Class and gender in the hegemonic process: class differences in women's perceptions of television realism and identification with television characters
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 1989
Class and gender in the hegemonic process: class differences in women's perceptions of television realism and identification with television characters
Bernstein, Basil (1958) `Some Sociological Determinants of Perception', British Journal of SociologyIX(2): 159-74.
2.
Bernstein, Basil (1966) `Elaborated and Restricted Codes: Their Social Origins and Some Consequences' in A.G. Smith (ed.) Common Culture.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. (First published 1964.)
3.
Eisenstein, Zillah (1981) The Radical Future of Liberal Feminism.New York: Longman.
4.
Eisenstein, Zillah (1984) Feminism and Sexual Inequality: Crisis in Liberal America.New York: Monthly Review.
5.
Friedan, Betty (1981) The Second Stage.New York: Summit Books.
6.
Hacker, Helen (1951) `Women as a Minority Group', Social Forces30:60-9.
7.
Hartmann, Heidi and Amy Bridges (1979) `The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: towards a more progressive union', Capital and Class, Summer.
8.
Hewlett, Sylvia Ann (1986) A Lesser Life: The Myth of Women's Liberation in America.New York: William Morrow.
9.
Hyman, Herbert (1953) `The Value Systems of Different Classes', in R. Bendix and S.M. Lipset (eds) Class, Status and Power, pp. 426-42. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press.
10.
Lewis, Oscar (1959) Five Families: Mexican Case Studies in the Culture of Poverty.New York: Basic Books.
11.
Lewis, Oscar (1966) La Vida: A Puerto Rican Family in the Culture of Poverty — San Juan and New York.New York: Random House.
12.
Morley, David (1986) Family Television.London: Comedia.
13.
Press, Andrea (1987) `Deconstructing the Audience: Class Differences in Women's Identification with Television Narrative and Characters'. Ph.D. thesis, Sociology Department, University of California at Berkeley.
14.
Schatzman, Leonard and Anselm Strauss (1955) `Social Class and Modes of Communication', American Journal of SociologyLX(4): 329-38.