It has not been well understood how conscientiousness and neuroticism are associated with two related but distinct dimensions of perceived control (i.e., perceived mastery and constraints) among aging adults. The present study examined these associations and their change over time, while addressing whether they differ by age or gender. For respondents aged 50+ at baseline (N = 2,768) in the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) study, multilevel modeling analyses were conducted to assess how conscientiousness and neuroticism predicted perceived mastery and constraints over 2 decades. As expected, higher conscientiousness and lower neuroticism (for both between- and within-person variability) predicted higher perceived mastery and lower perceived constraints overall. Nuanced findings emerged related to age, gender and change over time for different associations of conscientiousness and neuroticism with the outcomes. These findings can inform future research suggesting directions of further investigations for these complex associations.
ArmstrongL.RimesK. A. (2016). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for neuroticism (stress vulnerability): A pilot randomized study. Behavior Therapy, 47(3), 287–298.
2.
BaltesP. B.ReeseH. W.LipsittL. P. (1980). Life-span developmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 31(1), 65–110.
3.
BaltesP. B.SmithJ. (2004). Lifespan psychology: From developmental contextualism to developmental biocultural co-constructivism. Research in Human Development, 1(3), 123–144.
4.
BatesJ. E.SchermerhornA. C.GoodnightJ. A. (2010). Temperament and personality through the life span. In LernerR. M.LambM. E.FreundA. M. (Eds.), The handbook of life-span development (Vol. 2) (pp. 208–253). John Wiley & Sons.
5.
BlackA. C.HarelO.Betsy McCoachD. (2011). Missing data techniques for multilevel data: Implications of model misspecification. Journal of Applied Statistics, 38(9), 1845–1865.
6.
BrimO. G.BaltesP. B.BumpassL. L.ClearyP. D.FeathermanD. L.HazzardW. R.KesslerR. C.LachmanM. E.MarkusH. R.MarmotM. G.RossiA. S.RyffC. D.ShwederR. A. (2019). Midlife in the United States (MIDUS 1), 1995-1996. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02760.v18
7.
CalasantiT. (2010). Gender relations and applied research on aging. The Gerontologist, 50(6), 720–734.
8.
CarverC. S.Connor-SmithJ. (2010). Personality and coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 679–704.
9.
Connor-SmithJ. K.FlachsbartC. (2007). Relations between personality and coping: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(6), 1080–1107.
10.
DreweliesJ.AgrigoroaeiS.LachmanM. E.GerstorfD. (2018). Age variations in cohort differences in the United States: Older adults report fewer constraints nowadays than those 18 years ago, but mastery beliefs are diminished among younger adults. Developmental Psychology, 54(8), 1408–1425.
11.
DreweliesJ.WagnerJ.Tesch-RömerC.HeckhausenJ.GerstorfD. (2017). Perceived control across the second half of life: The role of physical health and social integration. Psychology and Aging, 32(1), 76–92.
12.
EbnerN. C.FreundA. M.BaltesP. B. (2006). Developmental changes in personal goal orientation from young to late adulthood: From striving for gains to maintenance and prevention of losses. Psychology and Aging, 21(4), 664–678.
13.
FolkmanS. (2010). Stress, coping, and hope. Psycho-Oncology, 19, 901–908.
14.
GerstorfD.RockeC.LachmanM. E. (2011). Antecedent-consequent relations of perceived control to health and social support: Longitudinal evidence for between-domain associations across adulthood. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66(1), 61–71.
15.
GoldbergL. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.
16.
GrahamE. K.WestonS. J.TurianoN. A.AschwandenD.BoothT.HarrisonF.JamesB. D.LewisN. A.MakkarS. R.MuellerS.WisniewskiK. M.YonedaT.ZhaoyangR.SpiroA.DreweliesJ.WagnerG. G.Steinhagen-ThiessenE.DemuthI.WillisS.…MroczekD. K. (2020). Is healthy neuroticism associated with health behaviors? A coordinated integrative data analysis. Collabra: Psychology, 6(1), 32.
17.
HoffmanL. (2015). Longitudinal analysis: Modeling within-person fluctuation and change. Routledge.
18.
HowertonA.Van GundyK. (2009). Sex differences in coping styles and implications for depressed mood. International Journal of Stress Management, 16(4), 333–350.
19.
InfurnaF. J.KappesC.FraireN. (2018). Long-term antecedents of constraints and mastery: Findings from the health and retirement study. Psychology and Aging, 33(6), 965–974.
20.
InfurnaF. J.MayerA. (2015). The effects of constraints and mastery on mental and physical health: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Psychology and Aging, 30(2), 432–448.
21.
InfurnaF. J.OkunM. A. (2015). Antecedents and outcomes of level and rates of change in perceived control: The moderating role of age. Developmental Psychology, 51(10), 1420–1437.
22.
JavarasK. N.WilliamsM.Baskin-SommersA. R. (2019). Psychological interventions potentially useful for increasing conscientiousness. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 10(1), 13–24.
23.
JohnsonS. J.BateyM.HoldsworthL. (2009). Personality and health: The mediating role of trait emotional intelligence and work locus of control. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(5), 470–475.
24.
KaiselerM.PolmanR. C. J.NichollsA. R. (2012). Effects of the Big Five personality dimensions on appraisal coping, and coping effectiveness in sport. European Journal of Sport Science, 12(1), 62–72.
25.
KandlerC.KornadtA. E.HagemeyerB.NeyerF. J. (2015). Patterns and sources of personality development in old age. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(1), 175–191.
26.
LachmanM. E.FirthK. M. P. (2004). The adaptive value of feeling in control during midlife. In BrimO. G.RyffC. D.KesslerR. C. (Eds.), The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur foundation series on mental health and development. Studies on successful midlife development. How healthy are we?: A national study of well-being at midlife (p. 320–349). The University of Chicago Press.
27.
LachmanM. E.NeupertS. D.AgrigoroaeiS. (2011). The relevance of control beliefs for health and aging. In SchaieK. W.WillisS. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 175–190). Academic Press.
28.
LachmanM. E.RosnickC.RöckeC. (2009). The rise and fall of control beliefs in adulthood: Cognitive and biopsychosocial antecedents and consequences of stability and change over nine years. In BosworthH.HertzogC. (Eds.), Aging and cognition: Research methodologies and empirical advances (pp. 143–160). American Psychological Association.
29.
LachmanM. E.WeaverS. L. (1998). The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 763–773.
30.
MatudM. P. (2004). Gender differences in stress and coping styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(7), 1401–1415.
31.
McEachanR. R.SuttonS.MyersL. (2010). Mediation of personality influences on physical activity within the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Health Psychology, 15(8), 1170–1180.
32.
MeléndezJ. C.MayordomoT.SanchoP.TomásJ. M. (2012). Coping strategies: Gender differences and development throughout life span. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(03), 1089–1098.
33.
MirowskyJ.RossC. E. (2007). Life course trajectories of perceived control and their relationship to education. American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1339–1382.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
36.
O’RandA. M. (1996). The precious and the precocious: Understanding cumulative disadvantage and cumulative advantage over the life course. The Gerontologist, 36(2), 230–238.
37.
PearlinL. I., & Schooler, C. (1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19, 2–21.
38.
RobinsonS. A.LachmanM. E. (2017). Perceived control and aging: A mini-review and directions for future research. Gerontology, 63(5), 435–442.
39.
RossiA. L. (2001). Developmental roots of adult social responsibility. In RossiA. L. (Ed.), Caring and doing for others: Social responsibility in the domains of family, work, and community (pp. 227–320). The University of Chicago Press.
40.
SchiemanS. (2001). Age, education, and the sense of control: A test of the cumulative advantage hypothesis. Research on Aging, 23(2), 153–178.
41.
SchneiderT. R. (2004). The role of neuroticism on psychological and physiological stress responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(6), 795–804.
42.
SkinnerE. A. (1996). A Guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 549–570.
43.
SlagsvoldB.SørensenA. (2008). Age, education, and the gender gap in the sense of control. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 67(1), 25–42.
44.
TerraccianoA.CostaP. T.JrMcCraeR. R. (2006). Personality plasticity after age 30. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(8), 999–1009.
45.
University of Wisconsin–Madison Institute on Aging. (2020). Midlife in the United States: A national longitudinal study of health & well-being. http://midus.wisc.edu/
46.
VinkersC. H.JoëlsM.MilaneschiY.KahnR. S.PenninxB. W. J. H.BoksM. P. M. (2014). Stress exposure across the life span cumulatively increases depression risk and is moderated by neuroticism. Depression and Anxiety, 31, 737–745.
47.
WareJ. E.SherbourneC. D. (1992). The MOS 36-Item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483.
48.
WatrobaW. T. (2018). Trans-generational regime of late capitalism: Introducing a new sociology of generation. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Thought, 7(3), 181–200.
49.
WestonS. J.GrahamE. K.TurianoN. A.AschwandenD.BoothT.HarrisonF.JamesB. D.LewisN. A.MakkarS. R.MuellerS.WisniewskiK. M.YonedaT.ZhaoyangR.SpiroA.DreweliesJ.WagnerG. G.Steinhagen-ThiessenE.DemuthI.WillisS.…MroczekD. K. (2020). Is healthy neuroticism associated with chronic conditions? A coordinated integrative data analysis. Collabra: Psychology, 6(1), 42.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
