This article posits that a spatial discourse can be discerned in broadcasting and media policies in India that has framed nationalism, globalization, sovereignty, and citizenship. Through a range of spatial practices, India’s nation-state has historically elaborated two overlapping modalities of power: national sovereignty from 1947 to 1990, and governmentality since 1991. To understand the spatial discourses and the modalities of power we need to move beyond methodological nationalism: that is, explanations that treat state as a container and a fixed entity, where social relations are organized within territorially bounded national spaces. The article demonstrates that the spatial discourse of the state can be grasped through a transnational framework that considers national and international as part of the wider global field of relations.
BarrettC (2004) Neither poison nor cure: space, scale and public life in media today. In:CouldryNMcCarthyA (eds) MediaSpace: Place, Scale, and Culture in a Media Age. London: Routledge, pp. 58–74.
2.
BennettT (1992) Putting policy into cultural studies. In:GrossbergLNelsonCTreichlerP (eds) Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge, pp. 23–37.
3.
BramanS (1995) Horizons of the state: information policy and power. Journal of Communication45(4): 4–23.
4.
ButcherM (2003) Transnational Television, Cultural Identity and Change: When STAR Came to India. London: Sage.
5.
ChakravarttyP (2004) Telecom, national development and the Indian state: a postcolonial critique. Media, Culture & Society26(2): 227–249.
6.
ChakravarttyPSarikakisK (2006) Media Policy and Globalization. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
7.
ChanderRKarnikK (1976) Planning for Satellite Broadcasting: The Indian Instructional Television Experiment. Paris: UNESCO.
8.
ChatterjeeP (1993) The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
CouldryNMcCarthyA (eds) MediaSpace: Place, Scale, and Culture in a Media Age. London: Routledge.
10.
CunninghamSMillerT (1994) Contemporary Australian Television. Kensington: New South Wales University Press.
11.
DasB (2006) Mediating modernity: colonial discourse and radio broadcasting, c.1924–1947. In: BelB. (eds) Media and Mediation. New Delhi: Sage, pp. 229–254.
12.
DeshpandeS (2000) Hegemonic spatial strategies: the nation-space and Hindu communalism in twentieth-century India. In:ChatterjeePJeganathanP (eds) Subaltern Studies XII: Community, Gender, and Violence. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 167–211.
13.
FergusonJGuptaA (2002) Spatializing states: toward an ethnography of neo-liberal governmentality. American Ethnologist29(4): 981–1002.
14.
FlewT (1997) Citizenship, participation and media policy formation. Communication and Social Policy4(4): 87–102.
15.
GoswamiM (2004) Producing India: From Colonial Economy to National Space. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
GuptaPS (1988) Radio and the Raj, 1921–47. Centre for the Study of Social Sciences, Calcutta. Sakharam Ganesh Deuskar Lectures on Indian History and Culture. Calcutta: K.P Bagchi.
17.
HansenTB (2008) Sovereigns beyond the state: on legality and authority in urban India. In:HansenTBStepputatF (eds) Sovereign Bodies: Citizens, Migrants, and States in the Postcolonial World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 169–191.
18.
HardingeHR (1934) Broadcasting for rural India. Asiatic Review30(104): 619–623.
19.
HayJ (2001) Locating the televisual. Television & New Media2(3): 205–234.
20.
HeldD (1995) Democracy and the Global Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
21.
HughesS (2002) The ‘music boom’ in Tamil South India: gramophone, radio and the making of mass culture. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television22(4): 446–469.
22.
JeffreyR (2006) The Mahatma didn’t like the movies and why it matters: Indian broadcasting policy, 1920s–1990s. Global Media and Communication2(2): 204–224.
23.
JohnsonVE (2008) Heartland TV: Prime Time Television and the Struggle for U.S. Identity. New York: New York University Press.
24.
JoshiPC (1984) An Indian Personality for Television: Report of the Working Group on Software for Doordarshan. Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. New Delhi: Government of India Publications Division.
25.
KavirajS (1998) The culture of representative democracy. In:ChatterjeeP (ed.) Wages of Freedom: Fifty Years of the Indian Nation-state. Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 121–138.
26.
KumarS (2006) From Doordarshan to Prasar Bharati: the search for autonomy in Indian television. In: Gandhi Meets Primetime: Globalization and Nationalism in Indian Television. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
27.
LefebvreH (1974) The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
28.
LelyveldD (1990) Transmitters and culture: the colonial roots of Indian broadcasting. South Asia Research10(1): 41–52.
29.
McDowellSD (1997) Globalization and policy choice: television and audiovisual services policies in India. Media, Culture & Society19(2): 151–172.
30.
Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (1990) Prasar Bharati Act (Broadcasting Corporation of India). New Delhi: Government of India.
31.
ModyB (1979) Programming for SITE. Journal of Communication29: 90–97.
32.
MorrisNWaisbordS (eds) (2001) Media and Globalization: Why the State Matters. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
33.
NordenstrengKSchillerH (eds) (1979) National Sovereignty and International Communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
34.
NordenstrengKSchillerH (eds) (1993) Beyond National Sovereignty: International Communication in the 1990s. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
35.
OngA (2006) Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers32(10): 3–8.
36.
PapaMJPapaWSinghalA (2006) Organizing for Social Change: A Dialectical Journey of Theory and Praxis. London: Sage.
37.
PaswanRS (1996) National Media Policy: A Working Paper. New Delhi: Government of India.
38.
PendakurM (1991) A political economy of television: state, class and corporate confluence in India. In:SussmanGLentJA (eds) Transnational Communications: Wiring the Third World. London: Sage.
39.
PinkertonA (2008) Radio and the Raj: broadcasting in British India (1920–1940). Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society18: 1–30.
40.
Plymouth Report (1937) Interim Report of a Committee on Broadcasting Services in the Colonies. Colonial No. 139. Committee on Broadcasting in the Colonies, Ivor Miles Windsor-Clive Earl of Plymouth.H.M Stationary Office: Great Britain.
41.
PoduvalS (1999) The possible histories of Indian television. Journal of Arts and Ideas32–33: 108–118.
42.
PrakashG (2000) Another Reason: Science and Imagination of Modern India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
43.
PrasadM (1998) The state in/of cinema. In:ChatterjeeP (ed.) Wages of Freedom: Fifty Years of the Indian Nation-state. Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 123–146.
44.
PriceME (2002) Media and Sovereignty: The Global Information Revolution and Its Challenge to State Power. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
RajadhyakshaA (1990) Beaming messages to the nation. Journal of Arts and Ideas19: 132–150.
46.
RajadhyakshaA (1999) The judgement: re-forming the ‘public’. Journal of Arts and Ideas32–33: 34–52.
47.
Report on the Progress of Broadcasting in India (1940) Delhi: Manager of Publications.
48.
RoyA (2008) Bringing up TV: popular culture and development in modern India. South Asian Popular Culture6(1): 29–43.
49.
RuggieJG (1993) Territoriality and beyond: problematizing modernity in international relations. International Organization47(1): 139–174.
50.
SenguptaN (1996) Report on the High Powered Committee on Prasar Bharati. Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. New Delhi: Government of India.
51.
ShomeR (2003) Space matters: the power and practice of space. Communication Theory13(1): 39–56.
52.
SinhaS (2008) Lineages of the developmentalist state: transnationality and village India, 1900–1965. Comparative Studies in Society and History50(1): 57–90.
53.
StricklandCF (1934) Broadcasting in the Indian village: address to the East India Association. Asiatic Review30(101): 1–26.
54.
VergheseBG (1978) Akash Bharati: National Broadcast Trust, Report of the Working Group on Autonomy for Akashvani and Doordarshan. Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. New Delhi: Government of India.
55.
ZivinJ (1998) The imagined reign of the iron lecturer: village broadcasting in colonial India. Modern Asian Studies32(3): 717–738.
