Adult children are an important source of care providers for parents in a rapidly aging Chinese society, but we know little of which particular child is preferred by parents in time of need. Using the China Longitudinal Aging Social Survey, we investigate the factors associated with parental preference of caregivers and listeners among all his or her children. With children nested within each parent, we fit the conditional (family) fixed-effect fractional logit model. The main results for both caregivers and listeners suggest a preference for the unmarried, the oldest or the youngest, and children who have provided them with support before. Coresident children are favored in rural but not urban China. We did not find preference for sons over daughters. Neither did we find any effect of prior transfers from parents to children. Our findings shed light on the changing norms of eldercare provision in a transitioning society.
BaiY.ZhangL.LiuC.ShiY.MoD.RozelleS. (2017). Effect of parental migration on the academic performance of left behind children in North Western China. The Journal of Development Studies, 54, 1–17.
3.
BianF.LoganJ. R.BianY. (1998). Intergenerational relations in urban China: Proximity, contact, and help to parents. Demography, 35, 115–124.
4.
BucxF.van WelF.KnijnT. (2012). Life course status and exchanges of support between young adults and parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 101–115.
ChanK. W. (2010). The household registration system and migrant labor in China: Notes on a debate. Population and Development Review, 36, 357–364.
7.
ChenF.LiuG. (2009). Population aging in China. In PeterU. (Ed.), International handbook of population aging (pp. 157–172). New York, NY: Springer.
8.
ChenF.LiuG.MairC. A. (2011). Intergenerational ties in context: Grandparents caring for grandchildren in China. Social Forces, 90, 571.
9.
ChengS. T.ChanA. C. (2006). Filial piety and psychological well-being in well older Chinese. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61, P262–P269.
10.
CherlinA. (2012). Goode’s world revolution and family patterns: A reconsideration at fifty years. Population and Development Review, 38, 577–607.
11.
CongZ.SilversteinM. (2008). Intergenerational support and depression among elders in rural China: Do daughters-in-law matter?Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 599–612.
12.
CongZ.SilversteinM. (2014). Parents’ preferred care-givers in rural China: Gender, migration and intergenerational exchanges. Ageing and Society, 34, 727–752.
13.
Das GuptaM.ZhenghuaJ.BohuaL.ZhenmingX.ChungW.Hwa-OkB. (2003). Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. The Journal of Development Studies, 40, 153–187.
14.
FreedmanM. (1966). Chinese lineage and society: Fukien and Kwangtung. London, England: The Athlone Press.
15.
FrijtersP.JohnstonD.ShahM.ShieldsM. (2013). Intrahousehold resource allocation: Do parents reduce or reinforce child ability gaps?Demography, 50, 2187–2208.
16.
GoodeW. J. (1963). World revolution and family patterns. New York, NY: The Free Press.
17.
GottliebB. H. (1983). Social support as a focus for integrative research in psychology. American Psychologist, 38, 278–287.
18.
HannumE. (2005). Market transition: Educational disparities, and family strategies in rural China: New evidence on gender stratification and development. Demography, 42, 275–299.
19.
HolroydE. A.MackenzieA. E. (1995). A review of the historical and social processes contributing to care and caregiving in Chinese families. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22, 473–479.
20.
HuA. (2017). Providing more but receiving less: Daughters in intergenerational exchange in mainland China. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79, 739–757.
21.
JohnsonC. L. (1983). Dyadic family relations and social support. The Gerontologist, 23, 377–383.
22.
LeeS. C. (1953). China’s traditional family, its characteristics and disintegration. American Sociological Review, 18, 272–280.
23.
LiS.FeldmanM. W.JinX. (2004). Children, marriage form, and family support for the elderly in contemporary rural China: The case of Songzi. Research on Aging, 26, 352–384.
24.
LoganJ. R.BianF. (1999). Family values and coresidence with married children in urban China. Social Forces, 77, 1253–1282.
25.
LoganJ. R.BianF.BianY. (1998). Tradition and change in the urban Chinese family: The case of living arrangements. Social Forces, 76, 851–882.
PapkeL.WooldridgeJ. (1996). Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11, 619–632.
29.
PavalkoE. K. (2011). Caregiving and the life course: Connecting the personal and the public. In SetterstenR. A.AngelJ. L. (Eds.), Handbook of sociology of aging (pp. 603–616). New York, NY: Springer.
30.
PillemerK.SuitorJ. J. (2013). Who provides care? A prospective study of caregiving among adult siblings. The Gerontologist, 54, 589–598.
31.
PostonD. L.JrDuanC. C. (2000). The current and projected distribution of the elderly and eldercare in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 714–732.
32.
SalmonC. A.ShackelfordT. K.MichalskiR. L. (2012). Birth order, sex of child, and perceptions of parental favoritism. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 357–362.
33.
SerenyM. (2011). Living arrangements of older adults in China: The interplay among preferences, realities, and health. Research on Aging, 33, 172–204.
34.
ShengX.SettlesB. H. (2006). Intergenerational relationships and elderly care in China: A global perspective. Current Sociology, 54, 293–313.
35.
SilversteinM. (2006). Intergenerational family transfers in social context. Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, 6, 165–180.
36.
SilversteinM.CongZ.LiS. (2006). Intergenerational transfers and living arrangements of older people in rural China: Consequences for psychological well-being. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61, S256–S266.
37.
SilversteinM.GiarrussoR. (2010). Aging and family life: A decade review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 1039–1058.
38.
SuitorJ. J.GilliganM.PillemerK. (2013). Continuity and change in mothers’ favoritism toward offspring in adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 1229–1247.
39.
SuitorJ. J.PillemerK. (2007). Mothers’ favoritism in later life: The role of children’s birth order. Research on Aging, 29, 32–55.
40.
SunR. (2002). Old age support in contemporary urban China from both parents’ and children’s perspectives. Research on Aging, 24, 337–359.
41.
TangC.MaJ.ShiJ. (2009). Ethic and fairness of daughter’s supporting to her parents’ family: Gender study on intergenerational family relation in rural area of eastern Zhejiang province [in Chinese]. Sociological Research, 6, 18–36.
42.
ThorntonA.LinH. S. (1994). Social change and the family in Taiwan. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43.
Von HippelP. T. (2009). How to impute interactions, squares, and other transformed variables. Sociological Methodology, 39, 265–291.
44.
WakabayashiC.DonatoK. M. (2006). Does caregiving increase poverty among women in later life? Evidence from the health and retirement survey. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 47, 258–274.
45.
WatsonR. (1985). Inequality among brothers. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
46.
WhyteM. K. (2010). One country, two societies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
XieY.ZhuH. (2009). Do sons or daughters give more money to parents in urban China?Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 174–186.
48.
YanY. (2003). Private life under socialism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
49.
YanY. (2006). Girl power: Young women and the waning of patriarchy in rural north China. Ethnology, 2, 105–123.
50.
YanY. (2009). The individualization of Chinese society. Oxford, England: Berg.
51.
ZhanH.FengX.LuoB. (2008). Placing elderly parents in institutions in urban China: A reinterpretation of filial piety. Research on Aging, 30, 543–571.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
