The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to measure perceived social standing within an assisted living (PSS-AL), and to identify individual determinants and empirical correlates of this construct. The sample consisted of 200 residents of 21 assisted livings (ALs). A self-anchoring ladder measured PSS-AL (M = 6.95, SD = 2.04) and an open-ended follow-up question assessed individual determinants of PSS-AL ratings. In a multiple regression, mental health (β = .27, p = .001), intimate staff-resident relationships (β = .22, p = .024), and extraversion (β = .27, p < .001) were significant predictors of PSS-AL. Qualitative findings revealed that inter-personal factors, prosocial behaviors, and health were key determinants of PSS-AL. Results highlight the social demands of AL and associated implications for residents with varying social abilities, skills, and interests. Findings also suggest that staff-resident relationships may shape and-or reinforce resident social hierarchies. The authors discuss implications for research and practice.
AllanS.GilbertP. (1995). A social comparison scale: Psychometric properties and relationship to psychopathology. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(3), 293–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(95)00086-L
3.
Alzheimer’s Association. (2004). Research consent for cognitively impaired adults: Recommendations for institutional review boards and investigators. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 18(3), 171–175. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wad.0000137520.23370.56
4.
AndersonC.KrausM. W.GalinskyA. D.KeltnerD. (2012). The local-ladder effect: Social status and subjective well-being. Psychological Science, 23(7), 764–771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611434537
5.
AnderssonM. A. (2018). Modern social hierarchies and the spaces between: How are subjective status inconsistencies linked to mental well-being?Social Psychology Quarterly, 81(1), 48–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272517753687
6.
AyalonL. (2019). Subjective social status as a predictor of loneliness: The moderating effect of the type of long-term care setting. Research on Aging, 41(10), 915–935. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027519871674
7.
BrownR. A.AdlerN. E.WorthmanC. M.CopelandW. E.CostelloE. J.AngoldA. (2008). Cultural and community determinants of subjective social status among Cherokee and white youth. Ethnicity & Health, 13(4), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557850701837302
8.
BuschkeH.KuslanskyG.KatzM.StewartW. F.SliwinskiM. J.EckholdtH. M.LiptonR. B. (1999). Screening for dementia with the memory impairment screen. Neurology, 52(2), 231. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.52.2.231
9.
CahnD. A.SalmonD. P.MonschA. U.ButtersN.WiederholtW. C.Corey-BloomJ.Barrett-ConnorE. (1996). Screening for dementia of the Alzheimer type in the community: The utility of the clock drawing test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 11(6), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/11.6.529
10.
CarstensenL. L.IsaacowitzD. M.CharlesS. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165
11.
ConnorD. J.SewardJ. D.BauerJ. A.GoldenK. S.SalmonD. P. (2005). Performance of three clock scoring systems across different ranges of dementia severity. Alzheimer’s Disease & Associated Disorders, 19(3), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wad.0000174948.77113.a6
12.
CruzE. D. (2006). Elders’ and family caregivers’ experience of place at an assisted living center. OTJR: Occupation, Participation, and Health, 26(3), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/153944920602600303
13.
CundiffJ. M.SmithT. W.UchinoB. N.BergC. A. (2011). An interpersonal analysis of subjective social status and psychosocial risk. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30(1), 47–74. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2011.30.1.47
14.
CundiffJ. M.SmithT. W.UchinoB. N.BergC. A. (2013). Subjective social status: Construct validity and associations with psychosocial vulnerability and self-rated health. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 20(1), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-011-9206-1
15.
DemakakosP.BiddulphJ. P.de OliveiraC.TsakosG.MarmotM. G. (2018). Subjective social status and mortality: The English longitudinal study of ageing. European Journal of Epidemiology, 33(8), 729–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0410-z
16.
Di NapoliI.ArcidiaconoC. (2013). The use of self-anchoring scales in social research: The cantril scale for the evaluation of community action orientation. In DavinoC.FabbrisL. (Eds.), Survey data collection and integration (pp. 73–85). Springer-Verlag.
17.
DobbsD.EckertJ. K.RubinsteinB.KeimigL.ClarkL.FrankowskiA. C.ZimmermanS. (2008). An ethnographic study of stigma and ageism in residential care or assisted living. The Gerontologist, 48(4), 517–526. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/48.4.517
18.
DoyleP. J.de MedeirosK.SaundersP. A. (2012). Nested social groups within the social environment of a dementia care assisted living setting. Dementia, 11(3), 383–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301211421188
19.
FarmerT. W.TalbottB.DawesM.HuberH. B.BrooksD. S.PowersE. E. (2018). Social dynamics management: What is it and why is it important for intervention?Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 26(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426617752139
FragaleA. R.OverbeckJ. R.NealeM. A. (2011). Resources versus respect: Social judgments based on targets’ power and status positions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(4), 767–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.006
GeigerA. M.KirschbaumC.WolfJ. M. (2019). Comparison group matters for chronic stress effects of subjective social status. Journal of Health Psychology, 24(14), 1923–1928. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105317709511
24.
GiattiL.do Valle CameloL.de Castro RodriguesJ. F.BarretoS. M. (2012). Reliability of the MacArthur scale of subjective social status- Brazilian longitudinal study of adult health. BMC Public Health, 12(1), 1096. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-1096
25.
HaysR. D.BjornerJ. B.RevickiD. A.SpritzerK. L.CellaD. (2009). Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items. Quality of Life Research, 18(7), 873–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9496-9
26.
HaysR. D.HayashiT.StewartA. L. (1989). A five-item measure of socially desirable response set. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49(3), 629–636. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448904900315
27.
HoebelJ.MaskeU. E.ZeebH.LampertT. (2017). Social inequalities and depressive symptoms in adults: The role of objective and subjective socioeconomic status. PloS One, 12(1), e0169764. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169764
28.
HrybykG.RubinsteinR. L.EckertJ. K.FrankowskiA. C.KeimigL.NemecM.PeeplesA.RothE.DoyleP. J. (2012). The dark side: Stigma in purpose-built senior environments. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 26(1-3), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2012.651384
29.
HsiehH. F.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
30.
IecovichE.Lev-RanO. (2006). Attitudes of functionally independent residents toward residents who were disabled in old age homes: The role of separation versus integration. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 25(3), 252–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464806288565
31.
JiangX. L.CillessenA. H. N. (2005). Stability of continuous measures of sociometric status: A meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 25(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2004.08.008
KempC. L.BallM. M.HollingsworthC.PerkinsM. M. (2012). Strangers and friends: Residents’ social careers in assisted living. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67(4), 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs043
34.
KhatutskyG.OrmondC.WienerJ. M.GreeneA. M.JohnsonR.JessupE. A.Harris-KojetinL. (2016). Residential care communities and their residents in 2010: A national portrait (DHHS publication no. 2016–1041). National Center for Health Statistics.
35.
KilpatrickF. P.CantrilH. (1960). Self-anchoring scaling: A measure of individuals’ unique reality worlds. Journal of Individual Psychology, 16(2), 158–173.
36.
KoskiJ. E.XieH.OlsonI. R. (2015). Understanding social hierarchies: The neural and psychological foundations of status perception. Social Neuroscience, 10(5), 527–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2015.1013223
37.
LubbenJ.BlozikE.GillmannG.IliffeS.von Renteln KruseW.BeckJ. C.StuckA. E. (2006). Performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben social network scale among three European community-dwelling older adult populations. The Gerontologist, 46(4), 503–513. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/46.4.503
38.
MacMahonP.JahodaA. (2008). Social comparison and depression: People with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities. American Journal of Mental Retardation: AJMR, 113(4), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2008)113[307:SCADPW]2.0.CO;2
39.
MikamiA. Y.GriggsM. S.ReulandM. M.GregoryA. (2012). Teacher practices as predictors of children’s classroom social preference. Journal of School Psychology, 50(1), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.08.002
40.
O’CathainA.MurphyE.NichollJ. (2010). Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 341, c4587. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c4587
41.
ParkN. S.ZimmermanS.KinslowK.ShinH. J.RoffL. L. (2012). Social engagement in assisted living and implications for practice. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 31(2), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464810384480
42.
PerkinsM. M.BallM. M.WhittingtonF. J.HollingsworthC. (2012). Relational autonomy in assisted living: A focus on diverse care settings for older adults. Journal of Aging Studies, 26(2), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2012.01.001
43.
PlysE. (2019). Recreational activity in assisted living communities: A critical review and theoretical model. The Gerontologist, 59(3), e207–e222. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx138
44.
RammstedtB.JohnO. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the big five inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
45.
RosenbergD. E.GellN. M.JonesS. M.RenzA.KerrJ.GardinerP. A.ArterburnD. (2015). The feasibility of reducing sitting time in overweight and obese older adults. Health Education & Behavior, 42(5), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198115577378
46.
RouleauI.SalmonD. P.ButtersN.KennedyC.McGuireK. (1992). Quantitative and qualitative analyses of clock drawings in Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s disease. Brain and Cognition, 18(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2626(92)90112-Y
47.
SandhuN. K.KempC. L.BallM. M.BurgessE. O.PerkinsM. M. (2013). Coming together and pulling apart: Exploring the influence of functional status on co-resident relationships in assisted living. Journal of Aging Studies, 27(4), 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2013.07.001
48.
ScottB. A.JudgeT. A. (2009). The popularity contest at work: Who wins, why, and what do they receive?Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012951
49.
Singh-ManouxA.AdlerN. E.MarmotM. G. (2003). Subjective social status: Its determinants and its association with measures of ill-health in the Whitehall II study. Social Science & Medicine, 56(6), 1321–1333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00131-4
ZellE.StrickhouserJ. E.KrizanZ. (2018). Subjective social status and health: A meta-analysis of community and society ladders. Health Psychology, 37(10), 979–987. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000667
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
