This article examines the role of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in transnational expectant motherhood in the context of birth tourism, a growing form of transnational family arrangement. This research is primarily based on interviews with Taiwanese women who have participated in birth tourism in the United States. The findings suggest that long-distance intimacy is now primarily mediated through ICT use, which not only functions to fulfil the women’s emotional needs but also largely serves to bring the women’s reproductive bodies under the surveillance of their geographically distant spouses. This is because pregnant bodies serve as a spectacle of intimacy during expectant parenthood. To manage this digital surveillance, some mothers develop strategies of resistance regarding ICT use. This includes the choice of less media-rich tools and the delayed use of ICTs, which allow temporal and spatial distance from the digital gaze of the father.
BaldassarL (2008) Missing kin and longing to be together: emotions and the construction of co-presence in transnational relationships. Journal of Intercultural Studies29(3): 247–266.
2.
BaldassarL (2016) De-demonizing distance in mobile family lives: co-presence, care circulation and polymedia as vibrant matter. Global Networks16(2): 145–163.
3.
BaldassarLBaldockCWildingR (2007) Families Caring Across Borders: Transnational Migration, Ageing and Long Distance Care. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
BaldassarLNedelcuMMerlaLet al. (2016) ICT-based co-presence in transnational families and communities: challenging the premise of face-to-face proximity in sustaining relationships. Global Networks16(2): 133–144.
5.
BelskyJRovineM (1990) Patterns of marital change across the transition to parenthood: pregnancy to three years postpartum. Journal of Marriage and Family52: 5–19.
6.
BlackshawT (2009) Fathers and childbirth. In: SquireC (ed.) The Social Context of Birth. Abingdon: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd, pp. 215–235.
7.
Bondas-SalonenT (1998) How women experience the presence of their partners at the births of their babies. Qualitative Health Research8(6): 784–800.
ChenC (2007) From little worries to big anxieties: the medicalization of prenatal examination and women’s changing experience of pregnancy in Taiwan, 1945–2006. Thesis, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan (in Chinese).
10.
ClimoJ (1992) Distant Parents. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Hondagneu-SoteloPAvilaE (1997) I’m here, but I’m there: the meanings of Latina transnational motherhood’. Gender & Society11(5): 548–571.
17.
HsiehS (1996) Factors of cesarean section’. Taiwan Panorama21(8): 44–51 (in Chinese).
18.
HsuF (2015) Doing family in a transnational context: the gender politics of communication technologies. Master’s Thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei (in Chinese).
19.
HuangSYeohBSA (2005) transnational families and their children’s education: China’s ‘Study Mothers’ in Singapore’. Global Networks5(4): 379–400.
20.
IpWY (2000) Chinese husbands’ presence during labour: a preliminary study in Hong Kong. International Journal of Nursing Practice6: 89–96.
KainzGEliassonMYon PostI (2010) The child’s father, an important person for the mother’s wellbeing during the childbirth: a hermeneutic study. Health Care for Women International31: 621–635.
23.
KangT (2012) Gendered media, changing intimacy: Internet-mediated transnational communication in the family sphere. Media, Culture & Society34(2): 146–161.
LanY (2000) The lived experience of accompanying husbands in labor. Thesis, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan (in Chinese).
26.
LeavittJ (2003) What do men have to do with it? Fathers and mid-twentieth century childbirth. Bulletin of the History of Medicine77(2): 235–262.
27.
LeeW (2009) Taiwanese husbands involved in the prenatal and childbirth and the change in gender politics 1970–2008. Thesis, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan (in Chinese).
28.
MaC (2002) Bodily autonomy and decision making in cesarean section. PhD Thesis, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan (in Chinese).
29.
MadianouM (2012) Migration and the accentuated ambivalence of motherhood: the role of ICTs in Filipino transnational families. Global Networks12(3): 277–295.
30.
MadianouM (2016) Ambient co-presence: transnational family practices in polymedia environments. Global Networks16: 183–201.
31.
MadianouMMillerD (2013) Polymedia: towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies16(2): 169–187.
32.
ManningFA (1989) Reflections on future directions of perinatal medicine. Seminars in Perinatology13: 342–351.
33.
MattinglySS (1992) The maternal-fetal dyad: exploring the two-patient obstetric model. Hastings Center Report22: 13–18.
34.
NedelcuMWyssM (2016)‘Doing family’ through ICT-mediated ordinary co-presence: transnational communication practices of Romanian migrants in Switzerland. Global Networks16(2): 202–218.
35.
ParreñasR (2005) Long distance intimacy: class, gender and intergenerational relations between mothers and children in Filipino transnational families. Global Networks5(4): 317–336.
36.
RobertsonZWildingRGiffordS (2016) Mediating the family imagery: young people negotiating absence in transnational refugees families. Global Networks16(2): 219–236.
37.
RoyRNSchummWRBrittSL (2014) Transition to Parenthood. New York: Springer.
38.
SandelowskiM (1994) Separate, but less unequal: fetal ultrasound and the transformation of expectant mother/fatherhood. Gender and Society8(2): 230–245.
39.
SapkotaSKobayashiTTakasevM (2011) Women’s experience of giving birth with their husband’s support in Nepal. British Journal of Midwifery19(7): 426–432.
40.
SayadA (1999) La Double Absence: Des Illusions De L’émigré Aux Souffrances De L’immigré. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Somers-SmithMJ (1999) A place for the partner? Expectations and experiences of support during childbirth. Midwifery15: 101–108.
43.
Uy-TiocoC (2007) Overseas Filipino workers and text messaging: reinventing transnational mothering. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies21(2): 253–265.
