The collaborative paradigm: towards an invitational and participatory concept of online communication

Abbott A (2001) Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Baron NS (1998) Letters by phone or speech by other means: the linguistics of e-mail. Language and Communication 18: 133–170.

Baym N Zhang YB Lin M (2004) Social interactions across media: interpersonal communication on the internet, telephone and face-to-face. New Media & Society 6(3): 299–318.

Baym N (2009) Interpersonal life online. In Lievrouw LA Livingstone S (eds) Handbook of New Media. London: Sage, 35–54.

Biesecker-Mast GJ (1996) How to read social movement rhetorics as discursive events. Iowa Journal of Communication 28(2): 74–101.

Black E (1970) The second persona. Quarterly Journal of Speech 56(2): 109–119.

Boggs C (2000) The End of Politics: Corporate Power and the Decline of the Public Sphere. New York: Guilford Press.

Bogost I (2007) Persuasive Games: The Expressive Power of Videogames. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Brummett B (1999) Some implications of ‘process’ or ‘intersubjectivity’: postmodern rhetoric. In Lucaites JL Condit CM Caudill S (eds) Contemporary Rhetorical Theory. New York: Guilford Press, 153–175.

Bruns A (2008) Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.

Butler J (1997) Excitable Speech. New York: Routledge.

Campbell KK (2005) Agency: promiscuous and protean. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 2(1): 1–19.

Carnevale P Probst TM (1997) Conflict on the internet. In: Kiesler S (ed.) Culture of the Internet. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 233–254.

Carey JW (1989) Communication as Culture. New York: Routledge.

Cassirer E (1953) Substance and Function, trans. Swabey WC Swabay MC . New York: Dover.

Castells M (2000) Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. British Journal of Sociology 51(1): 5–24.

Cherny L (1999) Conversations and Community: Chat in a Virtual World. Stanford, CA: CSLI.

Dawson P (2003) Reshaping Change: A Processual Perspective. London: Routledge.

Dean J (2003) Why the net is not a public sphere. Constellations 10(1): 95–112.

Deleuze G Guattari F (2004) Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Continuum.

Derrida J (2001) Writing and Difference. London: Routledge.

Deuze M (2006) Participation, remediation, bricolage: considering principal components of a digital culture. The Information Society 22: 63–75.

Dewey J Bentley AF (1949) Knowing and the Known. Boston, MA: Beacon Press

Elwood WN (1995) Public relations in a rhetorical experience: the integral principle in case study analysis. In: Elwood WN (ed.) Public Relations Inquiry as Rhetorical Criticism: Case Studies of Corporate Discourse and Social Influence. Westport, CT: Praeger, 3–34.

Engeli M (2000) Digital Stories: The Poetics of Communication. Basel: Birkhäuser.

Emirbayer M (1997) Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology 103(2): 281–317.

Gaggi S (1997) From Text to Hypertext: Decentering the Subject in Fiction, Film, the Visual Arts, and Electronic Media. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Galegher J Sproull L Kiesler S (1998) Legitimacy, authority and community in electronic support groups. Written Communication 15(4): 493–530.

Ganesh S Stohl C (2010) Qualifying engagement: a study of information and communication technology and the global social justice movement in Aotearoa New Zealand. Communication Monographs 77(1): 51–74.

Gerhards J Schäfer MS (2010) Is the internet a better public sphere? Comparing old and new media in the USA and Germany. New Media & Society 12(1): 143–160.

Giglio M (2011) Middle East uprising: Facebook’s secret role in Egypt. Available at: http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-02-24/middle-east-uprising-facebooks-back-channel-diplomacy/#

Gimmler A (2001) Deliberative democracy, the public sphere and the internet. Philosophy and Social Criticism 27(4): 21–39.

Gurak L (1997) Persuasion and Privacy in Cyberspace: The Online Protests over Lotus MarketPlace and the Clipper. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Hall S (2001) Encoding/decoding. In: Harrington CL Bielby DD (eds) Popular Culture: Production and Consumption. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 123–132.

Hausman A (2000) A multi-method investigation of consumer motivations in impulsive buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing 17(5): 403–419.

Haraway D (1995) Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.

Harrison TM Barthel B (2009) Wielding new media in Web 2.0: exploring the history of engagement with the collaborative construction of media products. New Media & Society 11(1–2): 155–178.

Hermes J (2006) Citizenship in the age of the internet. European Journal of Communication 21(3): 295–309.

Herring S (2004) Online communication: through the lens of discourse. Internet Research Annual 1: 65–76.

Hoffman DL Novak TP (1996) Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing 60(3): 50–68.

Jensen KB (2010) Media Convergence: The Three Degrees of Network, Mass and Interpersonal Communication. Abingdon: Routledge.

Just SN (2008) European public debate – offered identities and performed agencies. In: Dam L Holmgreen L-L Strunck J (eds) Rhetorical Aspects of Discourse in Present-day Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press, 70–101.

Katz E Lazarsfeld P (1955) Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

Carlson N (2011) Facebook has more than 600 million users, Goldman tells clients. Available at: http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-has-more-than-600-million-users-goldman-tells-clients-2011-1

Keller J (2010) Evaluating Iran’s Twitter revolution. Available at: http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2010/06/evaluating-irans-twitter-revolution/58337/

Lasswell HD (1948) The structure and function of communication in society. In: Bryson L (ed.) The Communication of Ideas. New York: Harper & Brothers, 37–51.

Lea M (1991) Rationalist assumptions on cross-media comparison of computer-mediated communication. Behaviour and Information Technology 10(2): 153–172.

Lévi-Strauss C (1962) La Pensée sauvage. France: Presses Pocket.

Li C Bernoff J (2008) Groundswell: Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.

Marshall J (2004) Governance, structure and existence: authenticity, rhetoric, race and gender on an internet mailing list. In: Proceedings of the Australian Electronic Governance Conference, Available at: http://www.public-policy.unimelb.edu.au/egovernance/papers/21_Marshall.pdf

McKenna KYA Bragh JA (2000) Plan 9 from cyberspace: the implications of the internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review 4(1): 57–75.

McQuail D (2010) McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory, 6th edn. London: Sage.

Murray J (1997) Hamlet on the Holodeck. New York: The Free Press.

Napoli PM (2010) Revisiting ‘mass communication’ and the ‘work’ of the audience in the new media environment. Media, Culture & Society 32(3): 505–516.

Office of National Statistics (2008) Statistical bulletin: e-commerce and ICT activity. Available at: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/pdfdir/ecom1109.pdf

Parr B (2011) LinkedIn surpasses 100 million users. Available at: http://mashable.com/2011/03/22/linkedin-surpasses-100-million-users-infographic

Poster M (2001) Cyberdemocracy: the internet and the public sphere. In: Trend D (ed.) Reading Digital Culture. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 259–271.

Qualman E (2009) Socialnomics: How Social Media Transforms the Way We Live and Do Business. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Rogers EM Kincaid DL (1981) Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research. New York: The Free Press.

Rosenberg S (2009) Say Everything: How Blogging Began, What It’s Becoming, and Why It Matters. New York: Random House.

Scammell M (2000) The internet and civic engagement: the age of the citizen-consumer. Political Communication 17(3): 351–355.

Scolari CA (2009) Mapping conversations about new media: the theoretical field of digital communication. New Media & Society 11(6): 943–964.

Shannon C Weaver W (1949) The Mathematical Model of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

Smith A (2009) The internet’s role in campaign 2008. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Available at: http://skin.ris.org/uploadi/editor/1243958591The_Internets_Role_in_Campaign_2008.pdf

Smith DH (1972) Communication research and the idea of process. Speech Monographs 39(3): 174–182.

Smith JH Just SN (2009) Playful persuasion: the rhetorical potential of advergames. Nordicom Review 30(2): 53–68.

Stromer-Galley J Martey RM (2009) Visual spaces, norm governed places: the influence of spatial context online. New Media & Society 11(6): 1041–1060.

Tapscott D Williams AD (2006) Wikinomics. New York: Portfolio.

Trogemann G Pelt M (2006) Citizen media – technological and social challenges of user driven media. Paper presented at BBEurope 2006 conference, Geneva, Switzerland, 11–14 December.

Turkle S (1996) Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Vatz RE (1999) The myth of the rhetorical situation. In: Lucaites JL Condit CM Caudill S (eds) Contemporary Rhetorical Theory. New York: Guilford Press, 226–231.

Walther JB (1996) Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal and hyper-personal interaction. Communication Research 23(1): 3–43.

Warnick B (2007) Rhetoric Online: Persuasion and Politics on the World Wide Web. New York: Peter Lang.

Whitehead A (1929) Process and Reality. New York: Macmillan.

Westley BH MacLean MS (1957) A conceptual model for communications research. Journalism Quarterly 34(1): 31–38.

Zappen JP (2005) Digital rhetoric: toward and integrated theory. Technical Communication Quarterly 14(3): 319–325.