This article examines how digital authenticity is constructed through the Portable Document Format (PDF), namely the ways in which format becomes a site where digital memory is fabricated, managed and selectively obscured. By interrogating the visible (marginalia, page skews, residue) and invisible (OCR text files, metadata) features, I show how these paratextual elements contribute to production of authenticity across digital documents. I articulate this process as transversal authenticity, in which authority and legitimacy emerge from the interaction of historical print conventions, digital infrastructures and affordances and sociocultural narratives. Drawing on approaches from media studies, including format studies and media archeology, this article analyzes the technical (scanning techniques, encoding processes) alongside the social (historical narratives, cultural discourse). I argue that transversal authenticity matters, not just in the verification of PDFs but in the determination of cultural and legal ontologies, meanings and affects and in the material and discursive epistemological consequences. This extends to contemporary contexts where formats like the PDF are increasingly used not just in archives, but also as epistemic foundations within computational knowledge infrastructures of LLMs.
AgarwalDNaamanMVashisthaA (2025) AI Suggestions homogenize writing toward western styles and diminish cultural nuances. In: Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Yokohama Japan, 26 April 2025, pp.1–21. ACM. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3706598.3713564 (accessed 22 September 2025).
7.
AndersonBRShahJHKreminskiM (2024) Homogenization effects of large language models on human creative ideation. In: Creativity and Cognition, Chicago IL USA, 23 June 2024, pp. 413–425. ACM. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3635636.3656204 (accessed 22 September 2025).
8.
Banet-WeiserS (2012) Authentic TM: Politics and Ambivalence in a Brand Culture. New York University Press.
9.
BauerDB (2024) 3D media in the transversal era. Afterimage51(1): 47–69.
10.
BenjaminW (1968) The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In: ArendtH (ed.) Illuminations. Schocken, pp.217–251.
11.
BenoitE (2017) #MPLP Part 1: Comparing domain expert and novice social tags in a minimally processed digital archives. American Archivist80(2): 407–438.
12.
BogaardTHollinkLWielemakerJ, et al. (2019) Metadata categorization for identifying search patterns in a digital library. Journal of Documentation75(2): 270–286.
13.
BollmerG (2023) The Affect Lab: The History and Limits of Measuring Emotion. University of Minnesota Press.
14.
BrachaO (2008) The ideology of authorship revisited: Authors, markets, and liberal values in early American copyright. Yale Law Journal118(2): 186.
BuchananK (2016) Indigenous Rights in New Zealand: Legislation, Litigation, and Protest. In Custodia Legis. Available at: //blogs.loc.gov/law/2016/11/indigenous-rights-in-new-zealand-legislation-litigation-and-protest (accessed 31 October 2023).
18.
BurchardtJ (2023) Are searches in OCR-generated archives trustworthy?: An analysis of digital newspaper archives. Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte/Economic History Yearbook64(1): 31–54.
CarlsonJBryanTDellM (2023) Efficient OCR for building a diverse digital history. arXiv. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02737 (accessed 11 June 2024).
HertzGParikkaJ (2010) CTheory Interview: Archaeologies of Media Art. CTheory. Epub ahead of print 2010.
37.
HoltermannCRöttgerPDillT, et al. (2024) Evaluating the elementary multilingual capabilities of large language models with MultiQ. arXiv. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.03814 (accessed 3 November 2025).
JancovicM (2019) Fold, format, fault: On reformatting and loss. In: JancovicMVolmarASchneiderA (eds) Format Matters: Standards, Practices, and Politics in Media Cultures. meson press, pp.195–217. https://doi.org/10.14619/1556
40.
KaminskaA (2019) Don’t copy that: Security printing and the making of high-tech paper. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies25(4): 590–606.
41.
KirschenbaumMG (2016) Track Changes: A Literary History of Word Processing. Harvard University Press.
42.
KittlerFA (1999) Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Stanford University Press.
43.
KoopmanC (2022) The political theory of data: Institutions, algorithms, & formats in racial redlining. Political Theory50(2): 337–361.
OgdenJSummersEWalkerS (2024) Know(ing) infrastructure: The Wayback Machine as object and instrument of digital research. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies30(1): 167–189.
53.
ÖzyeşilpınarE (2024) Maps as rhetorical tools of colonial power and alternative cartographies: The Americas’ cartographic invention. Rhetoric Review43(2): 116–131.
54.
ParikkaJ (2015) A Geology of Media. University of Minnesota Press.
PugliaSTReedJRhodesE, et al. (2005) Technical Guidelines for Digitizing Archival Materials for Electronic Access: Creation of Production Master Files. Digital Library Federation.
Rose-RedwoodRBlu BarndNLucchesiAH, et al. (2020) Decolonizing the map: Recentering indigenous mappings. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization55(3): 151–162.
SchantzH (1982) The History of OCR, Optical Character Recognition. Recognition Technologies Users Ass.
61.
ScheweJ (2004) About Metadata. September. Adobe Systems.
62.
SellenAJHarperR (2003) The Myth of the Paperless Office. MIT Press.
63.
SinhaRRekhaBS (2025) Digitization of document and information extraction using OCR. arXiv. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11156 (accessed 9 March 2026).
64.
StarSL (2016) Misplaced concretism and concrete situations: Feminism, method, and information technology. In: BowkerGCTimmermansSClarkeA, et al. (eds) Boundary Objects and Beyond: Working With Leigh Star. MIT Press, pp.168–195.
65.
SteensenS (2019) Journalism’s epistemic crisis and its solution: Disinformation, datafication and source criticism. Journalism20(1): 185–189.
66.
SterneJ (2012) MP3: The Meaning of a Format. Duke University Press.
67.
StrauvenW (2021) Touchscreen Archaeology: Tracing Histories of Hands-On Media Practices. Meson Press.
68.
TanselleGT (1971) The Bibliographical Description of Paper. Studies in Bibliography 24. Bibliographical Society of the University of Virginia, pp.27–67.
WangHPanCGuoX, et al. (2021) From object detection to text detection and recognition: A brief evolution history of optical character recognition. WIREs Computational Statistics13(5): e1547.
WarnockJEGeschkeC (2019) Founding and growing Adobe Systems, Inc. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing41(3): 24–34.
77.
WershlerDEmersonLParikkaJ (2022) The Lab Book: Situated Practices in Media Studies. University of Minnesota Press.
78.
Wershler-HenryDS (2007) The Iron Whim: A Fragmented History of Typewriting. Cornell University Press.
79.
ZborayRJZborayMS (2013) Print Culture. In: SimonsonPPeckJCraigRT, et al. (eds) The Handbook of Communication History. International Communication Association Handbook. Routledge, pp.181–195.
80.
ZipperB (2001) Warnock on PDF: Its Past, Present and Future. The Seybold Report. Seybold Publications and Seminars.
