This study takes Li Ziqi’s YouTube videos as a central case to explore how Li Ziqi reconstructs images of digital pastoral through performative strategies. Employing multimodal critical discourse analysis, the study examines three key dimensions: environmental narrative, cultural nostalgia, and commodified rurality. The global emotional resonance of the digital pastoral lies in its aestheticized and algorithmically curated recoding of nature, tradition, and the rural into consumable spectacles. Between media esthetics and ecological longing, natural landscapes are affectively orchestrated into visual narratives of healing and slow living, reflecting platforms’ capacity to capture emotional responses. Between cultural memory and diasporic fantasy, nostalgia is translated, visualized, and globalized as a cross-contextual yearnings. And between the tensions of authenticity and performance, the viewing value of rural imagery is continuously amplified by platform capitalism, while risking the erasure of underlying issues such as social inequality and gender imbalance. Li Ziqi’s videos thus constitute a digital pastoral, a product of modern anxieties, cultural identification, and platform-driven capital, illuminating the cultural negotiations of nature, memory, and rurality in the digital age.
BoymS (2001) The Future of Nostalgia. Basic books.
2.
ButlerJ (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.
3.
ChengSYuG (2022) Pleasure and well-being: Constructing a “direct express” model in cross-cultural communication—An analysis based on comments on Li Ziqi’s short videos. Journalism Research119(5): 36–49.
4.
ChenHWangMZhangZ (2022) Research on rural landscape preference based on TikTok short video content and user comments. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health19(16): 10115.
5.
ChenPPunN (2025) ‘Re-coupling site’ of social media and the workplace in digital nomadism: Chinese female workers’ self-produced vlogs with class and gender connotations. Information Communication & Society28(3): 435–451.
De FinaAKohJ (2024) Vlogger, storyteller or character? Chronotopic identity shifts and multimodal resources in COVID-19 vlogs. Discourse Context & Media59: 100788.
8.
DuffyB (2015) Amateur, autonomous, and collaborative: Myths of aspiring female cultural producers in Web 2.0. Critical Studies in Media Communication32(1): 48–64.
9.
GoffmanE (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor Books.
10.
HalfacreeK (2010) Reading rural consumption practices for difference: Bolt-holes, castles and life-rafts. Culture Unbound2(2): 241–263.
11.
HortonJ (2008) Producing postman pat: The popular cultural construction of idyllic rurality. Journal of Rural Studies24(4): 389–398.
12.
HuberBLepeniesRQuesada BaenaL, et al. (2022) Beyond individualized responsibility attributions? How eco influencers communicate sustainability on TikTok. Environmental Communication16(6): 713–722.
13.
HuY (2024) “O ever youthful, O ever weeping”: Exploring youth empowerment through platform-dependent creative labor in China. International Journal of Communication18: 1225–1245.
14.
JackaT (ed.) (2006) Rural Women in Urban China: Gender, Migration, and Social Change, 1st edn. Routledge.
15.
LiangL (2022) Consuming the pastoral desire: Li Ziqi, food vlogging and the structure of feeling in the era of microcelebrity. Global Storytelling: Journal of Digital and Moving Images1(2): 7–39. DOI: 10.3998/gs.1020
16.
LiH (2020) From disenchantment to reenchantment: Rural microcelebrities, short video, and the spectacleization of the rural lifescape on Chinese social media. International Journal of Communication14: 3769–3787.
17.
LiMTanCKYangY (2020) Shehui Ren: Cultural production and rural youths’ use of the Kuaishou video-sharing app in eastern China. Information Communication & Society23(10): 1499–1514.
18.
LinJde KloetJ (2019) Platformization of the unlikely creative class: Kuaishou and Chinese digital cultural production. Social Media + Society5(4): 2056305119883430.
19.
LinY (2024) Blame and responsibility assignments in fast fashion-triggered environmental injustice: A case study of eco-documentaries. Environmental Communication18(6): 780–800.
20.
LiuDFanG (2025) Digital duality: Negotiating tradition, modernity, and identity among rural housewife Douyin creators in China. Information Communication & Society. 1–18. DOI: 10.1080/1369118x.2025.2496903
21.
LiuZ (2020) Modernity rebellion and pastoral imagination in the fourth consumption era: An analysis of Li Ziqi’s popularity overseas. Modern Communication42(9): 60–67.
22.
MachinD (2013) What is multimodal critical discourse studies?Critical Discourse Studies10(4): 347–355.
23.
MachinD (2016) The need for a social and affordance-driven multimodal critical discourse studies. Discourse & Society27(3): 322–334.
24.
MarinoS (2024) Refugees’ storytelling strategies on digital media platforms: How the Russia–Ukraine war unfolded on TikTok. Social Media + Society10(3): 20563051241279248.
25.
MarwickABoydD (2011) To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies17(2): 139–158.
26.
MaS (2023) The farmer, the influencer, and the labors of rural self-media. Comparative Literature Studies60(3): 519–540.
27.
NayakaSVemireddyVKRDwivediPS (2025) From local to global: Village YouTubers and rural creator cultures in South India. International Journal of Cultural Studies28(1): 185–203.
28.
NieborgDBPoellT (2018) The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society20(11): 4275–4292.
29.
OregliaEQiuJBuW, et al. (2015) Studying the sent-down Internet: Roundtable on research methods. Chinese Journal of Communication8: 7–17.
30.
PeckA (2020) When paper goes viral: Handmade signs as vernacular materiality in digital space. International Journal of Communication14: 626–648.
31.
PengBLiuZZhangB, et al. (2018) Idyll or nightmare: What does rurality mean for farmers in a Chinese village undergoing commercialization?Inter-Asia Cultural Studies19(2): 234–251.
32.
SchaeferKEdwardsDMillingJ (2017) Performing Moretonhampstead: Rurality, participation and cultural value. Cultural Trends26(1): 47–57.
33.
SchellewaldA (2023) Understanding the popularity and affordances of TikTok through user experiences. Media Culture & Society45(8): 1568–1582.
ShucksmithM (2018) Re-imagining the rural: From rural idyll to good countryside. Journal of Rural Studies59: 163–172.
36.
SuetzlW (2022) “Here is the exceptional:” Social media sharing and unavailable everydayness. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies19(2): 180–196.
37.
SutherlandLA (2020) Virtualizing the ‘good life’: Reworking narratives of agrarianism and the rural idyll in a computer game. Agriculture and Human Values37(4): 1155–1173.
38.
SyvertsenTEnliG (2020) Digital detox: Media resistance and the promise of authenticity. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies26(5-6): 1269–1283.
39.
Van DijckJ (2013) The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford University Press.
40.
WangY (2023) Rural lifestyles and life politics: Reimagining modernity in the development of a future village in China. Rural Sociology88(2): 337–361.
41.
WangYSandnerJ (2019) Like a “Frog in a well”? An ethnographic study of Chinese rural women’s social media practices through the WeChat platform. Chinese Journal of Communication12(3): 324–339.
42.
WangYWangHFengD( (2023) Aesthetics, technology, and social harmony: Constructing a “Green China” image through eco-documentaries. Environmental Communication17(6): 671–687.
43.
WelserHTKhanMLDickardM (2019) Digital remediation: Social support and online learning communities can help offset rural digital inequality. Information Communication & Society22(5): 717–723.
44.
WilliamsR (1975) The Country and the City. Oxford University Press.
45.
XiaHWengJZhangJZ, et al. (2022) Rural E-Commerce model with attention mechanism: Role of Li Ziqi’s short videos from the perspective of heterogeneous knowledge management. Journal of Global Information Technology Management25(2): 118–136.
XueXCaoK (2025) Performing the self in contemporary rural China: Voice from a villager. Cultural Trends34(2): 178–195.
48.
XuMZhangYZhanN (2025) Evolving gender roles and intergenerational connections: The role of short videos in shaping gender perceptions among rural Chinese women. Feminist Media Studies. 1–17. DOI: 10.1080/14680777.2025.2512227
49.
YangWLuoQ (2024) Geographical imaginations of China constructed by overseas audiences in the context of social media: A case study of YouTube viewers of Li Ziqi’s short videos. Human Geography39(1): 8–16.
50.
YangX (2022) Aestheticizing labor: The construction of the “Good China Story” in Li Ziqi’s videos. Chinese Literature and Thought Today53(3–4): 30–37.
51.
ZhaoL (2024) Selling rural China: The construction and commodification of rurality in Chinese promotional livestreaming. Media Culture & Society46(3): 481–499.
52.
ZhuXLiXGongJ, et al. (2022) Technology empowerment: A path to poverty alleviation for Chinese women from the perspective of development communication. Telecommunications Policy46(6): 102328.
53.
ZouS (2023) Curating a scopic contact zone: Short video, rural performativity, and the mediatization of socio-spatial order in China. Television & New Media24(4): 452–470.
