Without suggesting a break from ongoing research into historical examples of corporate and industrial media, this article points towards additional and complementary avenues of research. It considers the role of (what we might call) the audience across contemporary and historical media workplace media practices by offering a framework for thinking through the cultural meanings embedded within labor-related media by users. Rather than focusing audience research through the lens of ‘industrial’ or (more recently) ‘corporate’ – categories that are both broad (‘industrial’ includes a wide range of internal and external communication and education purposes) and exclusive (neither allows for the inclusion of all media produced and consulted in the course of business, e.g. an office worker watching YouTube on the job) – I suggest using ‘work/place’ to understand media use and practice within structures of labor and location. Placing audience studies literature alongside discussions of labor and place, I sketch a preliminary outline for understanding these practices while pursuing questions related to the definition of audiences, the specificities of non-entertainment media, and mediated place and labor. My conclusion points to the methodological challenges and special considerations tied to this ‘work/place’ lens and the possibilities of undertaking live subject audience research.
AndrejevicM (2008) Watching television without pity: the productivity of online fans. Television & New Media9(1): 24–46.
2.
AndrejevicM (2013) Estranged free labor. In: ScholtzT (ed.) Digital Labour: The Internet as Playground and Factory. New York: Routledge, pp. 149–164.
3.
AngI (1990) Culture and communication: toward an ethnographic critique of media consumption in the transnational media system. European Journal of Communications5: 239–260.
4.
ArendtH (1998) The Human Condition, 2nd edn.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BakerS (2011) How do you best engage employees about corporate/internal CSR Efforts?PRWeekSeptember: 51–52.
6.
BanksJHumphreysS (2008) The labour of user co-creators: emergent social network markets?Convergence14(4): 401–418.
7.
BenklerY (2006) The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8.
BjörkinM (2009) Technologies of organizational learning: uses of industrial films in Sweden during the 1950s. In: HeidigerVVonderauP (eds) Films that Work: Industrial Film and the Productivity of Media. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 303–314.
9.
BourdonJMéadelC (2011) Inside television audience measurement: deconstructing the ratings machine. Media, Culture & Society35(5): 791–800.
10.
BowerRT (1985) The Changing Television Audience in America. New York: Columbia University Press.
11.
BryceJW (1987) Family time and television use. In: LindlofTR (ed.) Natural Audiences: Qualitative Research of Media Uses and Effects. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Co.
12.
BrunsA (2008) Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.
13.
CameronAFWebsterJ (2005) Unintended consequences of emerging communication technologies: instant messaging in the workplace. Computers in Human Behavior21(1): 85–103.
14.
CarawayB (2011) Audience labor in the new media environment: a Marxian revisiting of the audience commodity. Media, Culture & Society33(5): 693–708.
15.
ColemanSDyer-WithefordN (2007) Playing on the digital commons: collectivities, capital and contestation in videogame culture. Media, Culture & Society29(6): 934–953.
16.
de CerteauM (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life. Trans. RendallS. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
du GayP (1995) Consumption and Identity at Work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
ElsaesserT (2009) Archives and archeologies: the place of non-fiction film in contemporary media. In: HeidigerVVonderauP (eds) Films that Work: Industrial Film and the Productivity of Media. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 19–34.
19.
EnstadN (1999) Ladies of Labor, Girls of Adventure. New York: Columbia University Press.
20.
ERC (2012) ERC 2012 Social Media in the Workplace Study. Mayfield, OH: ERC.
21.
FuchsC (2014) Digital Labour and Karl Marx. New York: Routledge.
22.
GiddensA (1993) Space and time. In: CassellP (ed.) The Giddens Reader. Stonford, CA: Stanford University Press.
23.
GrayA (1992) Video Playtime: The Gendering of a Leisure Technology. London: Routledge.
24.
GreggM (2011) Work’s Intimacy. Cambridge: Polity.
25.
GrintK (2005) The Sociology of Work. Cambridge: Polity Press.
26.
GrintKWoolgarS (1997) The Machine at Work: Technology, Work, and Organization. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
27.
HallS (1981 [1973]) Encoding/decoding in television discourse. In: HallS. (ed.) Culture, Media, Language. London: Hutchinson.
28.
HardtMNegriA (2005) Multitude. London: Penguin.
29.
HarveyD (1990) The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
30.
HearnA (2010) Structuring feeling: Web 2.0, online ranking and rating, and the digital ‘reputation’ economy. Ephemera10(3/4): 421–438.
31.
HeidigerVVonderauP (eds) (2009) Films that Work: Industrial Film and the Productivity of Media. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
32.
HobanCF (1953) Determinants of audience reaction to a training film. Audio Visual Communication Review1(1): 30–37.
33.
HorneJ (2011) A history long overdue: the public library and motion pictures. In: AclandCRWassonH (eds) Useful Cinema. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp.149–177.
34.
JhallySLivantB (2006) Watching as working: the valorization of audience consciousness. In JhallyS (ed.) The Spectacle of Accumulation: Essays in Culture, Media, and Politics. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 25–44.
35.
JohnsonD (2007) Inviting audiences in: the spatial reorganization of production and consumption in ‘TVIII’. New Review of Film and Television Studies5(1): 61–80.
LefebvreH (1991) The Production of Space. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
39.
LindlofTR (1987) Ideology and pragmatics of media access in prison. In: LindlofTR (ed.) Natural Audiences: Qualitative Research of Media Uses and Effects. New Jersey: Ablex PublishingCo., pp. 175–197.
40.
LuffPHindmarshJHeathC (eds) (2000) Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
MasseyD (1994) Space, Place, and Gender. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
42.
MasseyD (2005) For Space. London: Sage.
43.
ManzerolleV (2010) Mobilizing the audience commodity: digital labour in a wireless world. Ephemera10(3/4): 455–469.
44.
McCarthyA (2001) Ambient Television: Visual Culture and Public Space. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
45.
MoitraS (2009) Reality is there but it’s manipulated: West German trade unions and film after 1945. In: HeidigerVVonderauP (eds) Films that Work: Industrial Film and the Productivity of Media. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 329–348.
46.
MooresS (1993) Interpreting Audiences: The Ethnography of Media Consumption. London: Sage.
47.
MoriniCFumagalliA (2010) Life put to work: toward a life theory of value. Ephemera10(3/4): 234–252.
48.
MorleyD (1992) Television Audiences and Cultural Studies. London: Routledge.
49.
MorleyD (1994) Between the public and the private: the domestic uses of information and communication technologies. In: CruzJLewisJ (eds) Viewing, Reading, Listening: Audiences and Cultural Reception. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 101–124.
50.
MorleyDSilverstoneR (1992) Domestic communication: technologies and meanings. In: MorleyDavid, Television Audiences and Cultural Studies.London: Routledge, pp. 201–212.
51.
NapoliPM (2011) Revisiting ‘mass communication’ and the ‘work’ of the audience in the new media environment. Media, Culture & Society32(3): 505–516.
52.
NeffGFiore-SilfvastBDossickCS (2010) A case study of the failure of digital media to cross knowledge boundaries in virtual construction in information. Communication & Society13: 556–573.
53.
OstherrK (2011) Medical education through film: animating anatomy at the American College of Surgeons and Eastman Kodak. In: OrgeronDOrgeronMStreibleD (eds) Learning with the Lights Off: Educational Film in the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 168–192.
54.
ScannellP (1988) Radio times: the temporal arrangements of broadcasting in the modern world. In: DrummondPPattersonR (eds) Television and its Audience: International Perspectives. London: BFI, pp. 15–31.
55.
ScottCRTimmermanCE (2005) Relating computer, communication, and computer-mediated communication apprehensions to new communication technology use in the workplace. Communication Research32: 683–725.
56.
ScottDT (2011) Intimacy threats and intersubjective users: telephone training films, 1927–1962. American Quarterly63(3): 487–507.
57.
ScottJC (1985) Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
58.
SeiterE (1999) Television and New Media Audiences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
59.
SilverstoneR (1994) Television and Everyday Life. New York: Routledge.
60.
SmytheDW (2006 [2001]) On the audience commodity and its work. In: DurhamMGKellnerDM (eds) Media and Cultural Studies: KeyWorks. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 230–256.
61.
SolbrigH (2009) The personnel is political: voice and citizenship in affirmative-action videos in the Bell system, 1970–1984. In: HeidigerVVonderauP (eds) Films that Work: Industrial Film and the Productivity of Media. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 259–282.
62.
SpigelL (1992) Make Room for TV: Television and the Family Ideal in Postwar America (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).
63.
TerranovaT (2000) Free labor: producing culture for the digital economy. Social Text63(18): 33–58.
64.
TrontiM (1962) Arbeiter und Kapital. Frankfurt: Verlag Neue Kritik.
65.
TudorD (2009) Who counts? Who is being counted? How audience measurement embeds neoliberalism into urban space. Media, Culture & Society31(5): 833–840.
66.
WilliamsR (1985) Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society, rev. edn.New York: Oxford University Press.
67.
WinocurR (2005) Radio and everyday life: uses and meanings in the domestic sphere. Television & New Media6(3): 319–332.
68.
ZimmermannY (2009) ‘What Hollywood is to America, the corporate film is to Switzerland’: Remarks on industrial film as utility film. In: HeidigerVVonderauP (eds) Films that Work: Industrial Film and the Productivity of Media. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 101–118.
