This study examined differences in middle-aged adults’ preferred features of their current versus future residential environments and how these differences varied by health and social characteristics. A sample of 1,651 Korean middle-aged adults (aged 49–64) rated their preferences for each of 12 features (e.g., proximity to family/relatives, house price) regarding current and future residential environments, separately. Respondents considered “accessibility to health services” and “opportunity for leisure activities” more important for future residential environments than for current ones. Respondents with poorer health considered features that help them compensate for health decline more important, while those who contacted friends/neighbors more frequently and participated in more cultural activities considered features that help them maintain their social interactions more important for future residential environments than the past. Our findings identified middle-aged adults’ various demands for residential features after retirement, which reflect their strategic reactions to future needs for successful adaptation in later years.
AbramssonM.AnderssonE. (2016). Changing preferences with ageing: Housing choices and housing plans of older people. Housing, Theory and Society, 33(2), 217–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2015.1104385
2.
AlmquistY. B.LandstedtE.HammarströmA. (2017). Associations between social support and depressive symptoms: Social causation or social selection—or both?European Journal of Public Health, 27(1), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckw120
3.
AnderssonE.AbramssonM.MalmbergB. (2019). Patterns of changing residential preferences during late adulthood. Ageing & Society, 39(8), 1752–1781. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X18000259
BaltesP. B.BaltesM. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In BaltesP. B.BaltesM. M. (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665684.003
CarpentieriJ. D.ElliottJ.BrettC. E.DearyI. J. (2017). Adapting to aging: Older people talk about their use of selection, optimization, and compensation to maximize well-being in the context of physical decline. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 72(2), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw132
8.
CarstensenL. L.IsaacowitzD. M.CharlesS. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165
9.
ChaoS. F. (2011). Assessing social support and depressive symptoms in older Chinese adults: A longitudinal perspective. Aging & Mental Health, 15(6), 765–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2011.562182
CoulterR.ScottJ. (2015). What motivates residential mobility? Re-examining self-reported reasons for desiring and making residential moves. Population, Space and Place, 21(4), 354–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1863
12.
CoultonC.TheodosB.TurnerM. A. (2012). Residential mobility and neighborhood change: Real neighborhoods under the microscope. Cityscape, 14(3), 55–89.
13.
DiehrP. H.ThielkeS. M.NewmanA. B.HirschC.TracyR. (2013). Decline in health for older adults: Five-year change in 13 key measures of standardized health. The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 68(9), 1059–1067. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glt038
ElmerT.StadtfeldC. (2020). Depressive symptoms are associated with social isolation in face-to-face interaction networks. Scientific Reports, 10, 1444. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58297-9
16.
EvensonK. R.RosamondW. D.CaiJ.Diez-RouxA. V.BrancatiF. L.Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities Study Investigators. (2002). Influence of retirement on leisure-time physical activity: The atherosclerosis risk in communities study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 155(8), 692–699. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/155.8.692
17.
FancourtD.AughtersonH.FinnS.WalkerE.SteptoeA. (2021). How leisure activities affect health: A narrative review and multi-level theoretical framework of mechanisms of action. The Lancet Psychiatry, 8(4), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30384-9
18.
FriedlineT.MasaR. D.ChowaG. A. N. (2015). Transforming wealth: Using the inverse hyperbolic sine (IHS) and splines to predict youth’s math achievement. Social Science Research, 49, 264–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.08.018
19.
GallantM. P.SpitzeG. D.ProhaskaT. R. (2007). Help or hindrance? How family and friends influence chronic illness self-management among older adults. Research on Aging, 29(5), 375–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027507303169
20.
GiblerK. M.LeeE. (2005). The impact of economic, demographic, and cultural changes on preferences for independent living arrangements and seniors housing in South Korea. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 19(2), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1300/J081v19n02_06
21.
HaasW. H.III.SerowW. J. (1997). Retirement migration decision making: Life course mobility, sequencing of events, social ties and alternatives. Journal of the Community Development Society, 28(1), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575339709489798
22.
HanG.ChoeH.EunK.-S.LeeJ.JooS.-H.KimJ. (2011). Korean baby boomers in transition. Seoul National University, Institute on Aging.
23.
HashimotoK.KuritaH.HarataniT.FujiiK.IshibashiT. (1999). Direct and buffering effects of social support on depressive symptoms of the elderly with home help. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 53(1), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1819.1999.00478.x
24.
Hillcoat-NallétambyS.OggJ. (2014). Moving beyond ‘ageing in place’: Older people’s dislikes about their home and neighbourhood environments as a motive for wishing to move. Ageing & Society, 34(10), 1771–1796. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X13000482
25.
JungS. Y.LeeJ. H.YouH.KimY. R.JungY. (2023). Research on community-based integrated support for the Aging in Place in the super-aged era (Publication No. 23-08). Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements. [in Korean].
26.
KahanaE.KahanaB.LeeJ. E. (2014). Proactive approaches to successful aging: One clear path through the forest. Gerontology, 60(5), 466–474. https://doi.org/10.1159/000360222
27.
KimH.-Y.LeeY.-S.YoonH.-G. (2010). The study on housing characteristics preferred by baby boomers after retirement: Focusing on apartment’s residents of Gangnam region in Seoul. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 21(5), 83–92. [in Korean]. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2010.21.5.083
KuluH.MilewskiN. (2007). Family change and migration in the life course: An introduction. Demographic Research, 17(19), 567–590. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2007.17.19
30.
LachmanM. E.TeshaleS.AgrigoroaeiS. (2015). Midlife as a pivotal period in the life course: Balancing growth and decline at the crossroads of youth and old age. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 39(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025414533223
31.
LangF. R.CarstensenL. L. (2002). Time counts: Future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and Aging, 17(1), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.17.1.125
LewickaM. (2010). What makes neighborhood different from home and city? Effects of place scale on place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.004
34.
LiJ.AuchinclossA. H.RodriguezD. A.MooreK. A.Diez RouxA. V.SánchezB. N. (2020). Determinants of residential preferences related to built and social environments and concordance between neighborhood characteristics and preferences. Journal of Urban Health, 97(1), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-019-00397-7
35.
Lim-SohJ.AngS.MalhotraR. (2023). Trajectories of informal and formal social participation after retirement. Work, Aging and Retirement. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waad022
ParkJ. G.NohY. H. (2012). A study on the direction for housing policy with baby boomers' dwelling preferences. Journal of Korea Real Estate Society, 35, 187–214. [in Korean].
39.
PerryT. E.ThielsJ. F. (2016). Moving as a family affair: Applying the SOC model to older adults and their kinship networks. Journal of Family Social Work, 19(2), 74–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.2016.1157845
40.
PressmanS. D.MatthewsK. A.CohenS.MartireL. M.ScheierM.BaumA.SchulzR. (2009). Association of enjoyable leisure activities with psychological and physical well-being. Psychosomatic Medicine, 71(7), 725–732. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181ad7978
41.
RammstedtB.JohnO. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the big five inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
42.
SchiambergL. B.McKinneyK. G. (2003). Factors influencing expectations to move or age in place at retirement among 40- to 65-year-olds. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 22(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464802250043
43.
SörensenS.PinquartM. (2000). Vulnerability and access to resources as predictors of preparation for future care needs in the elderly. Journal of Aging and Health, 12(3), 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/089826430001200301
44.
Van DijkH. M.CrammJ. M.Van ExelJ.NieboerA. P. (2015). The ideal neighbourhood for ageing in place as perceived by frail and non-frail community-dwelling older people. Ageing & Society, 35(8), 1771–1795. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x14000622
45.
WangM.ShultzK. S. (2010). Employee retirement: A review and recommendations for future investigation. Journal of Management, 36(1), 172–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309347957
46.
YunJ.ByunE.BangJ. (2024). Baby boomers’ perception of aging in place (AIP) and housing demands based on seven metropolitan cities (Auri Research Brief No. 88).Architecture & Urban Research Institute.
47.
ZhangW.RadhakrishnanK. (2018). Evidence on selection, optimization, and compensation strategies to optimize aging with multiple chronic conditions: A literature review. Geriatric Nursing, 39(5), 534–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2018.02.013
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
