Currently, two thirds of older women receive Social Security spouse and widow benefits, which are distributed on the basis of marital rather than employment status. But marriage rates are down, particularly among Black women. This study used June 1985, 1990, and 1995 Current Population Survey data to trace trends in marriage for women from five birth cohorts and to predict marital patterns for the latter three cohorts. The authors found that the proportion of women who will reach age 62 without 10-year marriages, and thus be ineligible for spouse and widow benefits, is increasing modestly for Whites and Hispanics but dramatically for African Americans. When women who were born in the 1960s reach age 62, 82% of Whites, 85% of Hispanics, and just 50% of Blacks will be eligible. The authors discuss alternative mechanisms for distributing benefits.
Berkowitz, Edward. 2002. “Family Benefits in Social Security: A Historical Commentary.” Pp. 19-46 in Social Security and the Family, edited by Melissa Favreault, Frank Sammartino, and C. Egene Steuerle. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
2.
Bramlett, Matthew D. and William D. Mosher. 2001. “First Marriage Dissolution, Divorce, and Remarriage: United States.”Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics, No. 323 (May 31). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
3.
Burkhauser, Richard and Greg Duncan. 1989. “Economic Risks of Gender Roles: Income Loss and Life Events Over Life Course.”Social Science Quarterly70(1): 3-23.
4.
Burkhauser, Richard and Karen Holden. 1982. A Challenge to Social Security: The Changing Roles of Women and Men in American Society. New York: Academic Press.
5.
Burkhauser, Richard and Timothy M. Smeeding. 1994. Social Security Reform: A Budget Neutral Approach to Reducing Older Women's Disproportionate Risk of Poverty (Policy Brief No. 2). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, Center for Policy Research.
6.
Boskin, Michael and Douglas Puffert. 1987. “Social Security and the American Family.” Pp. 139-159 in Tax Policy and the Economy, Vol. 1, edited by Lawrence Summas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
Butrica, Barbara A. and Howard M. Iams. 2000. “Divorced Women at Retirement: Projections of Economic Well-Being in the Near Future.”Social Securtiy Bulletin63(3): 3-12.
8.
Butrica, Barbara A. and Howard M. Iams. 2003. “The Impact of Minority Group Status on the Projected Retirement Income of Divorced Women in the Baby Boom Cohort.”Journal of Women & Aging15(2/3): 67-88.
9.
Davies, Paul S. and Melissa M. Favreault. 2004. Interactions Between Social Seucrity Reform and the Supplemental Security Income Program for the Aged (Working Paper 2004-02). Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
10.
Favreault, Melissa, Frank Sammartino, and Eugene Steuerle. 2002. “Social Security Benefits for Spouses and Survivors: Options for Chance.” Pp. 177-227 in Social Security and the Family, edited by Melissa Favreault, Frank Sammartino, and Eugene Steuerle. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
11.
Flowers, Marilyn. 1979. “Supplemental Benefits for Spouses Under Social Security: A Public Choice Explanation of the Law.”Economic Inquiry17: 125-130.
12.
Glasse, Lou, Carroll Estes, and Timothy Smeeding. 1999. “Social Security Reform and Older Women: How to Help the Most Vulnerable.”Statement for the House Subcommittee on Social Security, Committee on Ways and Means, U.S. House of Representatives. Washington, DC: Gerontological Society of America.
13.
Goldstein, Joshua R.1999. “The Leveling of Divorce in the United States.”Demography6(3): 409-414.
14.
Goldstein, Joshua R. and Catherine T. Kenney. 2001. “Marriage Delayed or Marriage Forgone? New Cohort Forecasts of First Marriage for U.S. Women.”American Sociological Review66: 506-519.
15.
Harrington Meyer, Madonna. 1996. “Making Claims as Workers or Wives: The Distribution of Social Security Benefits.”American Sociological Review61(3): 449-465.
16.
Harrington Meyer, Madonna, Douglas A. Wolf, and Christine L. Himes. 2005. “Linking Benefits to Marital Status: Race and Diminishing Access to Social Security Spouse and Widow Benefits in the U.S.”Feminist Economics11(2): 145-162.
17.
Herd, Pam. 2002. Crediting Care, Citizenship or Marriage? Gender, Race, Class and Social Security Reform. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University.
18.
Holden, Karen. 1979. “The Inequitable Distribution of OASI Benefits Among Homemakers.”The Gerontologist19: 250-256.
19.
Liao, Youlian, Richard S. Cooper, Guichan Cao, Ramon Durazo-Arvizu, Jay S. Kaufman, Amy Luke, and Daniel L. McGee. 1998. “Mortality Patterns Among Adult Hispanics: Findings From the NHIS, 1986 to 1990.”American Journal of Public Health88: 227-232.
20.
Martin, Teresa C., and Larry L. Bumpass. 1989. “Recent Trends in Marital Disruption.”Demography26: 37-51.
21.
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. 1999. The MetLife Juggling Act Study: Balancing Caregiving with Work and the Costs Involved. New York: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.
22.
Munnell, Alicia. 2004. “Why Are So Many Older Women Poor?”Just the Facts on Retirement IssuesNo. 10. Boston: Boston College Center for Retirement Research.
23.
Myers, Robert. 1982. “Incremental Change in Social Security Needed to Result in Equal and Fair Treatment of Men and Women.” Pp. 235-245 in A Challenge to Social Security: The Changing Roles of Women and Men in American Society, edited by Richard Burkhauser and Karen Holden. New York: Academic Press.
24.
Padavic, Irene and Barbara Reskin. 2002. Women and Men at Work. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
25.
Quadagno, Jill S.2001. Aging and the Life Course. 2nd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.
26.
Ruggles, Steven. 1997. “The Rise of Divorce and Separation in the United States, 1880-1990.”Demography34(4): 455-466.
27.
Schoen, Robert and Robin Weinick. 1993. “The Slowing Metabolism of Marriage: Figures From the 1988 U.S. Marital Status Life Tables.”Demography30: 737-746.
28.
Shaw, Lois, Diana Zuckerman, and Heidi Hartmann. 1998. The Impact of Social Security Reform on Women. Washington, DC: Institute for Women's Policy Research.
29.
Social Security Administration. 2002. “Annual Statistical Supplement.”Social Security Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
30.
U.S. Census Bureau. 1973. “Table 203: Marital Status, Presence of Spouse, and Whether Married More Than Once, by Race, Sex, and Age: 1970.”Census of the Population: 1970: Detailed Characteristics: United States Summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
31.
U.S. Census Bureau. 1984. “Table 264: Marital Status, Presence of Spouse, and Marital History for Persons 15 Years and Over, by Race, Spanish Origin, Sex, and Age: 1980.”Census of Population: 1980: Detailed Characteristics: United States Summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
32.
U.S. Census Bureau. 1992. “Table 34: Persons 15 Years and Over by Marital Status, Age, Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin.”Census of Population: 1990: General Population Characteristics: United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
33.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2000. “Table A1: Marital Status of People 15 Years and Over, by Age, Sex, Personal Earnings, Race and Hispanic Origin/March 1, 2000.”Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
34.
U.S. House of Representatives. 2000. Committee on Ways and Means Green Book. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
35.
Walzer, Michael. 1988. “Socializing the Welfare State.” Pp. 13-26 in Democracy and the Welfare State, edited by A. Gutmann. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
Wasow, Bernard. 2004. A New Minimum Benefit for Social Security. New York: The Century Foundation.
37.
Wolf, Douglas A.1986. “Simulation Methods for Analyzing Continuous-Time Event-History Models.” Pp. 283-308 in Sociological Methodology 1986, edited by N. B. Tuma. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
