Research shows that ageism (systemic discrimination against people because of their age) significantly undermines physical and psychological wellbeing, particularly among older adults. Our aim is to contribute to the literature by investigating whether this negative association varies across national religious context. We estimate multilevel models by drawing on a subset of data (ages 55 and above) from the fourth round of the European Social Survey (2008/2009). We find that ageism is negatively related to measures of wellbeing (happiness, life satisfaction, self-rated health). More importantly, the relationship is less pronounced in countries with higher levels of religiosity. These findings suggest that the country’s religious environment serves as a buffer against deleterious health consequences of ageism for the older population. Our study thus provides additional evidence on ageism as a critical risk factor and sheds novel light on the moderating role of country-level religiosity as a protective factor.
AhrenfeldtL. J.MöllerS.Andersen-RanbergK.VitvedA. R.Lindahl-JacobsenR.HvidtN. C. (2017). Religiousness and health in Europe. European Journal of Epidemiology, 32, 921–929.
2.
AjrouchK. J.AntonucciT. C.JanevicM. R. (2001). Social networks among Blacks and Whites: The interaction between race and age. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 56, S112–S118.
3.
AnderssonM. A.WilkinsonL. R.SchaferM. H. (2019). Does the association between age and major illness vary by healthcare system quality?Research on Aging, 41(10), 988–1013.
4.
AnninkA.GorgievskiM.Den DulkL. (2016). Financial hardship and well-being: A cross-national comparison among the European self-employed. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(5), 645–657.
5.
BiermanA. (2006). Does religion buffer the effects of discrimination on mental health? Differing effects by race. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 45(4), 551–565.
6.
BlanchardT. C.BartkowskiJ. P.MatthewsT. D.KerleyK. R. (2008). Faith, morality, and mortality: The ecological impact of religion on population health. Social Forces, 86(4), 1591–1620.
7.
BradshawM.KentB. V. (2018). Prayer, attachment to God, and changes in psychological well-being in later life. Journal of Aging and Health, 30(5), 667–691.
8.
BurnesD.SheppardC.HendersonC. R.WasselM.CopeR.BarberC.PillemerK. (2019). Interventions to reduce ageism against older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 109(8), e1–e9.
9.
Campos-MatosI.SubramanianS. V.KawachiI. (2016). ‘The dark side of social capital’: trust and self-rated health in European countries. European Journal of Public Health, 26(1), 90–95.
10.
ChangE.-S.KannothS.LevyS.WangS.-Y.LeeJ. E.LevyB. R. (2020). Global reach of ageism on older persons’ health: A systematic review. PLoS One, 15(1), e0220857. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220857
11.
ChenD.YangT. (2014). The pathways from perceived discrimination to self-rated health: An investigation of the roles of distrust, social capital, and health behaviors. Social Science & Medicine, 104, 64–73.
12.
CohenS.WillsT. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357.
13.
DingemansE.Van IngenE. (2015). Does religion breed trust? A cross-national study of the effects of religious involvement, religious faith, and religious context on social trust. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 54(4), 739–755.
14.
DrakefordL. (2019). Mental health and the role of religious context among inmates in State and Federal prisons: Results from a multilevel analysis. Society and Mental Health, 9(1), 51–73.
15.
DrakefordL.ParksV.SlackT.RamchandR.FinucaneM.LeeM. R. (2020). Oil spill disruption and problem drinking: Assessing the impact of community religiosity in Gulf Coast communities. Population Research and Policy Review, 39, 119–146.
16.
DurkheimE. (1952). Suicide. Free Press. (Original work published 1897)
17.
EllisonC. G.MusickM. A.HendersonA. H. (2008). Balm in Gilead, racism, religious involvement and psychological distress among African American adults. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 47, 291–309.
18.
HastingsO. P.RoeserK. K. (2020). Happiness in hard times: Does religion buffer the negative effect of unemployment on happiness?Social Forces, soaa018. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soaa018
19.
IdlerE.KaslS. V. (1997). Religion among disabled and nondisabled elderly persons I: Cross-sectional patterns in health practices, social activities and well-being. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 52 B, S294–S305.
20.
JacksonS. E.HackettR. A.SteptoeA. (2019). Associations between age discrimination and health and wellbeing: Cross-sectional and prospective analysis of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Lancet Public Health, 4, 200–208.
21.
JoshanlooM.WeijersD. (2016). Religiosity reduces the negative influence of injustice on subjective well-being: A study in 121 nations. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 11(2), 601–612.
22.
JungJ. H. (2018). Country-level differences in the effects of financial hardship on life satisfaction: The role of religious context and age-contingent buffering. Society and Mental Health, 8(2), 123–140.
23.
KelleyJ.EvansM. D. R. (2017). Societal income inequality and individual subjective well-being: Results from 68 societies and over 200,000 individuals, 1981-2008. Social Science Research, 62, 1–23.
24.
KrauseN. (2008). Aging in the church: How social relationships affect health. Templeton Press.
25.
KruegerP. M.DovelK.DennyJ. T. (2015). Democracy and self-rated health across 67 countries: A multilevel analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 143, 137–144.
26.
LeeY.BiermanA. (2019). Loneliness as a mediator of perceived discrimination and depression: Examining education contingencies. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 89(2), 206–227.
27.
LiefbroerA. C.RijkenA. (2019). The association between Christianity and marriage attitudes in Europe. Does religious context matter?European Sociological Review35(3), 363–379.
28.
LyonsA.AlbaB.HeywoodW.FilebornB.MinichielloV.BarrettC.HinchliffS.MaltaS.DowS. (2018). Experiences of ageism and the mental health of older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 22(11), 1456–1464.
29.
MossakowskiK. N.ZhangW. (2014). Does social support buffer the stress of discrimination and reduce psychological distress among Asian Americans?Social Psychology Quarterly, 77(3), 273–295.
30.
NorrisP.InglehartR. (2011). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
31.
OpsahlT.AhrenfeldtL. J.MöllerS.HvidtN. C. (2019). Religiousness and depressive symptoms in Europeans: Findings from the survey of health, ageing, and retirement in Europe. Public Health, 175, 111–119.
32.
OrrJ.TobinK.CareyD.KennyR. A.McGarrigleC. (2019). Religious attendance, religious importance, and the pathways to depressive symptoms in men and women aged 50 and over living in Ireland. Research on Aging, 41(9), 891–911.
33.
PearlinL. I. (1989). The sociological study of stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 30(3), 241–256.
PriemJ. S.SolomonD. H. (2015). Emotional support and physiological stress recovery: The role of support matching, adequacy, and invisibility. Communication Monographs, 82(1), 88–112.
36.
PudrovskaT.SchiemanS.PearlinL. I.NguyenK. (2005). The sense of mastery as a mediator and moderator in the association of economic hardship and health in later life.’Journal of Aging and Health, 17,634–660.
37.
PutnamR. D.CampbellD. E. (2010). American Grace: How religion divides and Unites us. Simon & Schuster.
38.
RaudenbushS.BrykA.CongdonR. (2019). HLM 8 for Windows [Computer software]. Scientific Software International, Inc.
39.
SchaferM. H. (2015). Religiously traditional, unusually supportive? Examining who gives, helps, and advises in Americans’ close networks. Social Currents, 2(1), 81–104.
40.
SchiemanS.MeersmanS. C. (2004). Neighborhood problems and health among older adults: Received and donated social support and the sense of mastery as effect modifiers. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B, 59(2), S89–S97.
41.
SharpS. (2018). Prayer and helping. Social Currents, 6(2), 141–162.
42.
SherkatD. E.ReedM. D. (1992). The effects of religion and social support of self-esteem and depression among the suddenly bereaved. Social Indicators Research, 26, 259–275.
43.
ShippeeT. P.WilkinsonL. R.ShaferM. H.ShippeeN. D. (2019). Long-term effects of age discrimination on mental health: The role of perceived financial strain. Journal of Gerontology, Social Sciences, 74, 664–674.
44.
StavrovaO.FetchenhauerD.SchlösserT. (2013). Why are religious people happy? The effect of the social norm of religiosity across countries. Social Science Research, 42, 90–105.
45.
StokesJ. E. (2019). Social integration, perceived discrimination, and self-esteem in mid-and later life: Intersections with age and neuroticism. Aging & Mental Health, 23, 727–735.
46.
StokesJ. E.MoormanS. M. (2020). Sticks and stones: Perceived age discrimination, well-being, and health over a 20-year period. Research on Aging, 42(3–4), 115–125.
47.
StroopeS.BakerJ. O. (2018). Whose moral community? Religiosity, secularity, and self-rated health across communal religious contexts. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 59(2), 185–199.
48.
SwiftH. J.VauclairC.AbramsD.BrattC.MarquesS.LimaM. (2014). Revisiting the paradox of well-being: The importance of national context. Journal of Gerontology, Series B, Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 69(6), 920–929.
49.
UchinoB. N. (2006). Social support and health: A review of physiological processes potentially underlying links to disease outcomes. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29, 377–387.
50.
UpenieksL.FoyS. L.MilesA. (2018). Beyond America: Comparing the impact of religious and secular organizational involvement on self-rated health cross-nationally. Socius, 4, 1–19.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
