Drawing from observations in China and from world history, this is a reflection on boyd and Crawford’s provocation on social problems related to Big Data, especially ‘Just because it is accessible does not make it ethnical’.
boyddCrawfordK (2012) Critical questions for Big Data: provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society15(5): 662–679.
CleaverH (1998) The Zapatistas and the electronic fabric of struggle. In: HollowayJPelaezE (eds) Zapatista! Reinventing Revolution in Mexico. London: Pluto Press, pp. 81–103.
6.
CouldryNTurowJ (2014) Advertising, Big Data, and the clearance of the public realm. International Journal of Communication8: 1710–1726.
7.
DoronAJeffreyR (2013) The Great Indian Phone Book. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
EvansP (2005) The new commons vs. the second enclosure movement. Studies in Comparative International Development40(2): 85–94.
9.
FuchsC (2010) Class, knowledge and new media. Media, Culture & Society32(1): 141–150.
10.
FuchsC (2012) The political economy of privacy on Facebook. Television & New Media13(2): 139–159.
11.
GandyO (1993) The Panoptic Sort: A Political Economy of Personal Information. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
12.
HarveyD (2004) The ‘new’ imperialism: accumulation by dispossession. Socialist Register40: 63–87.
QiuJL (2009) Working-Class Network Society: Communication Technology and The Information Have-Less in Urban China. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
Van DijkJ (2013) The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
WallersteinI (1991) Geopolitics and Geoculture: Essays on the Changing World-System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
YuJ (2009) Major types and basic characteristics of mass incidents in China today. Journal of China University of Political Science and Law14(6): 114–120 (in Chinese).
