010). Gender, emotion, and socialization. In ChrislerJ. C.McCrearyD. R. (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology: Volume 1: Gender research in general and experimental psychology (pp. 429–454). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1465-1_21
9.
BrownS. L.NesseR. M.VinokurA. D.SmithD. M. (2003). Providing social support may be more beneficial than receiving it: Results from a prospective study of mortality. Psychological Science, 14(4), 320–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.14461
10.
BurrJ. A.HanS.LeeH. J.TavaresJ. L.MutchlerJ. E. (2018). Health benefits associated with three helping behaviors: Evidence for incident cardiovascular disease. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 73(3), 492–500. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx082
11.
CallahanC. M.UnverzagtF. W.HuiS. L.PerkinsA. J.HendrieH. C. (2002). Six-item screener to identify cognitive impairment among potential subjects for clinical research. Medical Care, 40(9), 771–781. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200209000-00007
12.
ChesleyN.PoppieK. (2009). Assisting parents and in-laws: Gender, type of assistance, and couples’ employment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(2), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00597.x
13.
ChiK.AlmeidaD. M.CharlesS. T.SinN. L. (2021). Daily prosocial activities and well-being: Age moderation in two national studies. Psychology and Aging, 36(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000460
14.
CompernolleE. L.FinchL. E.HawkleyL. C.CagneyK. A. (2021). Momentary loneliness among older adults: Contextual differences and their moderation by gender and race/ethnicity. Social Science & Medicine, 285(1), Article 114307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114307
DykstraP. A.GierveldJ. de J. (2004). Gender and marital-history differences in emotional and social loneliness among Dutch older adults. Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue Canadienne Du Vieillissement, 23(2), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1353/cja.2004.0018
17.
EaglyA. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64(8), 644–658. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.64.8.644
18.
EaglyA. H.WoodW. (2012). Social role theory. In LangeP. A. M. V.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology. Sage.
19.
EinolfC. J. (2011). Gender differences in the correlates of volunteering and charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(6), 1092–1112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764010385949
20.
EndendijkJ. J.PortengenC. M. (2025). Gender and gender roles in family relationships. In Research handbook on couple and family relationships (pp. 121–135). Edward Elgar Publishing.
21.
FingermanK. L.KimK.TennantP. S.BirdittK. S.ZaritS. H. (2016). Intergenerational support in a daily context. The Gerontologist, 56(5), 896–908. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv035
22.
FischerC. S.BeresfordL. (2015). Changes in support networks in late middle age: The extension of gender and educational differences. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 70(1), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbu057
23.
GaoS.BirdittK. S.FingermanK. L. (2025). When helping helps: benefits of daily advice provision on mood among older adults with life problems. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 80(8), gbaf130. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaf130
24.
GleasonM. E. J.IidaM. (2015). Social support. APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Volume 3: Interpersonal relations (pp. 351–370). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14344-013
GoldmanA. W.CompernolleE. L. (2023). Personal network size and social accompaniment: Protective or risk factor for momentary loneliness, and for whom?Society and Mental Health, 13(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/21568693221142336
HuoM.FuentecillaJ. L.BirdittK. S.FingermanK. L. (2019). Older adults’ empathy and daily support exchanges. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(11–12), 3814–3834. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519837372
30.
HuoM.GrahamJ. L.KimK.BirdittK. S.FingermanK. L. (2019). Aging parents’ daily support exchanges with adult children suffering problems. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 74(3), 449–459. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx079
31.
InagakiT. K.Bryne HaltomK. E.SuzukiS.JevticI.HornsteinE.BowerJ. E.EisenbergerN. I. (2016). The neurobiology of giving versus receiving support: The role of stress-related and social reward–related neural activity. Biopsychosocial Science and Medicine, 78(4), 443–453. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000302
32.
KahnJ. R.McGillB. S.BianchiS. M. (2011). Help to family and friends: Are there gender differences at older ages?Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00790.x
33.
KullgrenJ.SolwayE.RobertsS.PattersonS. E.SingerD.KirchM.BoxN.StrunkS.SmithE. (2024). National Poll on Healthy Aging: The value of friendships as we age. University of Michigan. https://doi.org/10.7302/24852
34.
LachmanM. E.WeaverS. L. (1997). The Midlife Development Inventory personality scales: Scale construction and scoring (7, pp. 1–9): Brandeis University.
35.
LemonB. W.BengtsonV. L.PetersonJ. A. (1972). An exploration of the activity theory of aging: Activity types and life satisfaction among in-movers to a retirement community. Journal of Gerontology, 27(4), 511–523. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/27.4.511
36.
LiT.FokH. K.FungH. H. (2011). Is reciprocity always beneficial? Age differences in the association between support balance and life satisfaction. Aging & Mental Health, 15(5), 541–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2010.551340
37.
MeschD. J.BrownM. S.MooreZ. I.HayatA. D. (2011). Gender differences in charitable giving. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 16(4), 342–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.432
38.
MesseriP.SilversteinM.LitwakE. (1993). Choosing optimal support groups: A review and reformulation. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 34(2), 122–137. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137239
39.
NgY. M. M. (2023). Twitter intermittent and permanent discontinuance: A multi-method approach to study innovation diffusion. Computers in Human Behavior, 138 (2023). 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107482
40.
NgY. M. M. (2025). A cross-national study of fear appeal messages in YouTube trending videos about COVID-19. American Behavioral Scientist, 69(9), 1092–1112. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642231155363
41.
NgY. T.FingermanK. L.BirdittK.S. (2023). Friendships and emotional well-being in the context of race and age. The Gerontologist, 63(7), 1129–1139.
42.
NgY. M. M.Hoffmann PhamK.Luengo-OrozM. (2023). Exploring YouTube’s recommendation system in the context of COVID-19 vaccines: Computational and comparative analysis of video trajectories. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25(2023), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2196/49061
43.
NgY. T.HuoM.GleasonM. E.NeffL. A.CharlesS. T.FingermanK. L. (2021). Friendships in old age: Daily encounters and emotional well-being. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 76(3), 551–562. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa007
44.
NgY. T.HuoM.HanS. H.BirdittK. S.FingermanK. L. (2022). Older adult’s marital status, conversation and well-being in everyday life. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 77(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbab112
45.
NgY. T.KratzA. L.TurkelsonA.BirdittK.S. (2025). Daily interactions with care recipients and cardiovascular reactivity among dementia caregivers: The buffering role of friend interactions. Alzheimer’s & Dementia. The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association, 21(5), e70281. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70281
46.
NgY. T.TurkelsonA.KratzA.BirdittK.S. (in press). Friendship and loneliness in dementia caregiving: Daily experiences of high and low burden caregivers. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences.
47.
NoconA.PearsonM. (2000). The roles of friends and neighbours in providing support for older people. Ageing and Society, 20(3), 341–367. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X99007771
ParkC. L.KubzanskyL. D.ChafouleasS. M.DavidsonR. J.KeltnerD.ParsafarP.ConwellY.MartinM. Y.HanmerJ.WangK. H. (2022). Emotional well-being: What it is and why it matters. Affective Science, 4(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-022-00163-0
50.
PinquartM.SörensenS. (2006). Gender differences in caregiver stressors, social resources, and health: An updated meta-analysis. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 61(1), P33–P45. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/61.1.P33
SanderJ.SchuppJ.RichterD. (2017). Getting together: Social contact frequency across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 53(8), 1571–1588. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000349
53.
ShinH.ParkC. (2022). Social support and psychological well-being in younger and older adults: The mediating effects of basic psychological need satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(1), Article 1051968. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1051968
54.
ShroutP. E.HermanC. M.BolgerN. (2006). The costs and benefits of practical and emotional support on adjustment: A daily diary study of couples experiencing acute stress. Personal Relationships, 13(1), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00108.x
55.
ThomasP. A. (2010). Is it better to give or to receive? Social support and the well-being of older adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series Bsocial sciences, 65B(3), 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbp113
56.
WellmanB.WortleyS. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 558–588. https://doi.org/10.1086/229572
57.
ZanjariN.MomtazY. A.KamalS. H. M.BasakhaM.AhmadiS. (2022). The influence of providing and receiving social support on older adults’ well-being. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health: CP & EMH, 18(1), Article e174501792112241. https://doi.org/10.2174/17450179-v18-e2112241
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
