The search for a civic commons online: an assessment of existing BBC Online policy

Abstract

Debates surrounding democracy and the internet are of central importance to the future of public service broadcasting. Some of these debates have led a group of scholars to argue for the establishment of a civic commons online, in response to the commercial nature of the internet and its limited support of deliberative democracy. General features of a civic commons online include the formation of a deliberative space free from corporate and state influence, yet that receives some form of public funding. Given their long and relatively successful history, some scholars have argued that existing public service broadcasters might provide the best chance for the establishment of such a commons. This article evaluates existing BBC Online policy in the UK in light of these arguments, and assesses the extent to which existing policy might allow space for the establishment of such a civic commons. The article concludes by arguing that while existing BBC Online policy would allow the basic grounds for the establishment of a civic commons online, there are significant obstacles to its full realization.

Keywords

BBC Online BBC Trust civic commons digital democracy internet media policy public service broadcasting

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barnett

(2011) BBC ‘won’t pursue iPad TV licence cheats’. Daily Telegraph. Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/8313770/BBC-wont-pursue-iPad-TV-licence-cheats.html (accessed July 2012).

Barnett

(2006) Can the BBC invigorate our political culture? In: Lloyd

Seaton

(eds) What Can Be Done? Making the Media and Politics Better. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 58–69.

Bau

(2009) Realising online democracy: a critical appraisal of ‘online civic commons’. Compass Thinkpieces. Available at: http://clients.squareeye.com/uploads/compass/documents/CTP51BauDemocracy.pdf (accessed December 2010).

BBC (2006) Royal Charter. London: BBC.

BBC (2010a) TV Licence Fee: briefing. BBC. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/keyfacts/stories/licencefee2.shtml (accessed July 2012).

BBC (2010b) Have Your Say. BBC. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/have_your_say/ (accessed December 2010).

BBC (2012c) Full Financial Statements, 2011/12. London: BBC.

BBC (2012a) Do I need a TV licence to watch programmes on BBC iPlayer? BBC. Available at: http://iplayerhelp.external.bbc.co.uk/help/playing_tv_progs/tvlicence/ (accessed July 2012).

BBC (2012b) Where to get BBC iPlayer. BBC. Available at: http://iplayerhelp.external.bbc.co.uk/help/where_to_get_iplayer/television/ (accessed August 2012).

10.

BBC (2013) House rules. BBC. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/moderation.shtml#house (accessed January 2013).

11.

BBC Trust (2007) BBC Public Purpose Remit: Sustaining Citizenship and Civil Society. London: BBC Trust.

12.

BBC Trust (2009) Review of Fair Trading Policies. London: BBC Trust.

13.

BBC Trust (2012a) BBC Online Service Licence. Issued May 2012. London: BBC Trust.

14.

BBC Trust (2012b) The BBC’s year, 2011–2012. London: BBC Trust.

15.

Blumler

Coleman

(2001) Realising Democracy Online: A Civic Commons in Cyberspace. IPPR/Citizens Online Research Publication, No. 2. London: IPPR.

16.

Blumler

Gurevitch

(2001) The new media and our political communication discontents: democratizing cyberspace. Information, Communication & Society 4(1): 1–13.

17.

Born

(2006) Digitising democracy. In: Lloyd

Seaton

(eds) What Can Be Done? Making the Media and Politics Better. Oxford: Blackwell, pp.102–123.

18.

Brookes

(2004) Watching Alone: Social Capital and Public Service Broadcasting. London: The Work Foundation/BBC.

19.

Coleman

(2002) From service to commons: re-inventing a space for public communication. In: Tambini

Cowling

(eds) From Public Service Broadcasting to Public Service Communications. London: IPPR, pp. 88–98.

20.

Coleman

Blumler

(2009) The Internet and Democratic Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

21.

Coleman

Gøtze

(2001) Bowling Together: Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation. London: Hansard Society.

22.

Cowling

Tambini

(2002) Conclusions and recommendations. In: Tambini

Cowling

(eds) From Public Service Broadcasting to Public Service Communications. London: IPPR, pp. 171–181.

23.

Coyle

(2012) Public Value in Practice: Restoring the Ethos of Public Service. London: BBC Trust.

24.

Curran

(1991) Rethinking the media as a public sphere. In: Dahlgren

Sparks

(eds) Communication and Citizenship: Journalism and the Public Sphere in the New Media Age. London: Routledge, pp. 27–57.

25.

Curran

Fenton

Freedman

(2012) Misunderstanding the Internet. Abingdon: Routledge.

26.

Dahlberg

(1998) Cyberspace and the public sphere: exploring the democratic potential of the net. Convergence 4(1): 71–84.

27.

Dahlberg

(2001a) The internet and democratic discourse: exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Communication & Society 4(4): 615–633.

28.

Dahlberg

(2001b) Computer-mediated communication and the public sphere: a critical analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 7(1): 1–22.

29.

Dahlberg

(2011) Re-constructing digital democracy: an outline of four ‘positions’. New Media & Society 13(6): 855–872.

30.

Dahlgren

(2001) The public sphere and the net: structure, space and communication. In: Lance Bennett

Entman

(eds) Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33–55.

31.

Dahlgren

(2005) The internet, public spheres, and political communication: dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication 22(2): 147–162.

32.

Dahlgren

(2009) Media and Political Engagement: Citizens, Communication and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

33.

DCMS (2006) Broadcasting: An Agreement Between Her Majesty’s Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport and the British Broadcasting Corporation. London: HMSO.

34.

Downey

Fenton

(2003) New media, counter publicity and the public sphere. New Media & Society 5(2): 185–202.

35.

Garnham

(1986) Media and the public sphere. In: Golding

Murdock

Schlesinger

(eds) Communicating Politics. Leicester: Leicester University Press, pp. 37–53.

36.

Greenslade

(2012) Mail Online goes top of the world. Daily Mail. Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2012/jan/25/dailymail-internet (accessed January 2013).

37.

Guardian (2009) Community standards and participation guidelines. Guardian. Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/community-standards (accessed January 2013).

38.

Haas

(1999) What’s ‘public’ about public journalism? Public journalism and the lack of a coherent public philosophy. Communication Theory 9(3): 346–364.

39.

Habermas

(1989) Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Polity.

40.

Habermas

(1997) The public sphere. In: Goodin

Pettit

(eds) Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 105–108.

41.

Habermas

(2009) Europe: The Faltering Project. Cambridge: Polity.

42.

Hindman

(2009) The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

43.

Horrocks

(2008) The value of citizen journalism. BBC. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2008/01/value_of_citizen_journalism.html (accessed September 2009).

44.

Iosifidis

(2011) The public sphere, social networks and public service media. Information, Communication & Society 14(5): 619–637.

45.

Karppinen

Moe

Svensson

(2008) Habermas, Mouffe and political communication. Javnost/The Public 15(3): 5–22.

46.

Keane

(1995) Structural transformations of the public sphere. Communication Review 1: 1–22.

47.

Michalis

(2012) Balancing public and private interests in online media: the case of BBC Digital Curriculum. Media, Culture & Society 34(8): 944–960.

48.

Moe

(2008) Dissemination and dialogue in the public sphere: a case for public service media online. Media, Culture & Society 30(3): 319–336.

49.

Murdock

(2004) Building the digital commons: public broadcasting in the age of the internet. University of Montreal, The 2004 Spry Memorial Lecture, Vancouver, 18 November/Montreal, 22 November.

50.

Murdock

(2012) A tale of two charters: the BBC and the commons. OpenDemocracy. Available at: http://www.opendemocracy.net/ourbeeb/graham-murdock/tale-of-two-charters-bbc-and-commons (accessed November 2012).

51.

ONS (2012) Internet Access – Households and Individuals, 2012. Available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_275775.pdf (accessed January 2013).

52.

Ramsey

(2010a) Public service broadcasting and the public sphere: normative arguments from Habermasian theory. Networking Knowledge: Journal of the MeCCSA Postgraduate Network 3(2): 1–14.

53.

Ramsey

(2010b) Response to BBC Strategy Review 2010. Centre for Media Research, Media Policy Briefing Paper No. 6. Coleraine: University of Ulster.

54.

Roberts

(2009) Beyond the “networked public sphere”: politics, participation and technics in Web 2.0. Fibreculture 14.

55.

Scannell

(1989) Public service broadcasting and modern public life. Media, Culture & Society 11: 135–166.

56.

Wahl-Jorgensen

Williams

Wardle

(2010) Audience views on user-generated content: exploring the value of news from the bottom up. Northern Lights 8: 177–194.