The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) protects individuals aged 40 years and over from discrimination throughout the employment process. Using data on ADEA charges from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission from 1993 to 2010, we present labor force–adjusted charge rates demonstrating that the highest charge rates are among those in the preretirement age range, and only the rate of charges among those aged 65 years and older has not decreased. We examine characteristics of ADEA charges including the prevalence of different alleged discriminatory actions (or issues) and highlight the increasing proportion of age discrimination charges that are jointly filed with other antidiscrimination statutes. Through a regression analysis, we find that the likelihood of citing various issues differs by charging party characteristics, such as age, gender, and minority status, and on charges that cite only age discrimination as compared to those that are jointly filed. Implications of these findings for employers are discussed.
AARP Research. (2014). Staying ahead of the curve 2013: The AARP work and career study. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
AdamsS. (2004). Age discrimination legislation and the employment of older workers. Labour Economics, 11, 219–241.
3.
Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (2000).
4.
BlauF. D.KahnL. M. (2007). The gender pay gap: Have women gone as far as they can?Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 7–23. doi:10.5465/AMP.2007.24286161. Retrieved fromhttp://amp.aom.org/content/21/1/7.short
5.
BendickM.JrBrownL.WallK. (1999). No foot in the door: An experimental study of employment discrimination against older workers. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 10, 5–23.
6.
BerdahlJ. L.MooreC. (2006). Workplace harassment: Double jeopardy for minority women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 426–436. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.426
7.
BjellandM. J.BruyèreS. M.von SchraderS.HoutenvilleA. J.Ruiz-QuintanillaA.WebberD. A. (2010). Age and disability employment discrimination: Occupational rehabilitation implications. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 20, 456–471.
8.
BlackstoneA. (2012). Harassment of older adults in the workplace. In BrownellP.KellyJ. (Eds.), Ageism and mistreatment of older workers: Current reality, future solutions (pp. 31–47). The Netherlands: Springer.
9.
BraultM. W. (2012). Americans with disabilities: 2010. Current population reports, P70–131. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved fromhttp://www.census.gov/prod/2012pubs/p70-131.pdf
10.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139–168.
11.
DennyE. R. (2012). Mo’ claims, Mo’ problems: How courts ignore multiple claimants in employment discrimination litigation. Law and Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice, 30, 339–370.
12.
FeuersteinM.LuffG. M.HarringtonC. B.OlsenC. H. (2007). Pattern of workplace disputes in cancer survivors: A population study of ADA claims. Journal of Cancer Survivorship: Research and Practice, 1, 185–192. doi:10.1007/s11764-007-0027-9
13.
GoldbergC. (2007). Diversity issues for an aging workforce. In ShultzK. S.AdamsG. A. (Eds.), Aging and work in the 21st century (pp. 51–71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
LaheyJ. N. (2006). State age protection laws and the age discrimination in employment act(Working Paper No. 12048). Retrieved from National Bureau of Economic Research websitehttp://www.nber.org/papers/w12048.pdf
17.
LaheyJ. N. (2008). Age, women, and hiring: An experimental study. Journal of Human Resources, 43, 30–56. doi:10.1353/jhr.2008.0026
18.
McmullinJ. A.ShueyK. M. (2006). Ageing, disability and workplace accommodations. Ageing and Society, 26, 831.
19.
National Bureau of Economic Research. (2010, 9). US business cycle expansions and contractions. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nber.org/cycles.html
20.
NeumarkD. (2009). The age discrimination in employment act and the challenge of population aging. Research on Aging, 31, 41–68. doi:10.1177/0164027508324640
21.
NgT. W. H.FeldmanD. C. (2012). Evaluating six common stereotypes about older workers with meta-analytical data. Personnel Psychology, 65, 821–858. doi:10.1111/peps.12003
22.
PosthumaR. A.CampionM. A. (2009). Age stereotypes in the workplace: Common stereotypes, moderators, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 35, 158–188. doi:10.1177/0149206308318617
23.
QuinnJ. F. (2010). Work, retirement, and the encore career: Elders and the future of the American workforce. Generations, 34, 45–55.
24.
RoscignoV. J.MongS.ByronR.TesterG. (2007). Age discrimination, social closure and employment. Social Forces, 86, 313–334. doi:10.1353/sof.2007.0109
25.
SchwabS. J.GlissmanG. (2011). Age and disability within the scope of American discrimination law. In WienerR. L.WillbornS. L. (Eds.), Disability and aging discrimination: Perspectives in law and psychology (pp. 145–155). New York, NY: Springer.
26.
ShawL. R.ChanF.McMahonB. T. (2011). Intersectionality and disability harassment: The interactive effects of disability, race, age, and gender. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 55, 82–91. doi:10.1177/0034355211431167
27.
StainbackK.Tomaskovic-DeveyD. (2012). Documenting desegregation: Racial and gender segregation in private-sector employment since the civil rights act. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
28.
ToossiM. (2012). Labor force projections to 2020: A more slowly growing workforce. Monthly Labor Review, 135, 43–64.
29.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014, 2). Labor force statistics from the current population survey. Retrieved fromhttp://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat03.htm
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2012, 4). Unemployed older workers: Many experience challenges regaining employment and face reduced retirement security(GAO-12-445). Retrieved fromhttp://www.gao.gov/assets/600/590408.pdf
