Sharenting – a new term emerged over the past 10 years – refers to the practice of sharing textual and audiovisual contents concerning children online by their parents or guardians, potentially impacting the construction of children’s digital identity before they can reach the age of consent. Based on a passive virtual ethnography carried out comparatively in Italian-speaking and English-speaking virtual communities focusing on children’s wellbeing and health, this paper offers an empirical contribution to the study of sharenting. While contributing to the wider debates on the practices and discourses about sharing in digital media, this paper provides an analysis of how online and offline parenting cultures affect sharenting practices; how the consequences of sharenting are addressed in online communities; and how the privacy vs openness tension about sharing contents is negotiated by parents with regards to their own and children needs even in terms of digital security.
AbidinC (2017) #Familygoals: Family influencers, calibrated amateurism, and justifying young digital labor. Social Media+Society. Epub ahead of print 5 June 2017. DOI: 10.1177/2056305117707191.
2.
AmmariTSchoenebeckSYMorrisMR (2014) Accessing social support and overcoming judgment on social media among parents of children with special needs. Proceedings of the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media8(1): 22–31.
3.
ArcherC (2019) Social media influencers, post-feminism and neoliberalism: How mum bloggers’ ‘playbour’ is reshaping public relations. Public Relations Inquiry8(2): 149–166.
4.
BaraldiC (2019) Poisoning children: A reflection on the social constraints of children’s agency and narratives of sexual abuse. Childhood26(2): 153–168.
5.
Blum-RossALivingstoneS (2017) “Sharenting,” parent blogging, and the boundaries of the digital self. Popular communication15(2): 110–125.
BurrowsRNettletonSPleaceN, et al. (2000) Virtual community care? Social policy and the emergence of computer mediated social support. Information, Communication & Society3(1): 95–121.
8.
ChalklenCAndersonH (2017) Mothering on Facebook: Exploring the privacy/openness paradox. Social Media+Society. Epub ahead of print 17 May 2017. DOI: 10.1177/2056305117707187.
ChiuCMHsuMHWangET (2006) Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems42(3): 1872–1888.
11.
CouldryN (2012) Media, Society, World: Social Theory and Digital Media Practice. London: Polity.
12.
DasR (2017) Speaking about birth: Visible and silenced narratives in online discussions of childbirth. Social Media+Society. Epub ahead of print 19 October 2017. DOI: 10.1177/2056305117735753.
13.
DavisJLJurgensonN (2014) Context collapse: Theorizing context collusions and collisions. Information, Communication & Society17(4): 476–485.
14.
DeiF (2019) Sfere dell’occulto e panico morale. Il caso degli abusi sull’infanzia. Psiche6(2): 393–404.
15.
DouglasSMichaelsM (2005) The Mommy Myth: The Idealization of Motherhood and How It has Undermined All Women. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
16.
DubéLBourhisAJacobR, et al. (2006) Towards a typology of virtual communities of practice. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge & Management1: 69–93.
17.
FairclothC (2014) Intensive parenting and the expansion of parenting. In: LeeEBristowJFairclothCMacvarishJ (eds) Parenting Culture Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.25–50.
18.
FairclothCHoffmanDMLayneLL (2013) Parenting in Global Perspective. London: Routledge.
19.
FoxAKHoyMG (2019) Smart devices, smart decisions? Implications of parents’ sharenting for children’s online privacy: An investigation of mothers. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing38(4): 414–432.
20.
FuchsC (2013) Social Media: A Critical Introduction. London: Sage.
21.
FurediF (2002) Paranoid Parenting: Why Ignoring the Experts May be Best for Your Child. Chicago, IL: Chicago Review Press.
22.
GarmendiaMMartínezGGaritaonandiaC (2021) Sharenting, parental mediation and privacy among Spanish children. European Journal of Communication. Epub ahead of print 20 May 2021. DOI: 10.1177/02673231211012146.
23.
GillespieT (2010) The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media & Society12(3): 347–364.
24.
GilliesV (2008) Perspectives on parenting responsibility: Contextualizing values and practices. Journal of Law and Society35(1): 95–112.
25.
GrayJ (2013) Feeding on the web: Online social support in the breastfeeding context. Communication Research Reports30: 1–11.
26.
HaslamDTeeABakerS (2017) The use of social media as a mechanism of social support in parents. Journal of Child and Family Studies26(7): 2026–2037.
27.
HaysS (1996) The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28.
HaysS (1998) The fallacious assumptions and unrealistic prescriptions of attachment theory: A comment on ‘parents’ socioemotional investment in children’. Journal of Marriage and Family60: 782–790.
29.
HsuH (2019) Instagram, Facebook, and the perils of ‘sharenting’. The New Yorker, 11September.
30.
JohnNA (2013) Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword. New Media & Society15(2): 167–182.
31.
JohnNA (2017) The Age of Sharing. Cambridge: Polity Press.
32.
JohnNA (2022) Sharing and social media: The decline of a keyword?New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 2 March 2022. DOI: 10.1177/14614448221078603.
33.
JohnsonSA (2015) ‘Intimate mothering publics’: Comparing face-to-face support groups and Internet use for women seeking information and advice in the transition to first-time motherhood. Culture, Health & Sexuality17(2): 237–251.
34.
KangT (2012) Gendered media, changing intimacy: Internet-mediated transnational communication in the family sphere. Media, Culture & Society34(2): 146–161.
35.
KatriniE (2018) Sharing culture: On definitions, values, and emergence. The Sociological Review66(2): 425–446.
KumarPSchoenebeckS (2015) The modern day baby book: Enacting good mothering and stewarding privacy on Facebook. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing, Vancouver BC, Canada, 14–18 March 2015, pp.1302–1312. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
38.
LangePG (2018) Sharing in the digital era: Histories and consequences. Media, Culture & Society40(7): 1101–1106.
LavorgnaASugiuraL (2022) Direct contacts with potential interviewees when carrying out online ethnography on controversial and polarized topics: A loophole in ethics guidelines. International Journal of Social Research Methodology25(2): 261–267.
41.
LavorgnaATartariMUgwudikeP (2022) Criminogenic features of social media platforms: The case of harmful sharenting practices. European Journal of Criminology. Epub ahead of print 21 November 2022 DOI: 10.1177/14773708221131659.
42.
LavorgnaAUgwudikePTartariM (2023) Online sharenting: Identifying existing vulnerabilities and demystifying media reported crime risks. Crime, Media, Culture. Epub ahead of print 11 January 2023 DOI: 10.1177/17416590221148448
43.
LeaverT (2017) Intimate surveillance: Normalizing parental monitoring and mediation of infants online. Social Media+Society. Epub ahead of print 5 June 2017. DOI: 10.1177/2056305117707192.
44.
LeaverTNansenB (2017) Infancy online: An introduction. Social Media+Society. 3(2): 205630511770719.
45.
LittEHargittaiE (2016) The imagined audience on social network sites. Social Media+Society2(1): 1–12. DOI: 10.1177/2056305116633482.
46.
LocatelliE (2017) Images of breastfeeding on Instagram: Self-representation, publicness, and privacy management. Social Media+Society3(2): 205630511770719.
47.
LuptonDPedersenSThomasGM (2016) Parenting and digital media: From the early web to contemporary digital society. Sociology Compass10: 730–743.
48.
MasurPKScharkowM (2016) Disclosure management on social network sites: Individual privacy perceptions and user-directed privacy strategies. Social Media+Society2(1): 1–13. DOI: 10.1177/2056305116634368.
49.
MeikleG (2016) Social Media: Communication, Sharing and Visibility. New York, NY: Routledge.
50.
NottinghamE (2019) ‘Dad! Cut that part out!’ Children’s rights to privacy in the age of ‘generation tagged’: Sharenting, digital kidnapping and the child micro-celebrity. In: MurrayJSwadenerBBSmithK (eds) International Handbook of Young Children’s Rights. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.183–191.
51.
PinkS (2016) Digital ethnography. Innovative methods in media and communication research. In: KubitschkoSKaunA (eds) Innovative Methods in Media and Communication Research. Cham: Springer, pp.161–165.
52.
RanziniGNewlandsGLutzC (2020) Sharenting, peer influence, and privacy concerns: A study on the instagram-sharing behaviors of parents in the United Kingdom. Social Media+Society6(4): 1–13. DOI: 10.1177/2056305120978376.
53.
SmythCCraigL (2017) Conforming to intensive parenting ideals: Willingness, reluctance and social context. Families, Relationships and Societies6(1): 107–124.
54.
Social Data Science Lab (2019) Lab online guide to social media research ethics. Available at: http://socialdatalab.net/ethics-resources (accessed 7 December 2022).
55.
StsiampkouskayaKJoinsonAPiwekL, et al. (2021) Imagined audiences, emotions, and feedback expectations in social media photo sharing. Social Media+Society7(3): 205630512110356.
56.
Sullivan-BolyaiSLeeMM (2011) Parent mentor perspectives on providing social support to empower parents. The Diabetes Educator37(1): 35–43.
57.
TerranovaT (2000) Free labor: Producing culture for the digital economy. Social Text18(2): 33–58.
58.
WagnerAGascheL (2018) Sharenting: Making decisions about other’s privacy on social network sites. In: Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik, Lüneburg, Deutschland, 6–9 March 2018, Darmstadt, Germany: Darmstadt Technical University.
59.
YoungALQuan-HaaseA (2013) Privacy protection strategies on Facebook: The Internet privacy paradox revisited. Information, Communication & Society16(4): 479–500.
