Research reveals that older people do a significant amount of volunteer work. Moreover, a good deal of this volunteering takes place in religious institutions. The purpose of this study is to examine how social factors in the church influence the decision to volunteer. The analyses are conducted in two steps. First, data from a longitudinal nationwide survey of older people are used to show that increases in spiritual support (i.e., assistance from fellow church members that is designed to bolster religious beliefs and behaviors) are associated with increases in the frequency of volunteer work. Second, cross-sectional analyses from the same survey suggest that spiritual support is associated with volunteering in part because it promotes greater compassion. However, the magnitude of the relationship between compassion and volunteering is fairly modest.
BeckerP. E.DhingraP. H. (2001). Religious involvement and volunteering: Implications for civil society. Sociology of Religion, 62, 315–335.
2.
BergerP. L. (1967). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory. New York, NY: Doubleday.
3.
BollenK. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley.
4.
ChaikenS.WoodW.EaglyA. H. (1996). Principles of persuation. In HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 702–742). New York, NY: Guilford.
5.
ClendenningJ. (1984). The life and thought of Josiah Royce. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
6.
Corporation for National and Community Service. (2006). Volunteer growth in America: A review of trends since 1974. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nationalservice.gov
7.
CoyneJ. C.WortmanC. B.LehmanD. R. (1988). The other side of support: Emotional overinvolvement and miscarried helping. In GottliebB. H. (Ed.), Marshaling social support: Formats, processes, and effects (pp. 305–350). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
DeShonR. P. (1998). A cautionary note on measurement error correlations in structural equation models. Psychological Methods, 3, 412–423.
EndersC. C. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
11.
Fetzer Institute/National Institute on Aging Working Group. (1999). Multidimensional measurement of religiousness/spirituality for use in health research. Kalamazoo, MI: John E. Fetzer Institute.
12.
GalenL. W. (2012). Does religious belief promote prosociality? A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 876–906.
13.
GranoC.LucidiF.ZelliA.ViolaniC. (2008). Motives and determinants of volunteering in older adults: An integrated model. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 67, 305–326.
14.
HoggM. A.AbrahamsD.OttenS.HinkleS. (2004). The Social Identity perspective: Intergroup relations, self-conception, and small groups. Small Group Research, 35, 246–276.
15.
HuL.PentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
16.
HustinxL.CnaanR. A.HandyF. (2010). Navigating theories of volunteering: A hybrid map for a complex phenomenon. Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior, 40, 410–434.
17.
JohnsonK. A.OkunM. A.CohenA. B. (2013). Intrinsic religiosity and volunteering during emerging adulthood: A comparison of Mormons with Catholics and non-Catholics. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52, 842–851.
18.
KrauseN. (2002a). Church-based social support and health in old age: Exploring variations by race. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 57B, S332–S347.
19.
KrauseN. (2002b). A comprehensive strategy for developing closed-ended survey items for use in studies of older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 57B, S263–S274.
20.
KrauseN. (2008). Aging in the church: How social relationships affect health. West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.
21.
LamP. Y. (2002). As the flocks gather: How religion affects voluntary association participation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 405–422.
22.
LundbergC. D. (2010). Unifying truths of the world’s religions. New Fairfield, CT: Heavenlight Press.
23.
McFaddenS. H.KneppleA. M.ArmstrongJ. A. (2003). Length and locus of friendship influence, church members’ sense of social support, and comfort with sharing emotions. Journal of Religious Gerontology, 15, 39–55.
24.
MenardS. (1991). Longitudinal research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.
MusickM. A.WilsonJ. (2008). Volunteers: A social profile. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
26.
PilkingtonP.WindsorT. D.CrispD. A. (2012). Volunteering and subjective well-being in midlife and older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 67, 249–260.
27.
ReiseS. P.WidamanK. F.PughR. H. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 552–566.
28.
RoyceJ. (2001). The sources of religious insight. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press (Original work published1912).
29.
SantosD. (2010). Motivations of hospital volunteers. American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine, 27, 357.
30.
SonJ.WilsonJ. (2012). Using normative theory to explain the effect of religion and education on volunteering. Sociological Perspectives, 55, 473–499.
31.
SprecherS.FehrB. (2005). Compassionate love for close others and humanity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 629–651.
32.
StarkR.FinkeR. (2000). Acts of faith: Explaining the human side of religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
SteenslandB.ParkJ. Z.RegnerusM. D.RobinsonL. D.WilcoxW. B.WoodberryR. D. (2000). The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces, 79, 291–318.
34.
StephenP. R.MastersK. S. (2005). Does compassion mediate the intrinsic religion-health relationship?Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 30, 217–224.
35.
WidamanK. F. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. In CooperH. (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, volume 3 (pp. 361–389). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
