We investigate how preloss marital quality is associated with changes in psychological distress and physical health among older widow(er)s. Using prospective data with a 2-year follow-up from the Health and Retirement Study, we selected 546 respondents who transitioned into widowhood. Respondents were classified as supportive, ambivalent, aversive, or neutral groups. The supportive and ambivalent group experienced greater increase in depressive symptoms compared to the aversive group, in widowhood. The aversive group showed greater increase in chronic conditions compared to the supportive group. Findings indicated that spousal loss may result in more psychological distress for those with supportive and ambivalent marital relationship. Yet, those with mostly negative accounts of their marriage may experience worsened physical health, albeit no increase in psychological distress. Understanding different benefits and challenges facing older individuals after a positive or negative marriage may help direct support and interventions efforts toward older couples during marriage and in widowhood.
AbakoumkinG.StroebeW.StroebeM. (2010). Does relationship quality moderate the impact of marital bereavement on depressive symptoms?Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29(5), 510–526. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2010.29.5.510
2.
AndresenE. M.MalmgrenJ. A.CarterW. B.PatrickD. L. (1994). Screening for depression in well older adults: Evaluation of a short form of the ces-d. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 10(2), 77–84.
3.
BirminghamW. C.UchinoB. N.SmithT. W.LightK. C.ButnerJ. (2015). It’s complicated: Marital ambivalence on ambulatory blood pressure and daily interpersonal functioning. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 49(5), 743–753.
4.
BonannoG. A.WortmanC. B.LehmanD. R.TweedR. G.HaringM.SonnegaJ.CarrD.NesseR. M. (2002). Resilience to loss and chronic grief: A prospective study from preloss to 18-months postloss. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1150–1164.
5.
BonannoG. A.WortmanC. B.NesseR. M. (2004). Prospective patterns of resilience and maladjustment during widowhood. Psychology and Aging, 19(2), 260–271.
6.
BowlbyJ. (1980). Attachment and loss (Vol. 3). Basic books.
7.
CarrD. (2004). Gender, preloss marital dependence, and older adults’ adjustment to widowhood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(1), 220–235.
8.
CarrD.Bodnar-DerenS. (2009). Gender, aging and widowhood. In UhlenbergP. (Ed.), International handbook of population aging (Vol. 1, pp. 705–728). Springer.
9.
CarrD.BoernerK. (2009). Do spousal discrepancies in marital quality assessments affect psychological adjustment to widowhood?Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(3), 495–509.
10.
CarrD.FreedmanV. A.CornmanJ. C.SchwarzN. (2014). Happy marriage, happy life? Marital quality and subjective well-being in later life. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(5), 930–948.
11.
CarrD.HouseJ. S.KesslerR. C.NesseR. M.SonnegaJ.WortmanC. (2000). Marital quality and psychological adjustment to widowhood among older adults a longitudinal analysis. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55(4), S197–S207.
12.
CarrD.UtzR. (2001). Late-life widowhood in the United States: New directions in research and theory. Ageing International, 27(1), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-001-1016-3
13.
ChoiH.MarksN. F. (2006). Transition to caregiving, marital disagreement, and psychological well-being: A prospective U.S. National study. Journal of Family Issues, 27(12), 1701–1722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x06291523
14.
ChoiH.MarksN. F. (2008). Marital conflict, depressive symptoms, and functional impairment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(2), 377–390.
15.
ChoiK. H.VasunilashornS. (2014). Widowhood, age heterogamy, and health: The role of selection, marital quality, and health behaviors. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69B(1), 123–134.
16.
ChoiN. G.HaJ.-H. (2011). Relationship between spouse/partner support and depressive symptoms in older adults: Gender difference. Aging & Mental Health, 15(3), 307–317.
17.
ClarkeP.FisherG.HouseJ.SmithJ.WeirD. (2007). Guide to content of the hrs psychosocial leave-behind participant lifestyle questionnaires: 2004 & 2006. https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/publications/biblio/5723
18.
ConnidisI. A. (2015). Exploring ambivalence in family ties: Progress and prospects. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12150
19.
DonohoC. J.CrimminsE. M.SeemanT. E. (2013). Marital quality, gender, and markers of inflammation in the midus cohort. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(1), 127–141.
FingermanK. L.HayE. L.BirdittK. S. (2004). The best of ties, the worst of ties: Close, problematic, and ambivalent social relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(3), 792–808. https://doi.org/10.2307/3600228
22.
FitzmauriceG. (2001). A conundrum in the analysis of change. Nutrition, 17(4), 360–361.
23.
FreedmanV. A.CornmanJ. C.CarrD. (2014). Is spousal caregiving associated with enhanced well-being? New evidence from the panel study of income dynamics. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 69(6), 861–869. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbu004
24.
FuttermanA.GallagherD.ThompsonL. W.LovettS.GilewskiM. (1990). Retrospective assessment of marital adjustment and depression during the first two years of spousal bereavement. Psychology and Aging, 5, 277–283.
25.
GrundyE.HoltG. (2001). The socioeconomic status of older adults: How should we measure it in studies of health inequalities?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 55(12), 895–904. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.55.12.895
26.
Itzhar-NabarroZ.SmoskiM. J. (2012). A review of theoretical and empirical perspectives on marital satisfaction and bereavement outcomes: Implications for working with older adults. Clinical Gerontologist, 35(3), 257–269.
27.
LillardL. A.WaiteL. J. (1995). Til death do us part: Marital disruption and mortality. American Journal of Sociology, 1131–1156.
28.
LopataH. Z. (1981). Widowhood and husband sanctification. Journal of Marriage and Family, 43(2), 439–450. https://doi.org/10.2307/351394
29.
LüscherK.PillemerK. (1998). Intergenerational ambivalence: A new approach to the study of parent-child relations in later life. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60(2), 413–425.
30.
ManciniA. D.RobinaughD.ShearK.BonannoG. A. (2009). Does attachment avoidance help people cope with loss? The moderating effects of relationship quality. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(10), 1127–1136. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20601
31.
MartireL. M.SchulzR.WroschC.NewsomJ. T. (2003). Perceptions and implications of received spousal care: Evidence from the caregiver health effects study. Psychology and Aging, 18(3), 593–601. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.18.3.593
32.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2008). An attachment perspective on bereavement. In StroebeM. S.HanssonR. O.SchutH.StroebeW. (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research and practice: Advances in theory and intervention (Vol. xiv, pp. 87–112). American Psychological Association.
33.
OttC. H.LuegerR. J.KelberS. T.PrigersonH. G. (2007). Spousal bereavement in older adults: Common, resilient, and chronic grief with defining characteristics. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195(4), 332–341.
34.
ParkesC. M. (1988). Bereavement as a psychosocial transition: Processes of adaptation to change. Journal of Social Issues, 44(3), 53–65.
35.
ParkesC. M.WeissR. S. (1983). Recovery from bereavement. Basic Books.
36.
PearlinL. I.MenaghanE. G.LiebermanM. A.MullanJ. T. (1981). The stress process. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22(4), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136676
37.
PrigersonH. G.MaciejewskiP. K.RosenheckR. A. (2000). Preliminary explorations of the harmful interactive effects of widowhood and marital harmony on health, health service use, and health care costs. The Gerontologist, 40(3), 349–357.
38.
PruchnoR. A.CartwrightF. P.Wilson-GendersonM. (2009). Effects of marital closeness on the transition from caregiving to widowhood. Aging and Mental Health, 13(6), 808–817.
39.
RendallM. S.WedenM. M.FavreaultM. M.WaldronH. (2011). The protective effect of marriage for survival: A review and update. Demography, 48(2), 481–506.
40.
SandbergJ. G.HarperJ. M.HillJ.MillerR. B.YorgasonJ. B.DayR. D. (2013). “What happens at home does not necessarily stay at home”: The relationship of observed negative couple interaction with physical health, mental health, and work satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(4), 808–821. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12039
41.
SassonI.UmbersonD. J. (2014). Widowhood and depression: New light on gender differences, selection, and psychological adjustment. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69B(1), 135–145.
42.
SchaanB. (2013). Widowhood and depression among older Europeans—The role of gender, caregiving, marital quality, and regional context. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68(3), 431–442. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt015
43.
SchulzR.MendelsohnA. B.HaleyW. E.MahoneyD.AllenR. S.ZhangS.ThompsonL.BelleS. H. (2003). End-of-life care and the effects of bereavement on family caregivers of persons with dementia. New England Journal of Medicine, 349(20), 1936–1942.
SuitorJ. J.GilliganM.PillemerK. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring intergenerational ambivalence in later life. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66(6), 769–781. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr108
47.
ThoitsP. A. (2010). Stress and health: Major findings and policy implications. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(1_suppl), S41–S53.
48.
ThompsonM. M.ZannaM. P.GriffinD. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361–386). Erlbaum.
49.
UchinoB. N.Holt-LunstadJ.SmithT. W.BloorL. (2004). Heterogeneity in social networks: A comparison of different models linking relationships to psychological outcomes. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(2), 123–139.
50.
UmbersonD.WilliamsK. (2005). Marital quality, health, and aging: Gender equity?Journals of Gerontology B: Psychological and Social Sciences, 60B(Special Issue II), 109–112.
51.
UmbersonD.WilliamsK.PowersD. A.LiuH.NeedhamB. (2006). You make me sick: Marital quality and health over the life course. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 47(1), 1–16.
52.
WalkerR. B.LuszczM. A. (2009). The health and relationship dynamics of late-life couples: A systematic review of the literature. Ageing and Society, 29(03), 455–480.
53.
WhismanM. A.UebelackerL. A. (2006). Impairment and distress associated with relationship discord in a national sample of married or cohabiting adults. Journal of Family Psychology, 20(3), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.20.3.369
54.
WickramaK. A. S.LorenzF. O.CongerR. D.ElderG. H. (1997). Marital quality and physical illness: A latent growth curve analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59(1), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.2307/353668
55.
WilcoxS.EvensonK. R.AragakiA.Wassertheil-SmollerS.MoutonC. P.LoevingerB. L. (2003). The effects of widowhood on physical and mental health, health behaviors, and health outcomes: The women’s health initiative. Health Psychology, 22(5), 513–522.
56.
WilliamsK. (2004). The transition to widowhood and the social regulation of health: Consequences for health and health risk behavior. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 59(6), S343–S349.
57.
WindsorT. D.ButterworthP. (2010). Supportive, aversive, ambivalent, and indifferent partner evaluations in midlife and young-old adulthood. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65(3), 287–295.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
