This study sought to understand the ways that adult daughters and their parents make sense of the older adult’s aging and one another’s changing roles within the context of the decision to move a parent to a care-related facility. In particular, the decision to move a parent to a care-related facility provides a context for the study of uncertainty, ambivalence, and other concerns connected with role transitions and decision-making difficulties. How older parents and adult daughters communicate about and cope with these challenges was compared. Babrow’s problematic integration theory provides a framework for this research. A qualitative study employing in-depth interviews with 44 residents at continuum-of-care facilities and 12 adult daughters of residents was conducted. Findings indicate that both parents and daughters experience significant problematic integration. However, their attempts to cope are in marked contrast to one another. These differences, along with theoretical and practical implications, are discussed further.
BabrowA. S. (1992). Communication and problematic integration: Understanding diverging probability and value, ambiguity, ambivalence, and impossibility. Communication Theory, 2, 95–130.
2.
BabrowA. S. (1995). Communication and problematic integration: Milan Kundera’s “Lost Letters” in The Book of Laughter and Forgetting. Communication Monographs, 62, 283–300.
3.
BabrowA. S. (2001). Uncertainty, value, communication, and problematic integration. Journal of Communication, 51, 553–573.
4.
BabrowA. S. (2004, November). Problematic integration theory past, present and future. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago.
5.
BabrowA. S. (2007). Problematic integration theory. In WhaleyB. B.SamterW. (Eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 181–200). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
BabrowA. S.Dutta-BergmanM. J. (2003). Constructing the uncertainties of bioterror: A study of U.S. news reporting on the anthrax attack of Fall 2001. In GrantC. B. (Ed.), Rethinking communicative interaction: New interdisciplinary horizons (pp. 295–315). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
7.
BabrowA. S.MattsonM. (2003). Theorizing about health communication. In ThompsonT.DorseyA.MillerK.ParrottR. (Eds.), Handbook of health communication (pp. 35–61). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
BirdittK. S.MillerL. M.FingermanK. L.LefkowitzE. S. (2009). Tensions in the parent and adult child relationship: Links to solidarity and ambivalence. Psychology and Aging, 24, 287–295. doi:10.1037/a0015196
CarstensenL. L. (1987). Age-related changes in social activity among the elderly. In CarstensenL. L.EdelsteinB. A. (Eds.), Handbook of clinical gerontology. New York, NY: Pergamon.
11.
CarstensenL. L. (1991). Socioemotional selectivity theory: Social activity in lifespan context. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 11, 195–217.
12.
CarstensenL. L. (1992). Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 3, 331–338.
13.
CarstensenL. L.MikelsJ. A. (2005). At the intersection of emotion and cognition: Aging and the positivity effect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 117–121.
14.
CarstensenL. L.MikelsJ. A.MatherM. (2006). Aging and the intersection of cognition, motivation and emotion. In BirrenJ.SchaieK. W. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (6th ed., pp. 343–362). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
15.
CastleN. G. (2003). Searching for and selecting a nursing facility. Medical Care Research and Review, 60, 223–247.
16.
CicirelliV. G. (1992). Family caregiving: Autonomous and paternalistic decision making. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
DaviesS.NolanM. (2003). ‘Making the best of things’: Relatives experiences of decisions about care-home entry. Ageing and Society, 23, 429–450.
18.
EckertJ. K.CarderP. C.MorganL. A.FrankowskiA. C.RothE. G. (2009). Inside assisted living: The search for home. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
19.
EisnerE. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York, NY: MacMillan.
20.
FingermanK. L. (1996). Sources of tension in the aging mother adult daughter relationship. Psychology and Aging, 11, 591–606.
21.
FingermanK. L.HayE. L. (2004). Intergenerational ambivalence in the context of the larger social network. In PillemerK.LuscherK. (Eds), Intergenerational ambivalences: New perspectives on parent–child relations in later life (pp. 133–152). Boston, MA: Elsevier.
22.
FingermanK. L.HayE. L.BirdittK. S. (2004). The best of ties, the worst of ties: Close, problematic, and ambivalent social relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 792–808.
23.
FingermanK. L.ChenP. C.HayE. L.CicyK. E.LefkowitzE. S. (2006). Ambivalent reactions in the parent and offspring relationship. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 61B, P152–P160.
24.
GillE. A.BabrowA. S. (2007). To hope or to know: Uncertainty and ambivalence in women’s magazine breast cancer articles. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35, 133–155.
25.
GillE. A.MorganM. (2011). Home sweet home: Conceptualizing and coping with the challenges of aging and the move to a care facility. Health Communication, 26, 332–342.
26.
GoldbergR. J. (2004). Home or nursing home: Making the right choices. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52, 2134–2135.
27.
GonyeaJ. G.ParisR.de Saxe ZerdenL. (2008). Adult daughters and aging mothers: The role of guilt in the experience of caregiver burden. Aging and Mental Health, 12. 559–567.
LangF. R. (2004). The filial task in midlife: Ambivalence and the quality of adult children’s relationships with their older parents. In PillemerK.LuscherK. (Eds.), Intergenerational ambivalences: New perspectives on parent-child relations in later life (pp. 183–206). Boston, MA: Elsevier.
30.
LettkeF.KleinD. M. (2004). Methodological issues in assessing ambivalences in intergenerational relations. In PillemerK.LuscherK. (Eds.), Intergenerational ambivalences: New perspectives on parent-child relations in later life (pp. 85–114). Boston, MA: Elsevier.
31.
LuscherK. (2004). Conceptualizing and uncovering intergenerational ambivalence. In PillemerK.LuscherK. (Eds.), Intergenerational ambivalences: New perspectives on parent-child relations in later life (pp. 23–62). Boston, MA: Elsevier.
32.
LuscherK.PillemerK. (1998). Intergenerational ambivalence: A new approach to the study of parent-child relations in later life. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 413–425.
33.
ManciniJ. A.BliesznerR. (1989). Aging parents and adult children: Research themes in intergenerational relations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 275–290.
34.
MatherM.CarstensenL. L. (2005). Aging and motivated cognition: The positivity effect in attention and memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 496–502.
35.
McCulloughL.WilsonN.TeasdaleT.KolpakchiA.SkellyJ. (1993). Mapping personal, familial, and professional values in long-term care decisions. The Gerontologist, 33, 324–332.
36.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
MorganM.HummertM. L. (2000). Perceptions of communicative control strategies in mother-daughter dyads across the life span. Journal of Communication, 50, 48–64.
38.
MyersF.MacDonaldC. (1996). ‘I was given options not choices’ Involving older users and carers in assessment and care planning. In BlandR. (Ed.), Developing services for older people and their families (pp. 97–111). Bristol, PA: Jessica Kingsley.
39.
NolanM.DellasegaC. (2000). ‘I really feel I’ve let him down’: Supporting family carers during long-term care placement for elders. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 321, 759–767.
40.
NolanM.GrantG.KeadyJ. (1996). Understanding family care: A multidimensional model of caring and coping. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
41.
PecchioniL. L. (1999, May). The older mother-daughter relationship: Three interaction styles. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Francisco.
42.
PecchioniL. L. (2001). Implicit decision-making in family caregiving. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 219–237.
43.
PiercyK.ChapmanJ. (2001). Adopting the caregiver role: A family legacy. Family Relations, 50, 386–393.
44.
PillemerK.SuitorJ. J. (2002). Explaining mothers’ ambivalence toward their adult children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 602–613.
45.
ReinardyJ. (1992). Relocation to a new environment: Decisional control and the move to a nursing home. Health and Social Work, 20, 31–38.
46.
ShanasE. (1980). Older people and their families: The new pioneers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 42, 9–15.
47.
SilversteinM.GiarrussoR. (2010). Aging and family life: A decade review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 1039–1058.
48.
SmelserN. (1998). The rational and the ambivalent in the social sciences. American Sociological Review, 63, 1–16.
49.
StampG. (2004). Theories of family relationships and a family relationships theoretical model. In VangelistiA. (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 1–30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51.
WillsonA. E.ShueyK. M.ElderG. H.Jr. (2003). Ambivalence in the relationship of adult children to aging parents and in-laws. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 1055–1072.
