The turn to regulation in digital communication: the ACCC’s digital platforms inquiry and Australian media policy

Abstract

This article provides an overview of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) Digital Platforms Inquiry, as a case study in the new thinking about digital platform regulation taking place in many nations. With its focus upon the impact of digital platforms on news and journalism, the ACCC Inquiry parallels other reviews, such as the Cairncross Review on the Future of Journalism in the United Kingdom. While the Inquiry had a somewhat ‘accidental’ history, the core issues that it raised have acquired considerable political resonance in Australia. The concept of harms provides a useful lens through which to understand the ACCC’s focus, as it identified harms caused by the market dominance of Google and Facebook for traditional news media businesses, and for consumers and citizens. Responding to the ACCC Final Report will present challenges in identifying the public good dimension of journalism and who should pay for it, the scope and reach of digital platform regulation and its relationship to media policy and regulation, and the scope for small nations to effectively manage the power of global digital platform giants.

Keywords

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission digital platforms future of news journalism media policy media regulation online harms privacy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) (2018a) ACCC Digital Platforms Inquiry (Preliminary Report). Canberra, ACT, Australia: ACCC. Available at: https://www.accc.gov.au/focus-areas/inquiries/digital-platforms-inquiry. (accessed 27 May 2020)

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) (2018b) Digital platforms inquiry issues paper. Available at: https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/DPI%20-%20Issues%20Paper%20-%20Vers%20for%20Release%20-%2025%20F.._%20%28006%29.pdf. (accessed 27 May 2020)

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) (2019a) Digital Platforms Inquiry: Final Report. Canberra, ACT, Australia: ACCC.

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) (2019b) Google allegedly misled consumers on collection and use of location data (Media Release 199/19). Available at: https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/google-allegedly-misled-consumers-on-collection-and-use-of-location-data. (accessed 27 May 2020)

Australian Government (2019) Regulating in the Digital Age: Government Response and Implementation Roadmap for the Digital Platforms Inquiry. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Australian Government.

Australian Law Reform Commission (2012) Classification – content regulation and convergent media. Final report, Australian Law Reform Commission, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Australian Law Reform Commission (2014) Serious invasions of privacy in the digital era. Final report no. 123. Brisbane, QLD, Australia: Australian Law Reform Commission.

Bagga

Heyden

(2018) Consumer Use of News. Roy Morgan Research. Available at: https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/ACCC%20consumer%20survey%20-%20Consumer%20use%20of%20news%2C%20Roy%20Morgan%20Research.pdf. (accessed 27 May 2020)

Bell

(2018) The dependent press: how Silicon Valley threatens independent journalism. In: Moore

Tambini

(eds) Digital Dominance: The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 241–261.

10.

Benkler

Faris

Roberts

(2018) Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

11.

Cairncross

(2019) The Cairncross Review: A Sustainable Future for Journalism. UK Government. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-cairncross-review-a-sustainable-future-for-journalism

12.

Christchurch Call (2019) Christchurch Call to eliminate violent and terrorist content online. Available at: https://www.christchurchcall.com/. (accessed 27 May 2020)

13.

Cohen

(2017) Law for the platform economy. U.C. Davis Law Review 51(1): 133–204.

14.

Convergence Review Committee (2012) Convergence Review: Final Report. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, Australian Government.

15.

Cunningham

Flew

Swift

(2015) Media Economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

16.

Department of Communication and the Arts (2019) Terms of Reference – Review of Australian Classification Regulation. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Australian Government.

17.

Digital Competition Expert Panel (2019) Unlocking digital competition: report of the digital competition expert panel. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/785547/unlocking_digital_competition_furman_review_web.pdf

18.

Doyle

(2015) Why ownership pluralism still matters in a multi-platform world. In: Valcke

Sukosd

Picard

(eds) Media Pluralism and Diversity: Concepts, Risks and Global Trends. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 297–309.

19.

European Commission (2018) Code of practice on disinformation. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/code-practice-disinformation

20.

Flew

(2016) Convergent media policy: reflections on the Australian case. In: Simpson

Van den Bulck

Puppis

(eds) European Media Policy for the Twenty-First Century: Assessing the Past, Setting Agendas for the Future. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 219–237.

21.

Flew

(2019a) Guarding the gatekeepers: trust, truth and digital platforms. Griffith Review 64: 94–103.

22.

Flew

(2019b) The platformized internet: issues for internet law and policy. Journal of Internet Law 22(11): 3–16.

23.

Flew

Martin

Suzor

(2019) Internet regulation as media policy: rethinking the question of digital communication platform governance. Journal of Digital Media & Policy 10(1): 33–50.

24.

Foster

Bunting

(2018) Public Funding of High-Quality Journalism: A Report for the ACCC. Communication Chambers. Available at: https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/ACCC%20commissioned%20report%20-%20Public%20funding%20of%20high-quality%20journalism%20-%20phase%201%2C%20Communications%20Chambers.PDF. (accessed 27 May 2020)

25.

Gillespie

(2018) Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

26.

Ginosar

(2013) Media governance: a conceptual framework or merely a buzz word? Communication Theory 23(2): 356–374.

27.

Gorwa

(2019a) The platform governance triangle: conceptualising the informal regulation of online content. Internet Policy Review 8(2): 1–22.

28.

Gorwa

(2019b) What is platform governance? Information, Communication & Society 22(6): 854–871.

29.

House of Commons (2019). Disinformation and ‘Fake News’: Final Report. London: Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee.

30.

Jack

(2017) What’s propaganda got to do with it? Data & society: points. Available at: https://points.datasociety.net/whats-propaganda-got-to-do-with-it-5b88d78c3282#.civ4bsqz8. (accessed 27 May 2020)

31.

Khan

(2018) Amazon – an infrastructure service and its challenge to current antitrust law. In: Moore

Tambini

(eds) Digital Dominance: The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 98–129.

32.

Langvardt

(2019) A new deal for the online public sphere. George Mason Law Review 26(1). Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3149513

33.

McKnight

(2012) Rupert Murdoch: An Investigation of Political Power. Crows Nest, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin.

34.

Mathiason

(2009) Internet Governance: The New Frontier of Global Institutions. Abingdon: Routledge.

35.

Merritt

(2019) ACCC calls for tech giants to pay for journalism. The Australian, 16 November. Available at: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/accc-calls-for-tech-giants-to-pay-for-journalism/news-story/3e30eaaa296b07e3244efd187c030999. (accessed 27 May 2020)

36.

Milner

(2019) Facebook fightback: ACCC has not made the case for its most striking plan. Sydney Morning Herald, 18 February. Available at: https://www.smh.com.au/national/facebook-fightback-accc-has-not-made-the-case-for-its-most-striking-plan-20190217-p50ych.html. (accessed 27 May 2020)

37.

Mueller

(2017) Will the Internet Fragment? Cambridge: Polity.

38.

Napoli

(2019a) Social Media and the Public Interest: Media Regulation in the Disinformation Age. New York: Columbia University Press.

39.

Napoli

(2019b) What if more speech is no longer the solution? First amendment theory meets fake news and the filter bubble. Federal Communications Law Journal 70(1): 57–104.

40.

Nash

Bright

Margetts

, et al. (2017) Public policy in the platform society. Policy and Internet 9(3–4): 368–373.

41.

Newman

Fletcher

(2018) Platform reliance, information intermediaries, and news diversity: a look at the evidence. In: Moore

Tambini

(eds) Digital Dominance: The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 153–175.

42.

News Corp Australia (2018) Submission to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission digital platforms inquiry issues paper. Available at: https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/News%20Corp%20Australia%20%28April%202018%29.pdf. (accessed 27 May 2020)

43.

Papandrea

Tiffen

(2016) Media ownership and concentration in Australia. In: Noam

(ed.) Who Owns the World’s Media? Media Concentration and Ownership around the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 703–739.

44.

Picard

Pickard

(2017) Essential Principles for Contemporary Media and Communications Policymaking. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford. Available at: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/essential-principles-contemporary-media-and-communications-policymaking

45.

Puppis

(2010) Media governance: a new concept for the analysis of media policy and regulation. Communication, Culture & Critique 3(2): 134–149.

46.

Senate

(2018) Select Committee on the Future of Public Interest Journalism – Report. Commonwealth of Australia. Available at: https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Future_of_Public_Interest_Journalism/PublicInterestJournalism. (accessed 27 May 2020)

47.

Shapiro

(2018) Antitrust in a time of populism. International Journal of Industrial Organization 61: 714–748.

48.

Soriano

(2019) Taking aim at big tech. Intermedia 47(2): 10–15.

49.

Tambini

(2017) Fake News: Public Policy Responses (LSE Media Policy Brief 20). London: Media Policy Project, London School of Economics and Political Science.

50.

UK Government (2019) Online Harms White Paper: Digital, Culture, Media & Sport. London: UK Government.

51.

UK Government (2020) Online harms white paper – initial consultation response. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-harms-white-paper/public-feedback/online-harms-white-paper-initial-consultation-response. (accessed 27 May 2020)

52.

Van der Sluijs

(2013) Soft law – an international concept in a national context. Scandinavian Studies in Law 58: 285–306.

53.

Van Dijck

Poell

De Wall

(2018) The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

54.

Varley

Bagga

(2018) Consumer Views and Behaviours on Digital Platforms. Roy Morgan Research. Available at: https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/ACCC%20consumer%20survey%20-%20Consumer%20views%20and%20behaviours%20on%20digital%20platforms%2C%20Roy%20Morgan%20Research.pdf

55.

Wilding

Fray

Molitorisz

, et al. (2018) The Impact of Digital Platforms on News and Journalistic Content. University of Technology Sydney. Available at: https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/ACCC%20commissioned%20report%20-%20The%20impact%20of%20digital%20platforms%20on%20news%20and%20journalistic%20content%2C%20Centre%20for%20Media%20Transition%20%282%29.pdf

56.

(2018) The Curse of Bigness: Antitrust in the New Gilded Age. New York: Columbia Global Reports.

57.

Yeung

(2018) Algorithmic regulation: a critical interrogation. Regulation & Governance 12: 505–523.