This article investigates the kinds of evaluative practices that are employed when gatekeepers in TV want to maximise creativity. By analysing the evaluative regimes used in TV idea development, the analysis points to how a simplicity regime is used in the observed idea development sessions, with ideas being judged constantly as to whether they are clear and simple enough. Using observations, interviews and briefs as data sources, the article concludes that the desire of gatekeeping editors to maximise creativity can place significant pressure on developers who find it difficult to live up to these desires. In addition, the findings suggest that these developers primarily develop ideas for their immediate gatekeeping editors and that the TV viewers are not considered as equally important in their idea development process.
AlačovskaA (2013) Creativity in the brief: travel guidebook writers and good work. In: ChristensenBTMoeranB (eds) Exploring Creativity: Evaluative Practices in Innovation, Design, and the Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 172–190.
2.
AmabileTM (1983) The social psychology of creativity: a componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology45: 357–376.
3.
AndersenMM (2017) Negotiating creativity on a small budget: creative assumptions in DR3’s TV commissioning. Nordicom Review39(1): 19–32.
4.
AndersenMMT (2018) DR3 på flow og streaming – en todelt kanalanalyse. MedieKultur65: 138–157.
5.
AndersenMMT (2019) DR3 og det kreative pres. PhD dissertation, Aarhus University.
6.
AppaduraiA (1986) The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BanksMJConorBMayerV (2015) Production Studies, the Sequel! Cultural Studies of Global Media Industries. New York: Routledge.
8.
BruunH (2014) Eksklusive Informanter: Om forskningsinterviewet som redskab i produktionsanalysen. Nordicom Information36: 29–45.
9.
CaldwellJT (2008) Production Culture: Industrial Reflexivity and Critical Practice in Film and Television. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
10.
CoughlanTJohnsonP (2008) Idea management in creative lives. In: Extended abstracts proceedings of the 2008 conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’08, Florence, 5–10 April 2008, pp. 3081–3086. New York: ACM.
11.
CsikszentmihalyiM (1988) Society, culture, and person: a systems view of creativity. In: SternbergRJ (ed.) The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 325–339.
12.
CsikszentmihalyiM (1997) Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: Harper Perennial.
13.
DraperJ (2014) Theorizing creative agency through ‘discerned savvy’: a tool for the critical study of media industries. Media, Culture & Society36: 1118–1133.
14.
DrivsholmLS (2017) Kanalchefer om DR3: Stemningen var nok en smule panisk [Channel bosses on DR3: The mood was probably a bit panicky]. Information (Danish newspaper).
15.
FrandsenK (2007) Produktionsanalyse: teoretiske og metodiske problemstillinger. In: FrandsenKBruunH (eds) Tv-produktion – nye vilkår. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur, pp. 23–54.
16.
GuilfordJP (1950) Creativity. American Psychologist5: 444–454.
17.
HavensT (2018) Production. In: KackmanMKearneyMC (eds) The Craft of Criticism: Critical Media Studies in Practice. New York: Routledge, pp. 268–278.
18.
HavensTLotzAD (2016) Understanding Media Industries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
HesmondhalghD (2007) The Cultural Industries. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
20.
HesmondhalghD (2013) The Cultural Industries. London: Sage.
21.
HesmondhalghDBakerS (2011) Creative Labour: Media Work in Three Cultural Industries. London: Routledge.
22.
InieNDalsgaardP (2017) A typology of design ideas. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI conference on creativity and cognition, Singapore, 27–30 June 2017, pp. 393–406. New York: ACM.
23.
KvaleSBrinkmannS (2015) Interview: Det Kvalitative Forskningsinterview Som Håndværk [Interview: The Qualitative Research Interview as a Craft]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel.
24.
LiVShawAOlsonKR (2013) Ideas versus labor: what do children value in artistic creation?Cognition127: 38–45.
25.
McIntyreP (2012) Creativity and Cultural Production: Issues for Media Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
SaldañaJ (2013) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
27.
SawyerK (2003) Group Creativity: Music, Theater, Collaboration. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
SawyerK (2013) Evaluative practices in the creative industries. In: MoeranBChristensenBT (eds) Exploring Creativity: Evaluative Practices in Innovation, Design and the Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 278–304.
29.
SawyerKDeZutterS (2009) Distributed creativity: how collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts3: 81–92.
30.
ShibataSSuzukiN (2002) Effects of the foliage plant on task performance and mood. Journal of Environmental Psychology22: 265–272.
31.
ShoemakerPJ (1991) Gatekeeping. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
SimmelG (1978) The Philosophy of Money. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
34.
SøndergaardH (2003) Programfladestyring og organisationsforandringer i nordisk public service-fjernsyn [Scheduling strategies and organisational changes in Nordic public service television]. Mediekultur19: 5–22.
35.
StudenteSSeppalaNSadowskaN (2016) Facilitating creative thinking in the classroom: investigating the effects of plants and the colour green on visual and verbal creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity19: 1–8.
36.
WhiteDM (1950) The ‘gate keeper’: a case study in the selection of news. Journalism Quarterly27: 383–390.
37.
YtrebergE (2000) Tekstproduksjonsstudier som medievitenskapelig forskningsområde [Text production studies as a media studies research area]. Nordicom Information2: 51–60.
