The commercial success of open source software, along with a broader socio-cultural shift towards participation in media and cultural production, have inspired attempts to extend and expand open source practices. These include expansions from software into general culture through ‘Free Culture’ movements and, more recently, expansions from software into hardware and design. This article provides a critical perspective on the democratic potential of these broader ‘open’ contribution structures by examining how open source contributions to both software and hardware increase the opportunities for democratic participation in production, governance and knowledge exchange. By analysing attempts to ‘open source’ the sharing of hardware designs, it also notes the limitations of this democratization. The insights developed in the article nuance the relationship between open source cultures and commercial and market structures, identifying how the generative opportunities created by certain aspects of open source contribution structures increase the potential for democratizing production of communication tools, but also how incongruities across different open-source cultures and communities of practice limit the democratic potential of these processes.
BauwensM (2009) Class and capital in peer production. In: MoorePKaratzogianniA (eds) Parallel Visions of P2P production: Governance,Organization and the New Economies, Special issue, Capital and ClassJanuary.
2.
BazzichelliT (2008) Networking: The Net as Artwork. Aarhus: Digital Aesthetics Research Centre, Aarhus University
3.
BenklerY (2006) The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
4.
BowkerGStarSL (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
BuechleyLHillBM (2009) Lilypad in the wild: how hardware’s long tail is supporting new engineering and design communities. Presented at DIS 2010, 16–20 August, Aarhus Denmark.
6.
CallonM (1981) Pour une sociologie des controverses technologiques. Fundamenta Scientiae2(3): 381–399.
7.
CammaertsB (2011) Disruptive sharing in a digital age: rejecting neoliberalism?Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies25(1): 47–62.
8.
ColemanGGolubA (2008) Hacker practice: moral genres and the cultural articulation of liberalism. Anthropological Theory8(3): 255–277.
9.
DeleuzeGGuattariF (1987) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
10.
DouglasS (1987) Inventing American Broadcasting, 1899–1922. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11.
DowningJ (2003) The independent media center movement and the anarchist social tradition. In: CouldryNCurranJ (eds) Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World. Toronto: Rowman and Littlefield.
12.
Dunbar-HesterC (2008) Propagating technology, propagating community? Low-power radio activism and technological negotiation in the U.S., 1996–2006. PhD Thesis, Cornell University, USA.
13.
Dyer-WithefordN (1999) Cyber-Marx: Cycles and Circuits of Struggle in High-technology Capitalism. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
FuchsC (2003) Structuration theory and self-organization. Systemic Practice and Action Research16(2): 133–167.
16.
GallowayARThackerE (2007) The Exploit: A Theory of Networks. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
17.
GauntlettD (2010) Making is Connecting: The Social Meaning of Creativity, from DIY and Knitting to YouTube and Web 2.0. London: Polity Press.
18.
GiddensA (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Bristol: Polity Press.
19.
GristockJ (2008) A typology of user-led innovation. Working Paper, University of Sussex, Department of Biology and Environmental Sciences, January.
20.
HaringK (2006) Ham Radio’s Technical Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
HertzG (2011) Arduino microcontrollers and the Queen’s Hamlet: utilitarian and hedonized DIY practices in contemporary digital culture. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ARCADIA). Stoughton, WI: Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture, pp. 44–47.
22.
HimanenP (2001) The Hacker Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Random House.
InnisH (1951) The Bias of Communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
25.
JasanoffS (2004) Ordering knowledge, ordering society. In: JasanoffS (ed.) States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. New York: Routledge, pp. 13–45.
26.
KaratzogianniAMichaelidesG (2009) Cyberconflict at the edge of chaos: cryptohierarchies and self-organization in the open source. In: MoorePKaratzogianniA (eds) Parallel Visions of P2P Production: Governance, Organization and the New Economies, special issue, Capital and ClassJanuary.
LessigL (2004) Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. New York: Penguin Books.
30.
LevyS (1984) Hackers. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
31.
LinY (2004) Hacking practices and software development: a social worlds analysis of ict innovation and the role of free/libre open source software. PhD Thesis, University of York, UK.
MansellRBerdouE (2008) Political economy, the internet and free/open source software development. In: HunsingerJAllenMKlastrupL (eds) International Handbook of Internet Research. Amsterdam: Springer.
34.
NeumannJ (2009) Personal Interview on OHANDA process, Berlin, Germany.
35.
NissenbaumH (2004) Hackers and the contested ontology of cyberspace. New Media & Society6(2): 195–217.
36.
OnionR (2008) Reclaiming the machine: an introductory look at steampunk in everyday practice. Neo-Victorian Studies1(1): 138–163.
37.
OpenCores (2011) Main page. Available at: http://opencores.org. Accessed March 2011.
38.
OHANDA (Open Hardware and Design Alliance) (2009) Main page. Available at: http://www.ohanda.org. Accessed 5 January 2010 (page subsequently changed; original page available at the internet archive).
39.
Open Hardware Roadmap (2011) Main page. Available at: http://ohroadmap.org. Accessed 15 November 2011.
TerranovaT (2000) Free labor: producing culture for the digital economy. Social Text18(2): 33–58.
42.
SöderbergJ (2008) Hacking Capitalism: The Free and Open Source Software Movement. London: Routledge.
43.
StarSL (2002) Infrastructure and ethnographic practice: working on the fringes. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems14(2): 107–122.
44.
StarSLGriesemerJR (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’, and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology 1907–1939. Social Studies of Science19: 387–420.
45.
StarkD (2001) Ambiguous assets for uncertain environments: heterarchy in postsocialist firms. In: DiMaggioP (ed.) The Twenty-first-century Firm. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 69–104.
46.
StallmanR (1999) The GNU operating system and the open source revolution. In: DiBonaCOckmanSStoneM (eds) Open Sources – Voices from the Open Source Revolution. London: O’Reilly and Associates, pp. 53–70.
47.
RattoM (2011) Critical making: conceptual and material studies in technology and social life. The Information Society27(4): 252–260.
48.
TurnerF (2005) Where the counterculture met the new economy: the WELL and the origins of virtual community. Technology and Culture46(3): 485–512.
49.
Van AbelBEversLKlassenRTroxlerP (eds) (2011) Open Design Now: How Design Can No Longer Be Exclusive. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
50.
WallisCQiuJLLingR (2009) Alternative mobile handsets and grassroots innovation in the global south: a critical examination. Paper presented at the Association for Internet Researchers Conference, 8–11 October, Milwaukee, WI.
51.
WeberS (2004) The Success of Open Source. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
ZittrainJ (2008) The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
53.
ŽižekS (2008) In Defense of Lost Causes. London: Verso.
