Bondebjerg, I. (1996) `Public Discourse/Private Fascination: Hybridisation in True-life-story Genres', Media, Culture & Society18(1): 27-45.
2.
Carroll, N. (1996) Theorizing the Moving Image. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
CIM-Audimetrie (2004) Audience Ratings North, URL (retrieved March 2004): www.gfkaudimetrie.be
4.
CIM-Audimetrie (2007) Audience Ratings North, URL (retrieved January 2008): www.gfkaudimetrie.be
5.
Corner, J. (1996) The Art of Record. Manchester : Manchester University Press.
6.
Corner, J. (2002) `Performing the Real: Documentary Diversions', Television and New Media3(3): 255-69.
7.
Corner, J. (2003) `Documentary Realism', pp. 126-9 in G. Creeber (ed.) The Television Genre Book. London: BFI Publishing.
8.
Dhoest, A. (2004) `The Pfaffs Are Not Like the Osbournes: National Inflections of the Celebrity Docusoap', Television and New Media6(2): 224-45.
9.
Dovey, J. (2000) Freak Show: First-person Media and Factual Television . London: Pluto Press.
10.
Feuer, J. (1992) `Genre Study and Television', pp. 138-61 in R.C. Allen (ed.) Channels of Discourse, Reassembled. London: Routledge.
11.
Fiske, J. (1987) Television Culture. London: Methuen.
12.
Fiske, J. and J. Hartley (1978) Reading Television. London: Methuen.
13.
Gitlin, T. (2000) Inside Prime Time. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
14.
Glynn, K. (2000) Tabloid Culture: Trash Taste, Popular Power and the Transformation of American Television. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
15.
Goffman, E. (1969) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Pelican Books.
16.
Grierson, J. (1933) `The Documentary Producer', Cinema Quarterly2(1): 7-9.
17.
Gross, L., J. Katz and J. Ruby (eds) ( 1988) Image Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Hartley, J. (2003) `Situation Comedy, Part 1', pp. 65-7 in G. Creeber (ed.) The Television Genre Book. London: BFI Publishing.
19.
Hill, A. (2002) `Big Brother. The Real Life Audience', Television and New Media3(3): 323-40.
20.
Jensen, J. (1992) `Fandom as Pathology: The Consequences of Characterization' , pp. 9-29 in L.A. Lewis (ed.) The Adoring Audience: Fan Culture and Popular Media. London: Routledge.
21.
Juhasz, A. and J. Lerner (eds) (2006) F is for Phony: Fake Documentary and Truth's Undoing. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
22.
Kilborn, R. (1994) `How Real Can You Get? Recent Developments in "Reality" Television', European Journal of Communication9(4): 421-39.
23.
Kilborn, R. (2000) `The Docu-soap: A Critical Assessment', pp. 111-21 in J. Izod and R. Kilborn (eds) From Grierson to the Docu-soap. Luton: LutonUniversity Press .
24.
Kilborn, R. (2003) Staging the Real: Factual TV Programming in the Age of Big Brother. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
25.
Nichols, B. (1991) Representing Reality. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
26.
Nichols, B. (1994) Blurred Boundaries. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
27.
Nichols, B. (2001) An Introduction to Documentary. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
28.
Paget, D. (2004) `Codes and Conventions of Dramadoc and Docudrama' , pp. 196-208 in R.C. Allen and A. Hill (eds) The Television Studies Reader. London: Routledge.
29.
Plantinga, C. (1997) Rhetoric and Representation in Nonfiction Film . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Rhodes, G.D. and J.P. Springer (eds) (2006) Docufictions: Essays on the Intersection of Documentary and Fictional Filmmaking. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
31.
Roscoe, J. and C. Hight (2001) Faking It: Mock-documentary and the Subversion of Factuality. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
32.
Rosenthal, A. and J. Corner (eds) (2005) New Challenges for Documentary . Manchester: Manchester University Press.
33.
VRT (2005) Één Information Brochure. Internal and External Communication VRT-TV. Brussels: VRT.
34.
VRT (2008) Audience Ratings Kaat & Co. VRT Research Department Report. Brussels : VRT.
35.
Wittgenstein, L. (1958) Philosophical Investigations. New York: Macmillan.
36.
Woestijnvis (n.d.) `Home Page', URL (retrieved January 2008): www.woestijnvis.be