Careful attunements: the choreographing of care and affective witnessing through media practices during,and after,crisis

Abstract

This paper takes a design anthropology approach to understanding the learnings, challenges and opportunities Victorians adopted to choreograph practices of care in and through media practice during and after the Australian 2019–2020 bushfire crisis. In doing so, we frame our inquiry from a perspective of how individuals and communities care through media practice. The study weaves together experiences around informal and formal crisis communication media – such as the government’s VicEmergency App, Australian and international news media and social media sharing – to map what we call the careful attunements of choreographing care.

Keywords

affective witnessing care practices creative methods crisis communication focus groups mobile media

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbas

Michael

(2020) The coronavirus contact tracing app won’t log your location, but it will reveal who you hang out with. The Conversation, 16 April. Available at: https://theconversation.com/the-coronavirus-contact-tracing-app-wont-log-your-location-but-it-will-reveal-who-you-hang-out-with-136387 (accessed 20 January 2021).

Acar

Muraki

(2011) Twitter for crisis communication: Lessons learned from Japan’s tsunami disaster. International Journal of Web Based Communities 7(3): 392–402.

AHRC (2018) Cultural value project. Available at: https://ahrc.ukri.org/research/fundedthemesandprogrammes/culturalvalueproject/ (accessed 20 January 2021).

Alinejad

(2019) Careful co-presence: The transnational mediation of emotional intimacy. Social Media + Society 5: 1–11.

Alinejad

(2021) Techno-emotional mediations of transnational intimacy: Social media and care relations in long-distance Romanian families. Media Culture & Society 43(3): 444–459.

Bennett

(2019) The big anxiety festival. Available at: https://www.thebiganxiety.org/welcome/ (accessed 20 January 2021).

boyd

(2010) Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In: Papacharissi

(ed.) A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.39–58.

Brighenti

(2017) The visible: Element of the social. Frontiers in Sociology 2. pp.1–11. DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2017.00017

Bruns

Burgess

Crawford

Shaw

(2012) #qldfloods and @QPSMedia: Crisis Communication on Twitter in the 2011 South East Queensland Floods. Brisbane, Australia: ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation.

10.

Bulter

(2006) Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.

11.

Cabalquinto

ECB

(2021) Telecocooning in the age of (im)mobility. Communication Culture & Critique 14(2): 351–355.

12.

Clark

(2012) The Parent App: Understanding Families in the Digital Age. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

13.

Duke

Montag

(2017) Smartphone addiction and beyond: Initial insights on an emerging research topic and its relationship to Internet addiction. In: Montag

Reuter

(eds) Internet Addiction: Neuroscientific Approaches and Therapeutical Implications Including Smartphone Addiction. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.359–372.

14.

Environment Protection Authority (2020) How we calculate air quality categories. Environment Protection Authority Victoria. Available at: https://www.epa.vic.gov.au/for-community/monitoring-your-environment/about-epa-airwatch/calculate-air-quality-categories (accessed 20 January 2021).

15.

Foster

(2002) Dances That Describe Themselves: The Improvised Choreography of Richard Bull. Middletown, CT: Wesleyen University Press.

16.

Gill

Steger

Slater

(2013) Japan Copes With Calamity. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

17.

Gourlay

Leslie

Martino

, et al. (2020) How heat and drought turned Australia into a tinderbox. ABC News. Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-02-19/australia-bushfires-how-heat-and-drought-created-a-tinderbox/11976134?nw=0 (accessed 20 January 2021).

18.

Gunn

Donovan

(2012) Design and Anthropology. Anthropological Studies of Creativity and Perception. Farnham: Ashgate.

19.

Gunn

Otto

Charlotte-Smith

(2013) Design Anthropology: Theory and Practice. London and New York: Bloomsbury.

20.

Habuchi

(2005) Accelerating reflexivity. In: Matsuda Ito

Okabe

(eds) Personal, Portable, Pedestrian: Mobile Phones in Japanese Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.165–182.

21.

Hjorth

Richardson

Balmford

(2016). Careful surveillance and pet wearables: At home with animals. Available at: https://theconversation.com/careful-surveillance-andpet-wearables-at-home-with-animals-63883 (accessed 20 January 2021).

22.

Hjorth

Harris

(2019a) Creative Practice Ethnographies. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

23.

Katz

Aarkhus

(2002) Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

24.

Keightley

Reading

(2014) Mediated mobilities. Media Culture & Society 36(3): 285–301.

25.

Hjorth

Kim

KHY

(2011) The mourning after: A case study of social media in the 3.11 earthquake disaster in Japan. Television & New Media 12(6): 552–559.

26.

Koob

(2020) ‘Like times of war’: Inside the huge Mallacoota evacuation. The Age. Available at: https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/like-times-of-war-inside-the-huge-mallacoota-evacuation-20200110-p53qdr.html (accessed 20 January 2021).

27.

Kyriakidou

(2015) Media witnessing: Exploring the audience of distant suffering. Media, Culture & Society 37(2): 215–231.

28.

Lamarre

(2017) Platformativity: Media studies, area studies. Asiascape: Digital Asia 4(3): 285–305.

29.

Lasen

(2004) Affective technologies – Emotions and mobile phones. Receiver #11: Connecting to the future: n.p. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/472410/Affective_Technologies._Emotions_and_Mobile_Phones (accessed 20 January 2021).

30.

Akama

Light

(2020) Readiness for contingency: Punctuation, poise, and co-design. CoDesign 16: 17–28.

31.

Light

(2014) Disconnecting With Social Networking Sites. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave.

32.

Hjorth

Lupton

(2021) Digitised caring intimacies: more-than-human intergenerational care in Japan. International Journal of Cultural Studies 24: 584–602.

33.

Mannell

(2019) A typology of mobile messaging’s disconnective affordances. Mobile Media & Communication 7(1): 76–93.

34.

Matheson

(2018) The performance of publicness in social media: Tracing patterns in tweets after a disaster. Media Culture & Society 40(4): 584–599.

35.

Matsuda

(2009) Mobile media and the transformation of family. In: Hjorth

G, L

, (ed.) Mobile Technologies: From Telecommunication to Media. London: Routledge, pp.62–72.

36.

Miller

(2011) Tales From Facebook. Cambridge: Polity Press.

37.

Moores

(2012) Media, Place and Mobility. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

38.

Hjorth

Ohashi

Sinanan

Horst

, et al. (2019b) Locating the mobile ARC linkage public report. Available at: https://dcp-ecp.com/reports/locating-the-mobile (accessed 20 January 2021).

39.

Papacharissi

(2014) Affective Publics. New York, NY: Routledge.

40.

Papacharissi

(2016) Affective publics and structures of storytelling: Sentiment, events and mediality. Information Communication & Society 19(3): 307–324.

41.

Papailias

(2016) Witnessing in the age of the database: Viral memorials, affective publics, and the assemblage of mourning. Memory Studies 9(4): 1–18.

42.

Papailias

(2018) (Un)seeing dead refugee bodies: Mourning memes, spectropolitics, and the haunting of Europe. Media Culture & Society 41(8): 1–21.

43.

Park

(2005) Mobile Phone Addiction BT in Mobile Communications: Re-negotiation of the Social Sphere. London: Springer London, pp.253–272.

44.

Pink

Horst

Postill

, et al. (2016) Digital Ethnography. London: SAGE.

45.

Pols

(2012) Care at a Distance: On the Closeness of Technology. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amersterdam University Press.

46.

Richardson

Schankweiler

(2019) Affective witnessing. In: Slaby

von

(eds) Affective Societies: Key Concepts. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 166–177.

47.

Stanley

Granick

J S

(2020) The Limits of Location Tracking in an Epidemic. ACLU. Available at: https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/field_document/limits_of_location_tracking_in_an_epidemic.pdf (accessed 20 January 2021).

48.

Tan

Prasanna

Stock

, et al. (2017) Mobile applications in crisis informatics literature: A systematic review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 24: 297–311.

49.

Taylor

(2020) Covidsafe app: how Australia’s coronavirus tracing app works, what it does, downloads and problems. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/may/15/covid-safe-app-australia-how-download-does-it-work-australian-government-covidsafe-covid19-tracking-downloads (accessed 20 January 2021).

50.

Van Djick

(2014) Datafication, dataism and dataveillance. Surveillance & Society 12(2): 197–208.

51.

Werner

Lyons

(2020) The size of Australia’s bushfire crisis captured in five big numbers. ABC News. Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2020-03-05/bushfire-crisis-five-big-numbers/12007716 (accessed 20 January 2021).

52.

World Health Organization (2019) What is the evidence on the role of the arts in improving health and well-being? A scoping review. Available at: http://www.euro.who.int/en/publications/abstracts/what-is-the-evidence-on-the-role-of-the-arts-in-improving-health-and-well-being-a-scoping-review-2019 (accessed 20 January 2021).