This article focuses on contributions and pitfalls of multistakeholder approaches to Public Service Media policymaking. It asks whether the inclusion of stakeholders effectively leads to more coherent and sustainable policies or whether it mainly serves as window dressing and as additional inroad for the private sector to lobby against Public Service Media. First, we discuss multistakeholderism on the basis of deliberative democracy research and scholarly insights on the inclusion of stakeholders in media policy. Subsequently, we present results from Public Service Media policymaking in Flanders since 2010, examining seven instances of multistakeholder policymaking. Findings show that the reality of multistakeholderism is not necessarily inclusive, seems concerned predominantly with the interests of legacy media and does not prevent continued informal lobbying from commercial media. Even when the process is led by academics, politicians instrumentalize results and rarely with a view to improve Public Service Media as democratic policy project.
AntanovaS (2011) ‘Capacity-building’ in global Internet governance: the long-term outcomes of ‘multistakeholderism’. Regulation & Governance5(4): 425–445.
2.
CammaertsB (2011) Power dynamics in multi–stakeholder policy processes and intra civil society networking. In: MansellRRaboyM (eds) The Handbook of Global Media and Communication Policy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 131–147.
3.
ChakravarttyP (2006) Who speaks for the governed? World summit on information society, civil society and the limits of ‘multistakeholderism’. Economic & Political Weekly41(3): 250–257.
4.
ChambersS (2003) Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science6(1): 307–326.
5.
CohenJ (2011) [1989]) Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In: GripsrudJMoeHMolanderAet al. (eds). The Public Sphere. New York: Sage, pp. 31–50.
6.
CornwallA (2008) Unpacking ‘participation’: models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal43(3): 269–283.
7.
DanyC (2008) Civil society participation under most favourable conditions: assessing the deliberative quality of the WSIS. In: SteffekJKisslingCNanzP (eds). Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 53–70.
8.
DondersK (2015) State aid to public service media: European Commission decisional practice before and after the 2009 Broadcasting Communication. European State Aid Law Quarterly15(1): 68–87.
9.
DondersKMoeH (eds) (2011) Ex Ante Tests in Europe: From Diverging Perspectives to Infinite Conclusions. Göteborg: Nordicom.
10.
DondersKRaatsT (2012) Analysing national practices after European State aid control: are multi-stakeholder negotiations beneficial for public service broadcasting?Media, Culture & Society34(2): 162–180.
11.
DondersKPauwelsCLoisenJ (2012) Introduction: all or nothing? From public service broadcasting to public service media, to public service ‘anything’?International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics8(1): 3–12.
12.
DryzekJS (2012) Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
DryzekJSListC (2003) Social choice theory and deliberative democracy. British Journal of Political Science33(1): 1–28.
14.
EneL (2017) Media Ownership: Children’s TV Channels in Europe: Who Are the Key Players?Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.
15.
Flemish Community (2007) Decree creating the council for culture, youth, sports and media. Belgisch Staatsblad1: 1165ff.
16.
Flemish Community (2015) Beheersovereenkomst 2016–2020 tussen de laamse Gemeenschap en de VRT [Management contract 2016–2020 between the Flemish Community and the VRT]. Brussels: Flemish Community.
17.
FloridaA (2013) Participatory democracy versus deliberative democracy: elements for a possible theoretical genealogy. In: Proceedings of the 7th ECPR general conference, Bordeaux, 4–7 September. Paris: Sciences Po.
18.
FreemanE (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. London: Pitman Publishing.
19.
GeenensR (2007) The deliberative model of democracy: two critical remarks. International Journal of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law20(3): 355–377.
20.
GutmannAThompsonD (2004) Why Deliberative Democracy?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
HintzA (2007) Deconstructing multi-stakeholderism: the discourses and realities of global governance at the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS). In: Proceedings of the SGIR Pan-European international relations conference, September. Available at: citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.408.5532&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 11th December 2017).
22.
HintzAMilanS (2009) At the margins of Internet governance: grassroots tech groups and communication policy. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics5(1–2): 23–38.
23.
HixS (2008) What’s Wrong with the European Union and How to Fix It. Cambridge: Polity Press.
24.
HofmannJ (2016) Multi-stakeholderism in Internet governance: putting a fiction into practice. Journal of Cyber Policy1(1): 29–49.
25.
JakubowiczK (2011) Public service broadcasting: product (and victim) of public policy. In: MansellRRaboyM (eds) The Handbook of Global Media and Communication Policy. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 210–229.
26.
KlüverH (2013) Lobbying in the European Union: Interest Groups, Lobbying Coalitions, and Policy Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
LietenI (2010) Visienota: de VRT als uitdager en partner in het Vlaamse medialandschap [White paper: VRT as challenger and partner in the Flemish Media landscape]. Brussels: Flemish Community.
28.
MansbridgeJ (2009) The place of self-interest and the role of power in deliberative democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy18(1): 64–100.
29.
MayringP (2007) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. Basel: Beltz.
30.
OJ C 257/1:2009 (2009) Communication on the application of the state aid rules to public service broadcasting.
31.
PadovaniCPavanE (2011) Actors and interactions in global communication governance: the heuristic potential of a network approach. In: MansellRRaboyM (eds) The Handbook of Global Media and Communication Policy. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 543–563.
32.
PaulussenSPanisKDhoestAet al. (2015) De Vlaming over de VRT. Publieksbevraging 2015 [The Fleming regarding VRT: audience survey 2015]. Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
33.
PohleJ (2015) Multistakeholderism Unmasked: How the Netmundial Initiative Shifts Battlegrounds in Internet Governance. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2827666 (accessed 12th December 2017).
34.
RaatsTEvensTVanhaeghtA-Set al. (2015) Stakeholderbevraging ter voorbereiding van de nieuwe beheersovereenkomst van de VRT [Stakeholder inquiry in preparation of the VRT management contract]. Brussels: imec-SMIT-VUB.
35.
RaatsTvan den BulckHD’HaenensL (eds) (2017) Een VRT voor morgen of morgen geen VRT meer? De publieke omroep tussen politiek, publiek, partners en concurrenten [A VRT for tomorrow or tomorrow no more VRT? The public service broadcasting institution between politics, audiences, partners and competitors]. Kalmthout: Pelckmans Pro.
36.
RaboyM (1995) The role of public consultation in shaping the Canadian broadcasting system. Canadian Journal of Political Science28: 455–477.
37.
RaboyMPadovaniC (2010) Mapping global media policy: concepts, frameworks, methods. Communication, Culture & Critique3(2): 150–169.
38.
SchreierM (2014) Qualitative content analysis. In: FlickU (ed.) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage, pp. 170–183.
39.
Sectorial Council for Media (2010) Beheersovereenkomst tussen de openbare omroep en de Vlaamse Gemeenschap voor de periode 2012–2016. Een duidelijke keuze voor kwaliteitsvolle invulling [Management contract between public broadcaster and the Flemish Community for the period 2012–2016: a distinct choice for quality]. Brussels: Sectorraad Media.
40.
Sectorial Council for Media (2015) Advies beheersovereenkomst 2016–2020 tussen de Vlaamse gemeenschap en de VRT [Advice management contract 2016–2020 between Flemish Community and VRT]. Brussels: Sectorraad Media.
41.
SorochanC (2016) Participation as ideology in Occupy Wall Street. In: BarneyDColemannGRossCet al. (eds) The Participatory Condition in the Digital Age. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 22–43.
42.
SteemersJ (2017) Industry engagement with policy on public service television for children: BBC Charter Review and the Public Service Content Fund. Media Industries. Epub ahead of print 26 May. DOI: 10.3998/mij.15031809.0004.107
SteffekJNanzP (2008) Emergent patterns of civil society participation in global and European governance. In: SteffekJKisslingCNanzP (eds) Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance: A Cure for the Democratic Deficit?Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–29.
45.
StoneyCWinstanleyD (2001) Stakeholding: confusion or utopia? Mapping the conceptual terrain. Journal of Management Studies38(5): 603–626.
46.
Van den BulckH (2015) Public service media accountability in recent decades: a Progressive shift from State to market. In: IbarraKANowakEKuhnR (eds) Public Service Media in Europe: A Comparative Approach. London: Routledge, pp. 73–88.
47.
Van den BulckHDondersK (2014a) Of discourses, stakeholders and advocacy coalitions in media policy: tracing negotiations towards the new management contract of Flemish public broadcaster VRT. European Journal of Communication29(1): 83–99.
48.
Van den BulckHDondersK (2014b) Pitfalls and obstacles of media policy making in an age of digital convergence: the Flemish signal integrity case. Journal of Information Policy4: 444–462.
49.
Van den BulckHDondersK (2016) Naar een nieuwe beheersovereenkomst. Multistakeholdersonderhandelingen en politiek [Towards a new management contract: multistakeholder negotiations and politics]. In: RaatsTVan den BulckHD’HaenensL (eds) Een VRT voor morgen of morgen geen VRT meer? De publieke omroep tussen politiek, publiek, partners en concurrenten. Kalmthout: Pelckmans Pro, pp. 179–200.
50.
VennessonP (2008) Case studies and process tracing. In: PortaDKeatingM (eds) Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 223–239.
51.
VRM (2017) Advies aan de Vlaamse Regering betreffende de nieuwe omroepdienst Ketnet Jr [Advice for the Flemish Government Regarding New Broadcasting Service Ketnet Jr.]. Brussels: Flemish Regulator for the Media.
52.
WalterM (2009) Participatory action research. In: BrymanA (ed.) Social Research Methods. London: Falmer Press, pp. 151–158.
