Helping Behavior of Older Adults during the Early COVID-19 Lockdown in Belgium

Abstract

This study aimed to understand whether older adults not only received but also provided help during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Belgium, which factors motivated them to help, and whether older adults differed from younger age groups in terms of helping behavior and motives. Bivariate analyses were performed using data generated from an online cross-sectional survey in Belgium (N = 1892).

The results showed that older adults who received help also provided it. This “interdependence” – mutual or reciprocal dependence – occurred regardless of age. In terms of motives for providing help, both older adults and their younger peers were primarily motivated by present-oriented and emotion-related motivation: older people were motivated to provide help by altruistic values and humanism, and enhancement motives linked to self-development.

Policy implications of these results entail: during crisis situations, make use of the bond between older adults and their neighbors, such as caring communities.

Keywords

helping behavior older adults motives social-emotional selectivity theory COVID-19

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ayalon

Chasteen

Diehl

Levy

B. R.

Neupert

S. D.

Rothermund

Tesch-Römer

Wahl

H.-W.

(2021). Aging in times of the COVID-19 pandemic: Avoiding ageism and fostering intergenerational solidarity. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(2), e49–e52. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa051

Barth

Guyot

Fraser

S. A.

Lagacé

Adam

Gouttefarde

Goethals

Bechard

Bongue

Fundenberger

Célarier

(2021). COVID-19 and quarantine, a catalyst for ageism. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 589244. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.589244

Basaure

Joignant

Mascareno

(2021). Between distancing and interdependence: The conflict of solidarities in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sociological Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1177/07311214211005492

Baumeister

R. F.

(2005). The cultural animal: Human nature, meaning, and social life. Oxford University Press.

Bowe

Wakefiels

J. R. H.

Kellezi

Stevenson

McNamara

Jones

B. A.

Sumich

Heym

(2021). The mental health benefits of community helping during crisis: Coordinated helping, community identification and sense of unity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2520

Buffel

Verté

De Donder

De Witte

Dury

Vanwing

Bolsenbroek

(2012). Theorising the relationship between older people and their immediate social living environment. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 31(1), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2012.636577

Buffel

Yarker

Phillipson

Lang

Lewis

Doran

Goff

(2021). Locked down by inequality: Older adults and the COVID-19 pandemic. Urban Studies. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211041018

Burr

J. A.

Han

Lee

H. J.

Tavares

J. L.

Mutchler

J. E.

(2018). Health benefits associated with three helping behaviors: Evidence for incident cardiovascular disease. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 73(3), 492–500. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx082

Caprara

G. V.

Alessandri

Eisenberg

(2012). Prosociality: The contribution of traits, values, and self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1289–1303. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025626

10.

Carr

D. C.

King

Matz-Costa

(2015). Parent–teacher association, soup kitchen, church, or the local civic club? Life stage indicators of volunteer domain. The International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 80(4), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415015603608

11.

Carstensen

L. L.

(1992). Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 7(3), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.7.3.331

12.

Carstensen

L. L.

(1993). Motivation for social contact across the life span: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. In Jacobs

(Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 209–254). University of Nebraska Press.

13.

Carstensen

L. L.

Hershfield

H. E.

(2021). Beyond stereotypes: Using socioemotional selectivity theory to improve messaging to older adults. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(4), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211011468

14.

Clary

E. G.

Snyder

Ridge

R. D.

Copeland

Stukas

A. A.

Haugen

Miene

(1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1516–1530. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.74.6.1516

15.

Clary

E. G.

Snyder

Stukas

A. A.

(1996). Volunteers’ motivations: Findings from a national survey. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25(4), 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764096254006

16.

Dávila

M. C.

Díaz-Morales

J. F.

(2009). Age and motives for volunteering: Further evidence. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 5(2), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v5i2.268

17.

De Donder

Smetcoren

A. S.

Schols

van der Vorst

Dierckx

D-SCOPE consortium . (2019). Critical reflections on the blind sides of frailty in later life. Journal of Aging Studies, 49, 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2019.100787

18.

De Haas

Faber

Hamersma

(2020). How COVID-19 and the dutch ‘intelligent lockdown’ change activities, work and travel behaviour: Evidence from longitudinal data in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 6, 100150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100150

19.

Drury

Tekin Guven

(2020). Emergencies and disasters. In Jetten

Reicher

S. D.

Haslam

S. A.

Cruwys

(Eds.), Together apart: The psychology of COVID-19 (pp. 80–83). Sage.

20.

Dunn

Chambers

S. K.

Hyde

M. K.

(2016). Systematic review of motives for episodic volunteering. Voluntas, 27(1), 425–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9548-4

21.

Dury

Brosens

Smetcoren

A.-S.

Van Regenmortel

De Witte

De Donder

Verté

(2020). Pathways to late-life volunteering: A focus on social connectedness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(3), 523–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764019881509

22.

Dury

Stas

Switsers

Duppen

Abella

Dierckx

De Donder

D-SCOPE consortium . (2021). Gender-related differences in the relationship between social and activity participation and health and subjective well-being in later life. Social Science & Medicine, 270, 113668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113668

23.

Field

(2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. (5th ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.

24.

Fraser

Lagacé

Bongué

Ndeye

Guyot

Bechard

Garcia

Taler

CCNA Social Inclusion and Stigma Working Group Adam

Beaulieu

Bergeron

C. D.

Boudjemadi

Desmette

Donizzetti

A. R.

Éthier

Garon

Gillis

Tougas

(2020). Ageism and COVID-19: What does our society’s response say about us? Age and Ageing, 49(5), 692–695. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa097

25.

Gilligan

Suitor

J. J.

Rurka

Silverstein

(2020). Multigenerational support in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 12(4), 431–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12397

26.

Glazer

E. S.

(2020). Grandparenting in the time of COVID-19 [Web log post]. https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/grandparenting-inthe-time-of-covid-19-2020032119261 (Accessed June 20th, 2021).

27.

Gong

Seaman

K. L.

Fung

H. H.

Loeckenhoff

Lang

F. R.

(2019). Development and validation of social motivation questionnaire. The Gerontologist, 59(6), e664–e673. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny121

28.

Halpern

(2020). Introducing the “grandparents academy”. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/26/opinion/covid-home-school-grandparents.html (Accessed March 18, 2022).

29.

Jacobson

N. C.

Lekkas

Price

Heinz

M. V.

Song

O’Malley

A. J.

Barr

P. J.

(2020). Flattening the mental health curve: COVID-19 stay-at-home orders are associated with alterations in mental health search behavior in the United States. JMIR Mental Health, 7(6), Article e19347. https://doi.org/10.2196/19347

30.

Johnson

K. J.

Mutchler

J. E.

(2014). The emergence of a positive gerontology: From disengagement to social involvement. The Gerontologist, 54(1), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt099

31.

Lawton

R. N.

Gramatki

Watt

Fujiwara

(2020). Does volunteering make us happier, or are happier adults more likely to volunteer? Addressing the problem of reverse causality when estimating the well-being impacts of volunteering. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00242-8

32.

Levine

Prosser

Evans

Reicher

(2005). Identity and emergency intervention: How social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(4), 443–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271651

33.

Y.-P.

Lin

S.-I.

Chen

C.-H.

(2011). Gender differences in the relationship of social activity and quality of life in community-dwelling Taiwanese elders. Journal of Women & Aging, 23(4), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952841.2011.611052

34.

Madsen

Ambrens

Ohl

(2019). Enhancing resilience in community-dwelling older adults: A rapid review of the evidence and implications for public health practitioners. Frontiers in Public Health, 7, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00014

35.

Mak

H. W.

Fancourt

(2021). Predictors of engaging in voluntary work during the COVID-19 pandemic: Analyses of data from 31,890 adults in the UK. Perspectives in Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757913921994146

36.

Marston

H. R.

Shore

White

P. J.

(2020). How does a (smart) age-friendly ecosystem look in a post-pandemic society? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 8276. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218276

37.

Moore

K. A.

Lucas

J. J.

(2021). Covid-19 distress and worries: The role of attitudes, social support, and positive coping during social isolation, psychology and psychotherapy. Theory, Research and Practice, 94(2), 365–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12308

38.

Morrow-Howell

Galucia

Swinford

(2020). Recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic: A focus on older adults. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 32(4–5), 526–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2020.1759758

39.

Morrow-Howell

Gonzales

(2020). Recovering from Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Resisting ageism and recommitting to a productive aging perspective. Public Policy & Aging Report, 30(4), 133–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppar/praa021

40.

Pan

Fokkema

Switsers

Dury

Hoens

De Donder

(2021). Older Chinese migrants in coronavirus pandemic: exploring risk and protective factors to increased loneliness. European Journal of Ageing, 18, 207–215.

41.

Peng

Silverstein

Suitor

J. J.

Gilligan

Hwang

Nam

Routh

(2018). Use of communication technology to maintain intergenerational contact: Toward an understanding of ‘digital solidarity’. In Neves

B. B.

Casimiro

(Eds.), Connecting families? Information and communication technologies, generations, and the life course (pp. 159–180). Policy Press.

42.

Pentaris

Willis

Ray

Deusdad

Lonbay

Niemi

Donnelly

(2020). Older adults in the context of COVID-19: A European perspective. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 63(8), 736–742. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2020.1821143

43.

Portes

Sensenbrenner

(1993). Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. The American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1320–1350. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2781823

44.

Previtali

Allen

L. D.

Varlamova

(2020). Not only virus spread: The diffusion of ageism during the outbreak of COVID-19. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 32(4–5), 506–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2020.1772002

45.

Principi

Chiatti

Lamura

(2012). Motivations of older volunteers in three European countries. International Journal of Manpower, 33(6), 704–722. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437721211261831

46.

Principi

Jensen

Lamura

(Eds.). (2014). Active ageing: Voluntary work by older people in Europe. Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1ggjk6v

47.

Putnam

Morrow-Howell

Inoue

Greenfield

J. C.

Chen

Lee

(2014). Suitability of public use secondary data sets to study multiple activities. The Gerontologist, 54(5), 818–829. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt074

48.

Schnell

Hoof

(2012). Meaningful commitment: Finding meaning in volunteer work. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 33(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2012.650029

49.

Seddighi

Salmani

Ermolaeva

Basheva

Sedeh

M.S.

(2020). The challenges and opportunities of online volunteering for COVID-19 response in Iran: A qualitative study. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-48770/v1

50.

Seedsman

(2017). Building a humane society for older people: Compassionate policy making for integration, participation, and positive ageing within a framework of intergenerational solidarity. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 15(3), 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2017.1329582

51.

Sin

N. L.

Klaiber

Wen

J. H.

DeLongis

(2021). Helping amid the pandemic: Daily affective and social implications of COVID-19-related prosocial activities. The Gerontologist, 61(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa140

52.

Smetcoren

A.-S.

De Donder

Duppen

De Witte

Vanmechelen

Verté

(2018). Towards an active caring community in Brussels. In Buffel

Handles

Phillipson

(Eds.), Age-friendly communities: A global perspective (pp. 97–118). Policy Press.

53.

Statbel . (2020). Availability of internet in the household. https://statbel.fgov.be/nl/themas/huishoudens/ict-gebruik-huishoudens#figures (Accessed June 22nd, 2022).

54.

Sun

P. C.

Morrow-Howell

Pawloski

Helbach

(2021). Older adults’ attitudes toward virtual volunteering during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Applied Gerontology. https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648211006978

55.

Thoits

P. A.

(2012). Role-identity salience, purpose and meaning in life, and well-being among volunteers. Social Psychology Quarterly, 75(4), 360–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272512459662

56.

Trautwein

Liberatore

Lindenmeier

von Schnurbein

(2020). Satisfaction with informal volunteering during the COVID-19 crisis: An empirical study considering a Swiss online volunteering platform. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(6), 1142–1151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764020964595

57.

Tsang

Royse

C. F.

Terkawi

A. S.

(2017). Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, 11(1), S80–S89. https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17

58.

UNECE . (2020). Older Persons in Emergency Situations. https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/pau/age/Policy_briefs/ECE_WG1_36_PB25.pdf (Accessed September 9, 2022).

59.

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe . (2019). 2018 active ageing index. https://unece.org/DAM/pau/age/Active_Ageing_Index/ECE-WG-33.pdf (Accessed June 22, 2022).

60.

Urick

(2020). Generational differences and COVID-19: Positive interactions in virtual workplaces, Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 18(4), 379-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2020.1818662

61.

Van Ballegooijen

Goossens

Bruin

R. H.

Michels

Krol

(2021). Concerns, quality of life, access to care and productivity of the general population during the first 8 weeks of the coronavirus lockdown in Belgium and the Netherlands. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1), 227. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06240-7

62.

Vieira

Pierzchajlo

Jangard

Marsh

Olsson

(2020). Perceived threat and acute anxiety predict increased everyday altruism during the COVID-19 pandemic. PsyArxiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/n3t5c

63.

Wilson

(2012). Volunteerism research: A review essay. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(2), 176–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764011434558

64.

Yamashita

Keene

J. R.

Carr

D. C.

(2019). Underlying motivations of volunteering across life stages: A study of volunteers in nonprofit organizations in Nevada. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 38(2), 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464817701202