Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The last decade has seen the rise of data capture culture. This culture has been most visible, and widely analysed, within the realm of social media; but it is not unique to that form. This article reconceptualises video games as apparatuses for data capture. We situate games within a broader economic and cultural shift towards a new ‘accelerated’ form of neoliberalism where individual choice and agency are pre-filtered and personalised by algorithms based on user data history. Through a survey of the changing role of data in video gaming, this article critically maps a new paradigm for a reimagined games industry driven by a logic of data capture. Gaming promises a unique opportunity for data capture capitalists to mine and commodify player preferences, behaviours and instinctual responses. Arguing that play is a process of uncovering hidden logics, we offer a framework for resisting the data capture hegemony. This is not simply a discussion of gaming, rather this is an attempt to outline the conditions of possibility for a critique of globalised digital culture in which populations are profiled, processed and punished by hidden algorithms of the market that are optimised to construct and reward accelerated performances of neoliberal subjectivity.

Keywords

algorithms capitalism data capture neoliberalism video games

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bogle

(2016) How the gurus behind Google Earth created ‘Pokémon Go’. Mashable Australia, 11 July.

Cutchin

(2019) How U.S. video game companies are building tools for China’s surveillance state. Los Angeles Times, 22 July.

Cybulski

(2014) Enclosures at play: Surveillance in the code and culture of videogames. Surveillance & Society 12(3): 427–432.

Debatin

Lovejoy

Horn

, et al. (2009) Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 15(1): 83–108.

Deterding

Dixon

Khaled

, et al. (2011) From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. In: Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments, Tampere, Finland, 28–30 September 2011, pp.9–15.

Friedman

(1999) Civilization and its discontents: Simulation, subjectivity, and space. In: Smith GM (ed.) On a Silver Platter: CD-ROMs and the Promises of a New Technology. New York, NY: New York University Press, pp.132–150.

Gabrielle

(2018) Gamified life, aeon. Available at: https://aeon.co/essays/how-employers-have-gamified-work-for-maximum-profit (accessed 18 July 2020).

Harvey

(2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Manovich

(2001) The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

10.

Meades

(2015) Understanding Counterplay in Video Games, vol. 5. London: Routledge.

11.

Niantic (2018) Niantic privacy policy. Available at: https://nianticlabs.com/privacy/en/ (accessed 18 July 2020).

12.

Reyes

Wijesekera

Reardon

, et al. (2018) “Won’t somebody think of the children?” examining COPPA compliance at scale. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2018(3): 63–83.

13.

Snyder

(2017) Speedrunning: Interviews With the Quickest Gamers. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.

14.

Srnicek

(2017) Platform Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

15.

Stafford

(2019) The Dangers of In-game Data Collection. Polygon. Available at: https://www.polygon.com/features/2019/5/9/18522937/video-game-privacy-player-data-collection (accessed 18 July 2020).

16.

Zuboff

(2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile Books.

Games and data capture culture: play in the era of accelerated neoliberalism

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References