Contesting the intermediary power: How Chinese MCNs interact with platforms,creators,and advertisers

Abstract

China currently has the largest Multi-Channel Networks (MCN) market in the world and developed a multi-layered ecosystem, which presents unique insights into our understanding of platforms as infrastructures. Through 18 semi-structured interviews and the walkthrough method, we found that Chinese MCNs can be divided into the following categories: (1) Live-streaming guilds, (2) E-commerce MCNs, (3) Agency MCNs, and (4) Old media MCNs. We also found that Chinese content platforms have not fully monopolized the intermediary power because they rely on Chinese MCNs to take on the risks of professional content production. In response, the intermediary risks of MCNs are also transferred to creators who work for MCNs. MCNs can help creators to game the algorithm and monetize their content, but can also exploit creators and leave them unprotected. The ambiguous roles played by Chinese MCNs point to an uncertain future for content platforms’ infrastructuralization at large.

Keywords

Chineseness as method infrastructure intermediary MCN platform economy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

21st Economy (2020) Uncovering the capital pushers behind the wanghongs: A chart to see the capital mapping of the head MCN organizations. Available at: https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1663738213893719361&wfr=spider&for=pc (accessed 31 July 2023).

Andrejevic

(2009) Exploiting YouTube: Contradictions of user-generated labor. In: Snickars

Vonderau

(eds) The YouTube Reader. Stockholm: National Library of Sweden, pp.406–423.

Arriagada

Concha

(2020) Cultural intermediaries in the making of branded music events: Digital cultural capital in tension. Journal of Cultural Economy 13(1): 42–53.

Bencivenga

Smith

(1991) Financial intermediation and endogenous growth. The Review of Economic Studies 58(2): 195–209.

Bishop

(2020) Algorithmic experts: Selling algorithmic lore on YouTube. Social Media + Society. Epub ahead of print 21 January 2020. DOI: 10.1177/2056305119897323.

Bourdieu

(2018) Distinction a social critique of the judgement of taste. In: Grusky

(ed.) Inequality Classic Readings in Race, Class, and Gender. London: Routledge, pp.287–318.

Bowen

(2009) Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2): 27–40.

Boyd

Prescott

(1986) Financial intermediary-coalitions. Journal of Economic Theory 38(2): 211–232.

Callon

(1998) Introduction: The embeddedness of economic markets in economics. The Sociological Review 46(1_suppl): 1–57.

10.

Chen

(2021) Digital gifting in personal brand communities of live-streaming: Fostering viewer–streamer–viewer parasocial relationships. Journal of Marketing Communications 27(8): 865–880.

11.

Chen

Qiu

(2019) Digital utility: Datafication, regulation, labor, and DiDi’s platformization of urban transport in China. Chinese Journal of Communication 12(3): 274–289.

12.

Chen

Kaye

VDB

Zeng

(2021) # PositiveEnergy Douyin: Constructing “playful patriotism” in a Chinese short-video application. Chinese Journal of Communication 14(1): 97–117.

13.

Chen

Tian

Zhao

(2020) The literature review of platform economy. Scientific Programming 2020: 8877128.

14.

China Net (2023) Latest Ranking of Top 10 MCNs in China for 2023. Available at: https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1768025739243059612&wfr=spider&for=pc (accessed 31 July 2023).

15.

Craig

Lin

Cunningham

(2021) Wanghong as Social Media Entertainment in China. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

16.

Cunningham

Craig

Silver

(2016) YouTube, multichannel networks and the accelerated evolution of the new screen ecology. Convergence 22(4): 376–391.

17.

Jin

(2012) The institutionalization of YouTube: From user-generated content to professionally generated Content. Media, Culture & Society 34(1): 53–67.

18.

(2023) Anchors fleeing 618: Last year earned 30,000 per month, this year took a pay cut and left the company. Available at: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/lkbCre5kWkgHVWxdVarhcQ (accessed 31 July 2023).

19.

Jullien

(2012). Two-side B to B Platforms. In: Peitz

Waldfogel

(eds) The Oxford Handbook of the Digital Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.161–185.

20.

Kenney

Zysman

(2016) The rise of the platform economy. Issues in Science and Technology 32(3): 61–69.

21.

Kenney

Zysman

(2020) The platform economy: Restructuring the space of capitalist accumulation. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 13(1): 55–7.

22.

Leng

Ding

(2023) What do Chinese anchors look for when flocking to Southeast Asia? Available at: https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1771441278813434509&wfr=spider&for=pc (accessed 31 July 2023).

23.

Liang

(2022) The end of social media? How data attraction model in the algorithmic media reshapes the attention economy. Media, Culture & Society 44(6): 1110–1131.

24.

Light

Burgess

Duguay

(2018) The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society 20(3): 881–900.

25.

Lin

de Kloet

(2019) Platformization of the unlikely creative class: Kuaishou and Chinese digital cultural production. Social Media+ Society 5(4):1–11.

26.

Liu

Tan

Yang

, et al. (2021) Zhibo gonghui: China’s ‘live-streaming guilds’ of manipulation experts. Information, Communication & Society 26(6): 1–16.

27.

Lobato

(2016) The cultural logic of digital intermediaries: YouTube multichannel networks. Convergence 22(4): 348-360.

28.

Montalban

Frigant

Jullien

(2019) Platform economy as a new form of capitalism: A Régulationist research programme. Cambridge Journal of Economic 43(4): 805–824.

29.

Newwrank (2020) The 2020 Annual report of content industry. Available at: https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1655059852548173316&wfr=spider&for=pc (accessed 31 July 2023).

30.

Nian

(2022) More than MCNs, TikTok’s gold rush lies in “globalized brands”. Available at: https://www.sohu.com/a/539053600_116132 (accessed 31 July 2023).

31.

Nieborg

Poell

(2018) The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society 20(11): 4275–4292.

32.

Nieborg

Poell

van Dijck

(2022) Platforms and platformization. In: Flew

Holt

Thomas

(eds) The SAGE Handbook of the Digital Media Economy. London: Sage, pp.29–49.

33.

Nielsen

Ganter

(2018) Dealing with digital intermediaries: A case study of the relations between publishers and platforms. New Media & Society 20(4): 1600–1617.

34.

Nixon

Gay

(2002) Who needs cultural intermediaries? Cultural Studies 16(4): 495–500.

35.

Nocke

Peitz

Stahl

(2007) Platform ownership. Journal of the European Economic Association 5(6): 1130–1160.

36.

O’Reilly

(2005) What is web 2.0? Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Available at: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html (accessed 31 July 2023).

37.

Ørmen

Gregersen

(2023) Towards the engagement economy: Interconnected processes of commodification on YouTube. Media, Culture & Society 45(2): 225–245.

38.

Plantin

de Seta

(2019) WeChat as infrastructure: The techno-nationalist shaping of Chinese digital platforms. Chinese Journal of Communication 12(3): 257–273.

39.

Plantin

Lagoze

Edwards

, et al. (2018). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society 20(1): 293–310.

40.

Plantin

Punathambekar

(2019) Digital media infrastructures: Pipes, platforms, and politics. Media, Culture & Society 41(2): 163–174.

41.

Poell

(2020) Three challenges for media studies in the age of platforms. Television & New Media 21(6): 650–657.

42.

Prey

Esteve Del Valle

Zwerwer

(2022) Platform pop: Disentangling Spotify’s intermediary role in the music industry. Information, Communication & Society 25(1): 74–92.

43.

Schwemmer

Ziewiecki

(2018) Social media sellout: The increasing role of product promotion on YouTube. Social Media+ Society. Epub ahead of print 14 August 2018. DOI: 10.1177/2056305118786720

44.

Sharma

(2004) An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review 17(1): 1–36.

45.

Kaye

(2023) Borderline practices on Douyin/TikTok: Content transfer and algorithmic manipulation. Media, Culture & Society 45(8): 1534–1549.

46.

van Dijck

Nieborg

Poell

(2019) Reframing platform power. Internet Policy Review 8(2): 1–18.

47.

Vonderau

(2016) The video bubble: Multichannel networks and the transformation of YouTube. Convergence 22(4): 361–375.

48.

Wang

Lobato

(2019) Chinese video streaming services in the context of global platform studies. Chinese Journal of Communication 12(3): 356–371.

49.

Zhang

(2023) Chineseness as method. Global Media & China 8(4): 514–518.

50.

Zhang

Chen

(2020) Traffic media: How algorithmic imaginations and practices change content production. Chinese Journal of Communication 14(1): 58–74.

51.

Zhang

(2021) Infrastructuralization of Tik Tok: Transformation, power relationships, and platformization of video entertainment in China. Media, Culture & Society 43(2): 219–236.