A Comparative Case Study Analysis of Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing the Affordable Care Act’s Balancing Incentive Program

Abstract

The Affordable Care Act included the opportunity for states to increase spending on Medicaid home and community-based services (HCBS) for older adults and persons with disabilities through the Balancing Incentive Program (BIP). This study utilized comparative case studies to identify the factors that facilitated or impeded states’ implementation of BIP. Findings indicate factors that facilitated the implementation of BIP were communication with the federal government and its contractor, merging BIP with existing HCBS programs, and enhanced federal revenue. On the other hand, the short duration of BIP, state procurement and contracting processes, and the need to incorporate feedback from non-governmental stakeholders and determining how to spend the enhanced revenue proved challenging for some states. This research suggests ways federal and state officials can implement new initiatives to achieve greater rebalancing of Medicaid long-term services and supports for older adults.

Keywords

home and community-based services policy implementation Affordable Care Act Medicaid

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

S. M.

Piette

Mor

(2014). The adverse consequences of unmet needs among older persons living in the community: Dual-eligible verse Medicare-only beneficiaries. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(S1), S51–S58. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbu124

Ansell

Sorensen

Torfing

(2017). Improving policy implementation through collaborative policymaking. Policy & Politics, 45(3), 467–486.

Berman

(1978). The study of macro- and micro- implementation. Public Policy, 26(2), 157–184.

Berry

F. S.

Berry

W. D.

Foster

S. K.

(1998). The determinants of success in implementing expert system in state government. Public Administration Review, 58(4), 293–305.

Binette

Vasold

(2018). Home and community preferences: A national survey of adults ages 18-Plus. AARP. https://www.aarp.org/research/topics/community/info-2018/2018-home-community-preference.html

Bode

Firbank

(2009). Barriers to co-governance: Examining the “chemistry” of home-care networks in Germany, England, and Quebec. The Policy Studies Journal, 37(2), 325–351.

Bustamante

A. V.

Mendez

C. A.

(2015). Regulating self-selection into private health insurance in Chile and the United States. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 31(3), 219–234.

Campos

P. A.

Reich

M. R.

(2019). Political Analysis for Health Policy Implementation. Health Systems Reform 5(3): 224–235.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2016). Nursing Home Compare data archive. Retrieved from https://data.medicare.gov/data/archives/nursing-home-compare.

10.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2017). Home Health Compare data archive. Retrieved from https://data.medicare.gov/data/archives/home-health-compare.

11.

Chidambaram

Musumeci

(2021, March 15). Potential impact of additional federal funds for Medicaid HCBS for seniors and people with disabilities. Kaiser Family Foundation. https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/potential-impact-of-additional-federal-funds-for-medicaid-hcbs-for-seniors-and-people-with-disabilities/” https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/potential-impact-of-additional-federal-funds-for-medicaid-hcbs-for-seniors-and-people-with-disabilities/

12.

Daniel

Jamie L.

Fyall

(2019). The Intersection of Nonprofit Roles and Public Policy Implementation. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(6), 1351–1371.

13.

deLeon

(2002). What ever happened to policy implementation? An alternative approach. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(4), 467–492.

14.

Eiken

Sredl

Burwell

Amos

(2018). Medicaid expenditures for long-term services and supports in FY 2016. IBM Watson Health.

15.

Favreault

Dey

(2015). Long-term services and supports for older Americans: Risk and financing research brief. Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. https://aspe.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/106211/ElderLTCrb-rev.pdf

16.

Freeman

V. A.

Spillman

B. C.

(2014). The residential continuum from home to nursing home: Size, characteristics and unmet needs of older adults. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(7), S42–S50. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbu120

17.

Friss Feinberg

Newman

S. L.

(2004). A study of 10 states since passage of the national family caregiver support program: Policies, perceptions, and program development. The Gerontologist, 44(6), 760–769.

18.

Friss Feinberg

Newman

S. L.

(2006). Preliminary experiences of the states in implementing the national family caregiver support program: A 50-state study. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 18(3/4), 95–113.

19.

George

Bennett

(2005). Case studies and theory development. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.

20.

Gibson

M. J.

Verma

S. K.

(2006). Just getting by: Unmet need for personal assistance service among persons 50 or older with disabilities. AARP Public Policy Institute. http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/il/2006_25_disability.pdf

21.

Glaser

B. G.

Strauss

A. L.

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing Company.

22.

Goggin

M. L.

(1986). ‘Two few cases/too many variables’ problem in implementation research. The Western Political Quarterly, 39(2), 328–347.

23.

Hjern

Porter

D. O.

(1981). Implementation structures: A new unit of administrative analysis. Organization Studies, 2(3), 211–227.

24.

Hudson

Hunter

Peckham

, (2019). Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap: can policy support programs help? Policy Design and Practice, 2(1), 1–14.

25.

Karon

S. L.

Knowles

Lyda-Mcdonald

Thach

Wiener

J. M.

(2019). Final outcome evaluation of the balancing incentive program. Office of Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. https://aspe.hhs.gov/basic-report/final-outcome-evaluation-balancing-incentive-program

26.

Klinger

C. A.

Howell

Zakus

Deber

R. B.

(2014). Barriers and facilitators to care for the terminally ill: A cross-country case comparison study of Canada, England, Germany, and the United States. Palliative Medicine, 28(2), 111–120.

27.

Koontz

T. M.

Newig

(2014). From planning to implementation: Top-down and bottom-up approaches for collaborative watershed management. The Policy Studies Journal, 42(3), 416–442.

28.

Kramer

B. J.

Cote

S. D.

Lee

D. I.

Creekmur

Saliba

(2017). Barriers and facilitators to implementation of VA home-based primary care on American Indian reservations: A qualitative multi-case study. Implementation Science, 12, 109.

29.

Lipsky

(1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.

30.

Matland

R. E.

(1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity- conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 145–174.

31.

Meier

K. J.

McFarlane

D. R.

(1995). Statutory coherence and policy implementation: The case of family planning. Journal of Public Policy 15(3), 281–298.

32.

Miller

E. A.

(2014). Block granting medicaid: A model for 21st century health reform? Routledge.

33.

O’Malley Watts

Reaves

E. L.

Musumeci

(2015). Medicaid balancing incentive program: A survey of participating states. Kaiser Family Foundation. https://www.kff.org/medicaid/report/medicaid-balancing-incentive-program-a-survey-of-participating-states/

34.

Rubin

H. J.

Rubin

I. S.

(2005). Qualitative interviewing: The Art of hearing data. Sage.

35.

Sabatier

Mazamnian

(1980). The implementation of public policy: A framework of analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 8(4), 538–560.

36.

Saldana

(2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.

37.

Thomas

K. S.

Allen

S. M.

(2016). Interagency partnership to deliver veteran-directed home and community-based services: Interviews with aging and disability network agency personnel regarding their experience with partner department of veterans affairs medical centers. Journal of Rehabilitation Research Development, 53(5), 611–618.

38.

Tummers

L. G.

Bekkers

V. J. J. M.

(2014). Policy implementation, street-level bureaucracy and the importance of discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527–547.

39.

Van Meter

D. S.

Van Horn

C. E.

(1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445–488.

40.

Williams

Lyons

Rowland

(1997). Unmet long-term care needs of elderly people in the community: A review of the literature. Home Health Care Services Quarterly, 16(1–2), 93–119.