Touch is an important element of human social interaction linked to various dimensions of well-being, but we know little of how it is distributed among older adults. This study considers whether greeting/affectionate touch is a function of characteristics such as race, gender, and socioeconomic status. Data come from Wave 1 (2005–2006) of the NSHAP study from the United States. Results reveal that women experienced more frequent touch relative to men, net of several features of the interpersonal environment. Mediation analyses revealed that gender differences in associations with touch were partially explained by women’s greater participation in formal and informal social activity. No patterns were detected related to race, education, or wealth. This study situates greeting/affectionate touch as a form of corporeal non-verbal interaction that offers a unique lens into patterns of social connection. We close by considering what this form of interaction means in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.
AbramsonC. M. (2015). The end game: How inequality shapes our final years. Harvard University Press
2.
AdayR. H.KehoeG. C.FarneyL. A. (2006). Impact of senior center friendships on aging women who live alone. Journal of Women & Aging, 18(1), 57–73.
3.
AjrouchK. J.AntonucciT. C.JanevicM. R. (2001). Social networks among Blacks and Whites: The interaction between race and age. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 56(2), S112–S118.
4.
AjrouchK. J.BlandonA. Y.AntonucciT. C. (2005). Social networks among men and women: The effects of age and socioeconomic status. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60(6), S311–S317.
5.
AntonucciT.AkiyamaH.TakahashiK. (2004). Attachment and close relationships across the life span. Attachment & Human Development, 6(4), 353–370.
6.
BakasT.AustinJ. K.JessupS. L.WilliamsL. S.OberstM. T. (2004). Time and difficulty of tasks provided by family caregivers of stroke survivors. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 36(2), 95.
7.
BaldassarL. (2007). Transnational families and the provision of moral and emotional support: The relationship between truth and distance. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 14(4), 385–409.
8.
BearmanP.ParigiP. (2004). Cloning headless frogs and other important matters: Conversation topics and network structure. Social Forces, 83(2), 535–557.
9.
BerkmanL. F.GlassT.BrissetteI.SeemanT. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science & Medicine, 51(6), 843–857.
10.
BurgoonJ. K.WaltherJ. B.BaeslerE. J. (1992). Interpretations, evaluations, and consequences of interpersonal touch. Human Communication Research, 19(2), 237–263.
11.
ChattersL. M.TaylorR. J.LincolnK. D. (1999). African American religious participation: A multi-sample comparison. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38(1), 132–145.
12.
CoanJ. A.SchaeferH. S.DavidsonR. J. (2006). Lending a hand: Social regulation of the neural response to threat. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1032–1039.
13.
CornwellB. (2015). Social disadvantage and network turnover. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70(1), 132–142.
14.
CornwellB.LaumannE. O.SchummL. P. (2008). The social connectedness of older adults: A national profile. American Sociological Review, 73(2), 185–203.
15.
DanneferD. (2003). Cumulative advantage/disadvantage and the life course: Cross-fertilizing age and social science theory. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58(6), S327–S337.
16.
DebrotA.SchoebiD.PerrezM.HornA. B. (2014). Stroking your beloved one’s white bear: Responsive touch by the romantic partner buffers the negative effect of thought suppression on daily mood. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 33(1), 75–97.
17.
DibiaseR.GunnoeJ. (2004). Gender and culture differences in touching behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(1), 49–62.
18.
DorrosS.HanzalA.SegrinC. (2008). The Big Five personality traits and perceptions of touch to intimate and nonintimate body regions. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(4), 1067–1073.
19.
EinolfC.ChambréS. M. (2011). Who volunteers? Constructing a hybrid theory. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 16(4), 298–310.
20.
EstabrooksC. A. (1989). Touch: A nursing strategy in the intensive care unit. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Critical Care, 18(4), 392–401.
21.
FeldmanS. I.DowneyG.Schaffer-NeitzR. (1999). Pain, negative mood, and perceived support in chronic pain patients: A daily diary study of people with reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(5), 776–785.
22.
FerraroK. F.ShippeeT. P. (2009). Aging and cumulative inequality: How does inequality get under the skin?The Gerontologist, 49(3), 333–343.
23.
FieldT. (2010). Touch for socioemotional and physical well-being: A review. Developmental Review, 30(4), 367–383.
24.
FischerC. S. (1982). To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. University of Chicago Press.
25.
FischerC. S.BeresfordL. (2015). Changes in support networks in late middle age: The extension of gender and educational differences. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70(1), 123–131.
26.
FlórezK. R.Ghosh-DastidarM. B.BeckmanR.HayeK.DuruO. K.Abraído-LanzaA. F.DubowitzT. (2016). The power of place: Social network characteristics, perceived neighbourhood features, and psychological distress among African Americans in the historic Hill District in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. American Journal of Community Psychology, 58(1–2), 60–68.
27.
FontesL. A. (2012). Interviewing clients across cultures: A practitioner’s guide. Guilford Press.
28.
GallaceA. (2012). Living with touch. Psychologist, 25(12), 896–899.
29.
GallaceA.SpenceC. (2010). The science of interpersonal touch: An overview. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(2), 246–259.
30.
GriffinM. L.AmodeoM.ClayC.FasslerI.EllisM. A. (2006). Racial differences in social support: Kin versus friends. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76(3), 374–380.
31.
GuerreroL. K.AndersenP. A. (1991). The waxing and waning of relational intimacy: Touch as a function of relational stage, gender and touch avoidance. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8(2), 147–165.
32.
HalberstadtA. G. (1985). Race, socioeconomic status, and nonverbal behavior. In SiegmanA. W.FeldsteinS. (Eds.), Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 227–266). Eribaum.
33.
HallJ. A.CoatsE. J.Smith LeBeauL. (2005). Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: A metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 898–924.
34.
HallJ. A.VecciaE. M. (1990). More “touching” observations: New insights on men, women, and interpersonal touch. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1155–1162.
35.
HenleyN. M. (1973). Status and sex: Some touching observations. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2(2), 91–93.
36.
HertensteinM. J.HolmesR.McCulloughM.KeltnerD. (2009). The communication of emotion via touch. Emotion, 9(4), 566–573.
37.
HertensteinM. J.KeltnerD. (2011). Gender and the communication of emotion via touch. Sex Roles, 64(1-2), 70–80.
HeslinR.NguyenT. D.NguyenM. L. (1983). Meaning of touch: The case of touch from a stranger or same sex person. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 7, 147–157.
40.
Holt-LunstadJ.BirminghamW. A.LightK. C. (2008). Influence of a “warm touch” support enhancement intervention among married couples on ambulatory blood pressure, oxytocin, alpha amylase, and cortisol. Psychosomatic Medicine, 70(9), 976–985.
41.
HouseJ. S. (1987). Social support and social structure. Sociological Forum2,135–146.
42.
JakubiakB. K.FeeneyB. C. (2017). Affectionate touch to promote relational, psychological, and physical well-being in adulthood: A theoretical model and review of the research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(3), 228–252.
43.
JonesS. E.YarbroughA. E. (1985). A naturalistic study of the meanings of touch. Communications Monographs, 52(1), 19–56.
44.
KarlsonK. B.HolmA.BreenR. (2012). Comparing regression coefficients between same-sample nested models using logit and probit: A new method. Sociological Methodology, 42(1), 286–313.
45.
KawachiIBerkmanL.F. (2000). Social cohesion, social capital, and health. In BerkmanL. F.KawachiI. (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 174–190). Oxford University Press.
46.
KeithP. M.KimS.SchaferR. B. (2000). Informal ties of the unmarried in middle and later life: Who has them and who does not?Sociological Spectrum, 20(2), 221–238.
47.
KrauseN. (2002). Church-based social support and health in old age: Exploring variations by race. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57(6), S332–S347.
48.
KrauseN. (2006). Exploring the stress-buffering effects of church-based and secular social support on self-rated health in late life. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61(1), S35–S43.
49.
KringA. M.GordonA. H. (1998). Sex differences in emotion: Expression, experience, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 686–703.
50.
LeeJ. E.CichyK. E. (2020). Complex role of touch in social relationships for older adults’ cardiovascular disease risk. Research on Aging. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027520915793
51.
LiangJ.KrauseN. M.BennettJ. M. (2001). Social exchange and well-being: Is giving better than receiving?Psychology and Aging, 16(3), 511–523.
52.
LieblerC. A.SandefurG. D. (2002). Gender differences in the exchange of social support with friends, neighbors, and co-workers at midlife. Social Science Research, 31(3), 364–391.
53.
LökenL. S.OlaussonH. (2010). The skin as a social organ. Experimental Brain Research, 204(3), 305–314.
54.
MarsdenP. V. (1987). Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, 52(1), 122–131.
55.
McDanielE.AndersenP. A. (1998). International patterns of interpersonal tactile communication: A field study. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 22(1), 59–75.
56.
McDonaldS.LinN.AoD. (2009). Networks of opportunity: Gender, race, and job leads. Social Problems, 56(3), 385–402.
57.
MickelsonK. D.KubzanskyL. D. (2003). Social distribution of social support: The mediating role of life events. American Journal of Community Psychology, 32(3/4), 265–281.
58.
Morrow-HowellN. (2006). Civic service across the life course. Generations, 30(4), 37–42.
59.
MusickM. A.WilsonJ. (2003). Volunteering and depression: The role of psychological and social resources in different age groups. Social Science & Medicine, 56(2), 259–269.
60.
NicholsonN. R. (2012). A review of social isolation: An important but underassessed condition in older adults. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 33(2–3), 137–152.
61.
OjanlatvaA. (1994). Touch as a human tool. Medical Teacher, 16(4), 347–353.
62.
PiperH.SmithH. (2003). ‘Touch’ in educational and child-care settings: Dilemmas and responses. British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), 879–894.
63.
PlickertG.CoteR. R.WellmanB. (2007). It’s not who you know, it’s how you know them: Who exchanges what with whom?Social Networks, 29(3), 405–429.
64.
RadloffL. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401.
65.
RookK. S. (2001). Emotional health and positive versus negative social exchanges: A daily diary analysis. Applied Developmental Science, 5(2), 86–97.
66.
RussoV.OttavianiC.SpitoniG. F. (2020). Affective touch: A meta-analysis on sex differences. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 108, 445–452.
SchaferM. H.UpenieksL. (2016). The age-graded nature of advice: Distributional patterns and implications for life meaning. Social Psychology Quarterly, 79(1), 22–43.
69.
SchirmerA.TehK. S.WangS.VijayakumarR.ChingA.NithiananthamD.CheokA. D. (2011). Squeeze me, but don’t tease me: Human and mechanical touch enhance visual attention and emotion discrimination. Social Neuroscience, 6(3), 219–230.
70.
ShankarA.McMunnA.DemakakosP.HamerM.SteptoeA. (2017). Social isolation and loneliness: Prospective associations with functional status in older adults. Health Psychology, 36(2), 179–187.
71.
SimsS. (1988). The significance of touch in palliative care. Palliative Medicine, 2(1), 58–61.
72.
SmithK. P.ChristakisN. A. (2008). Social networks and health. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 405–429.
73.
TaylorR. J.MouzonD. M.NguyenA. W.ChattersL. M. (2016). Reciprocal family, friendship and church support networks of African Americans: Findings from the national survey of American life. Race and Social Problems, 8(4), 326–339.
74.
ThoitsP. A. (2011). Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52(2), 145–161.
75.
ThomasP. A. (2009). Is it better to give or to receive? Social support and the well-being of older adults. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65(3), 351–357.
76.
ThomasP. A.KimS. (2020). Lost touch? Implications of physical touch for physical health. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences Advance Access. gbaa134. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa134
77.
UpenieksL.SettelsJ.SchaferM. H. (2018). For everything a season? A month-by-month analysis of social network resources in later life. Social science research, 69, 111–125.
78.
Van GroenouM. B.DeegD. J. (2010). Formal and informal social participation of the ‘young-old’ in the Netherlands in 1992 and 2002. Ageing & Society, 30(3), 445–465.
79.
Von HippelP. T. (2007). Regression with missing Ys: An improved strategy for analyzing multiply imputed data. Sociological Methodology, 37(1), 83–117.
80.
WaiteL. J.HarrisonS. C. (1992). Keeping in touch: How women in mid-life allocate social contacts among kith and kin. Social Forces, 70(3), 637–654.
81.
WessbergJ.OlaussonH.FernströmK. W.VallboÅ. B. (2003). Receptive field properties of unmyelinated tactile afferents in the human skin. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89(3), 1567–1575.
82.
WymerW. W.Jr. (1999). Understanding volunteer markets: The case of senior volunteers. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 6(2-3), 1–23.
