Internet shutdowns authorized by the state are becoming a recurring case in countries under military or authoritarian rule, such as Sudan. This article examines how the military in Sudan shut down the Internet to cover up the June 3 massacre. The shutdown made it difficult for the protestors and civilians to share and document the human rights violations committed by the state from June 3 to July 9, 2019. We also demonstrate how the Internet shutdowns were instrumental in circulating state-sponsored disinformation campaigns delegitimizing the protests. The article expands on existing literature to explain how information vacuums are conducive to the spread of disinformation and the weakening of on-ground protest movements. Despite the crippling effects of the Internet shutdown in Khartoum, our analysis illustrates how protestors challenged designed technical and physical workarounds to circumvent the shutdown.
BerdouE (2011) Organization in Open Source Communities. New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
BhatiaKVAroraP (2022) Discursive toolkits of anti-Muslim disinformation on Twitter. The International Journal of Press/Politics. Epub ahead of print 1March2022. DOI: 10.1177/19401612221084633
4.
CanellaG (2018) Racialized surveillance: Activist media and the policing of Black bodies. Communication Culture & Critique11(3): 378–398.
5.
CarspeckenP (1996) Critical Ethnography in Educational Research: A Theoretical and Practical Guide. New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
Chloé LynnN (2022) Facebook and the surveillance assemblage: Policing Black lives matter activists & suppressing dissent. Surveillance & Society20(1): 30–46.
EdwardsEFordSGajjalaR, et al. (2021) Shaheen Bagh: Making sense of (re)emerging “Subaltern” feminist political subjectivities in hashtag publics through critical, feminist interventions. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 7December2021. DOI: 10.1177/14614448211059121
10.
EubanksV (2011) Digital Dead End Fighting for Social Justice in the Information Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
FreyburgTGarbeL (2018) Blocking the bottleneck: Internet shutdowns and ownership at election times in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Communication12: 3896–3916.
GlasiusMMichaelsenM (2018) Authoritarian practices in the digital age| illiberal and authoritarian practices in the digital sphere — Prologue. International Journal Of Communication12: 19.
14.
HoustonSDHyndmanJMcLeanJ, et al. (2010) The methods and meanings of collaborative team research. Qualitative Inquiry16(4): 285–297.
15.
HowardPN (2010) Digital Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: The Internet and Political Islam. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16.
HowardPNAgarwalSDHussainMM (2011) When do states disconnect their digital networks? Regime responses to the political uses of social media. The Communication Review14(3): 216–232.
17.
Human Rights Council Resolution (2016) The Promotion, Protection, and Enjoyment of Human Rights on the Internet. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/845728?ln=en (accessed 30 April 2022)
International Telecommunications Union (2002) Constitution of The International Telecommunication Union. Available at: https://www.itu.int/council/pd/constitution.html (accessed 30 April 2022).
22.
KayeD (2017) UN Human Rights Council, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression. Available at: http://undocs.org/A/HRC/35/22 (accessed November 2021).
23.
KumarD (2006) Media, war, and propaganda: Strategies of information management during the 2003 Iraq war. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies3(1): 48–69.
24.
KuoRMarwickA (2021) Critical disinformation studies: History, power, and politics. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review 2(4): 2.
25.
LivholtsM (2012) To fill academic work with political passion: Nina Lykke’s cosmodolphins and contemporary post/academic writing strategies. Feminist Review102(1): 135–142.
26.
MadisonS (2019) Critical Ethnography: Method, Ethics, and Performance, 3rd edn. New York: Sage.
27.
MarwickALewisR (2017) Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online. New York, NY: Data & Society.
MurthyD (2017) The ontology of tweets: Mixed methods approach to the study of Twitter. In: SloanLQuan-HaaseA (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods. London: SAGE, pp.559–572.
NobleSU (2018) Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York, NY: NYU Press.
32.
PariserE (2011) The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding From You. London: Penguin.
33.
RettbergJW (2020) Situated data analysis: A new method for analysing encoded power relationships in social media platforms and apps. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications7(1): 5.
34.
RisamR (2018) New Digital Worlds: Postcolonial Digital Humanities in Theory, Praxis, and Pedagogy. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
RydzakJKaranjaMOpiyoN (2020) Dissent does not die in darkness: Network shutdowns and collective action in African countries. International Journal of Communication14: 4264–4287.
37.
ShahN (2021) (Dis)information blackouts: Politics and practices of Internet shutdowns. International Journal of Communication15: 2693–2709.
38.
SnowNTaylorPM (2006) The revival of the propaganda state: US propaganda at home and abroad since 9/11. International Communication Gazette68(5-6): 389–407.
39.
SuchmanL (1987) Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human–Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
SuchmanL (2007) Human–Machine Reconfigurations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
VouleC (2019) UN Human Rights Council, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Rights to Freedom of Peaceful Assembly And Association. Available at: http://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx?m=189 (accessed 10 March 2022).
42.
WagnerB (2016) Global Free Expression: Governing the Boundaries of Internet Content. Cham: Springer International.
43.
WagnerB (2018) Understanding Internet shutdowns: A case study from Pakistan. International Journal of Communication12: 1932–8036.
44.
WernimontJLoshE (2018) Introduction. In: LoshEWernimontJ (eds) Bodies of Information: Intersectional Feminism and the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp.ix–xxvi.
