As mobile media is expanding its roots in rural spheres of the Global South, and that too among girls and women, concerns related to their engagement with digital technologies are also emerging. These concerns are emerging owing to the belief that women are not capable enough to handle digital technologies and may fall prey to untoward and harmful activities. This study tries to understand if and how mothers in rural households become gatekeepers of everyday digital practices of young girls in the global south through in-depth interviews with girls and their mothers living in villages in India. Mothers are found to be reinforcing the patriarchal norms in the mobile phone usage of their daughters and hence, further the concept of patriarchy in the online sphere. This enforcement might emerge as an important factor in gender digital divide in the Global South.
AbrahamK (2019) Persisting Patriarchy: Intersectionalities, Negotiations, Subversions. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, p.241.
2.
AghaN (2021) Kinship, Patriarchal Structure and Women’s Bargaining With Patriarchy in Rural Sindh. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
3.
AhmedSIZaberMHMorshedMB, et al (2015) Suhrid: A collaborative mobile phone interface for low literate people. In: Proceedings of the 2015 annual symposium on computing for development, London, 1–2 December 2015, pp.95–103. New York, NY: ACM.
4.
AroraP (2019a) General data protection regulation: A global standard? Privacy futures, digital activism, and surveillance cultures in the Global South. Surveillance &Society17(5): 717–725.
5.
AroraP (2019b) The Next Billion Users: Digital Life Beyond the West. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
AroraPScheiberL (2017) Slumdog romance: Facebook love and digital privacy at the margins. Media, Culture & Society39(3): 408–422.
7.
BarboniGFieldEPandeR, et al (2018) A tough call: Understanding barriers to and impacts of women’s mobile phone adoption in India. Report, Harvard Kennedy School-Evidence for Policy Design. Available at: https://epod.cid.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/2018-10/A_Tough_Call.pdf (accessed 10 May 2023).
8.
BardiniTHorvathAT (1995) The social construction of the personal computer user. Journal of Communication45(3): 40–65.
9.
BeauvoirS (1974) The Second Sex: The Classic Manifesto of the Liberated Woman (trans and ed HMParshley). New York: Vintage Books.
10.
BhallamudiI (2022) Daughters, devices and doorkeeping: How gender and class shape adolescent mobile phone access in Mumbai, India. Information, Communication & Society25(6): 851–867.
11.
BhatiaKVAroraPPathak-ShelatM (2021) Good girls don’t go online: Unpacking the quotidian playful resilience influencing girls’ social and digital engagements. International Journal of Communication15: 19.
12.
BhatiaKVPathak-ShelatM (2019) Media experiences in community-driven rural areas: Exploring children’s media cultures in rural Gujarat, India. Journal of Children and Media13(3): 260–275.
13.
BiswasMAnwarMSahaM, et al (2022) The world is in my hand now: Smartphones for empowering rural women in developing countries. In: Proceedings of the 2022 international conference on information and communication technologies and development, Seattle, WA, 27–29 June 2022, pp.1–11. New York, NY: ACM.
14.
BlumbergRL (1988) Income under female versus male control: Hypotheses from a theory of gender stratification and data from the third world. Journal of Family Issues9(1): 51–84.
15.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
16.
BurrellJ (2010) Evaluating shared access: Social equality and the circulation of mobile phones in rural Uganda. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication15(2): 230–250.
17.
CanoTHofmeisterH (2022) The intergenerational transmission of gender: Paternal influences on children’s gender attitudes. Journal of Marriage and Family85(1): 193–214.
ChaudhuriSMorashMYinglingJ (2014) Marriage migration, patriarchal bargains, and wife abuse: A study of South Asian women. Violence Against Women20(2): 141–161.
20.
DevadasV (2022) Gendered technologies: Youth, gender and mobile phones in Chennai City. Indian Journal of Gender Studies29(1): 55–75.
21.
D’LimaTSolotaroffJLPandeRP (2020) For the sake of family and tradition: Honor killings in India and Pakistan. ANTYAJAA: Indian Journal of Women and Social Change5(1): 22–39.
22.
DoronA (2012) Mobile persons: Mobile phones, gender and the self in North India. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology13(5): 414–433.
23.
Food and Agriculture Organization (2023) The Status of Women in Agrifood Systems. Rome, Italy: FAO.
GormeraWCOrekuGS (2020) Mobile devices in supporting members’ Participation to Village community Bank: The design thinking approach. Zambia Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Journal2020: 6–15.
30.
GurumurthyAChamiN (2018) Digital India Through a Gender Lens. New Delhi: Heinrich Bohl Stiftung.
31.
HadiA (2019) Patriarchy and gender-based violence in Pakistan. European Journal of Social Science Education and Research6(1): 113–125.
32.
HayesBEConnollyEJWangX, et al (2022) Chinese police cadets’ attitudes toward domestic violence: A pretest/posttest design. Crime & Delinquency68(2): 232–252.
33.
IbtasamSRazaqLAyubM, et al (2019) “My cousin bought the phone for me. I never go to mobile shops.” The role of family in women’s technological inclusion in Islamic culture. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction3: 1–33.
34.
JensonJde CastellS (2010) Gender, simulation, and gaming: Research review and redirections. Simulation & Gaming41(1): 51–71.
35.
KandiyotiD (1988) Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender & Society2(3): 274–290.
36.
KapoorS (2013) Negotiations with patriarchy: Gender and childhood in India. In: ChaudharyNAnandalakshmySValsinerJ (eds) Cultural Realities of Being. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.49–68.
37.
KhanalKSenR (2020) The dowry gift in South Asia: An institution on the intersection of market and patriarchy. Journal of Economic Issues54(2): 356–362.
38.
LinCA (1998) Exploring personal computer adoption dynamics. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media42(1): 95–112.
39.
MandelbaumDG (1988) Women’s Seclusion and Men’s Honor: Sex Roles in North India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
40.
MasikaRBailurS (2015) Negotiating women’s agency through ICTs: A comparative study of Uganda and India. Gender, Technology and Development19(1): 43–69.
MitraZ (ed.) (2020) The Concept of Motherhood in India: Myths, Theories and Realities. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
44.
MittalS (2016) Role of mobile Phone enabled climate information services in gender-inclusive agriculture. Gender, Technology and Development20(2): 200–217.
45.
NainarV (2013) Patriarchy in South Asia–structures and relations. Analyse and Kritik, June. SSRN.
46.
NishaZ (2023) Woman, mother, and the other: Unraveling the matrix of feminine self. Social Development Issues45(2): 4.
47.
OregliaEKitnerKR (2013). The “consumption junction” of ICT in emerging markets: An ethnography of middlemen. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference2013(1): 172–185.
48.
PotnisD (2016) Culture’s consequences: Economic barriers to owning mobile phones experienced by women in India. Telematics and Informatics33(2): 356–369.
RekhaPDon BoscoSVan EerdM, et al (2024) A study on mobile phone technology adoption & usage among urban poor women in resettlement sites. Social Media+ Society10(1): 20563051241237271.
51.
SalterM (2016) Privates in the online public: Sex(ting) and reputation on social media. New Media & Society18(11): 2723–2739.
52.
SambasivanNCutrellEToyamaK, et al (2010) Intermediated technology use in developing communities. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA, 10–15 April 2010, pp.2583–2592. New York, NY: ACM.
53.
ScottKShindeAUmmerO, et al (2021) Freedom within a cage: How patriarchal gender norms limit women’s use of mobile phones in rural central India. BMJ Global Health6(5): e005596.
54.
SharmaP (2014) Oligarchic patriarchal political culture of women participation in South Asia: With special reference to India, Bangladesh, Pakistan. In: Paper presented at World Congress 2014, IPSA, Montreal, Canada.
55.
ShijithVPSekherTV (2017) ‘Unwanted’ is my name: Culture, patriarchy and gender bias surrounding the Nakusa girls of Maharashtra. Sociological Bulletin66(1): 58–74
56.
SrinivasanR (2018) Whose Global Village? Rethinking How Technology Shapes Our World. New York: NYU Press.
57.
TenhunenS (2019) Mobile media, gender, and power in rural India. Human Technology15(2): 181–201.
58.
ThompsonRLHigginsCAHowellJM (1991) Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly15: 125–143.
WycheSOlsonJ (2018) Gender, mobile, and mobile internet Kenyan women’s rural realities, mobile internet access, and “Africa rising.”Information Technologies & International Development, 14: 15.
